These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37213180)

  • 1. It is not what you say but how you say it: Evidence from Russian shows robust effects of the structural prior on noisy channel inferences.
    Poliak M; Ryskin R; Braginsky M; Gibson E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Apr; 50(4):637-649. PubMed ID: 37213180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rational Sentence Interpretation in Mandarin Chinese.
    Zhan M; Chen S; Levy R; Lu J; Gibson E
    Cogn Sci; 2023 Dec; 47(12):e13383. PubMed ID: 38073607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How do people interpret implausible sentences?
    Cai ZG; Zhao N; Pickering MJ
    Cognition; 2022 Aug; 225():105101. PubMed ID: 35339795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rational integration of noisy evidence and prior semantic expectations in sentence interpretation.
    Gibson E; Bergen L; Piantadosi ST
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 May; 110(20):8051-6. PubMed ID: 23637344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A noisy-channel approach to depth-charge illusions.
    Zhang Y; Ryskin R; Gibson E
    Cognition; 2023 Mar; 232():105346. PubMed ID: 36512866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of context on noisy-channel sentence comprehension.
    Chen S; Nathaniel S; Ryskin R; Gibson E
    Cognition; 2023 Sep; 238():105503. PubMed ID: 37302257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A rational inference approach to group and individual-level sentence comprehension performance in aphasia.
    Warren T; Dickey MW; Liburd TL
    Cortex; 2017 Jul; 92():19-31. PubMed ID: 28391038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Semantic integration processes at different levels of syntactic hierarchy during sentence comprehension: an ERP study.
    Zhou X; Jiang X; Ye Z; Zhang Y; Lou K; Zhan W
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 May; 48(6):1551-62. PubMed ID: 20138898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speaker-specific processing of anomalous utterances.
    Brehm L; Jackson CN; Miller KL
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Apr; 72(4):764-778. PubMed ID: 29504462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preschoolers Flexibly Adapt to Linguistic Input in a Noisy Channel.
    Yurovsky D; Case S; Frank MC
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Jan; 28(1):132-140. PubMed ID: 28078978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Agrammatic comprehension of simple active sentences with moved constituents: Hebrew OSV and OVS structures.
    Friedmann N; Shapiro LP
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2003 Apr; 46(2):288-97. PubMed ID: 14700372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do we rely on good-enough processing in reading under auditory and visual noise?
    Zdorova N; Malyutina S; Laurinavichyute A; Kaprielova A; Ziubanova A; Lopukhina A
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0277429. PubMed ID: 36693033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Noisy is better than rare: Comprehenders compromise subject-verb agreement to form more probable linguistic structures.
    Keshev M; Meltzer-Asscher A
    Cogn Psychol; 2021 Feb; 124():101359. PubMed ID: 33254044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sentence comprehension in Slovak-speaking patients with Alzheimer's disease.
    Marková J; Horváthová Ľ; Králová M; Cséfalvay Z
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2017 Jul; 52(4):456-468. PubMed ID: 28000389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integration of input and expectations influences syntactic parses, not just sentence interpretation.
    Buxó-Lugo A; Slevc LR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Mar; 50(3):500-508. PubMed ID: 37439729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. I see what you meant to say: Anticipating speech errors during online sentence processing.
    Lowder MW; Ferreira F
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Oct; 148(10):1849-1858. PubMed ID: 30556724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of syntactic priming in sentence comprehension.
    Tooley KM; Traxler MJ; Swaab TY
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):19-45. PubMed ID: 19210079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The time course of verb processing in Dutch sentences.
    de Goede D; Shapiro LP; Wester F; Swinney DA; Bastiaanse R
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2009 Jun; 38(3):181-99. PubMed ID: 19452278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Number Dissimilarity Effects in Object-Initial Sentence Comprehension by German-Speaking Children With Specific Language Impairment.
    Stegenwallner-Schütz M; Adani F
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Mar; 64(3):870-888. PubMed ID: 33630663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Plausibility and structural reanalysis in L1 and L2 sentence comprehension.
    Lee J; Witzel J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Feb; 76(2):319-337. PubMed ID: 35319306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.