BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37214836)

  • 1.
    Alexandari AM; Horton CA; Shrikumar A; Shah N; Li E; Weilert M; Pufall MA; Zeitlinger J; Fordyce PM; Kundaje A
    bioRxiv; 2023 May; ():. PubMed ID: 37214836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High resolution models of transcription factor-DNA affinities improve in vitro and in vivo binding predictions.
    Agius P; Arvey A; Chang W; Noble WS; Leslie C
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2010 Sep; 6(9):. PubMed ID: 20838582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Competition for DNA binding between paralogous transcription factors determines their genomic occupancy and regulatory functions.
    Zhang Y; Ho TD; Buchler NE; Gordân R
    Genome Res; 2021 Jul; 31(7):1216-1229. PubMed ID: 33975875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contribution of Sequence Motif, Chromatin State, and DNA Structure Features to Predictive Models of Transcription Factor Binding in Yeast.
    Tsai ZT; Shiu SH; Tsai HK
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Aug; 11(8):e1004418. PubMed ID: 26291518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A biophysical model for analysis of transcription factor interaction and binding site arrangement from genome-wide binding data.
    He X; Chen CC; Hong F; Fang F; Sinha S; Ng HH; Zhong S
    PLoS One; 2009 Dec; 4(12):e8155. PubMed ID: 19956545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comprehensive, high-resolution binding energy landscapes reveal context dependencies of transcription factor binding.
    Le DD; Shimko TC; Aditham AK; Keys AM; Longwell SA; Orenstein Y; Fordyce PM
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Apr; 115(16):E3702-E3711. PubMed ID: 29588420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting transcription factor site occupancy using DNA sequence intrinsic and cell-type specific chromatin features.
    Kumar S; Bucher P
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Jan; 17 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):4. PubMed ID: 26818008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Benchmarking DNA binding affinity models using allele-specific transcription factor binding data.
    Li X; Melo LAN; Bussemaker HJ
    bioRxiv; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38168434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Role of Genome Accessibility in Transcription Factor Binding in Bacteria.
    Gomes AL; Wang HH
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2016 Apr; 12(4):e1004891. PubMed ID: 27104615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative analysis of models in predicting the effects of SNPs on TF-DNA binding using large-scale in vitro and in vivo data.
    Han D; Li Y; Wang L; Liang X; Miao Y; Li W; Wang S; Wang Z
    Brief Bioinform; 2024 Jan; 25(2):. PubMed ID: 38517697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transfer learning reveals sequence determinants of the quantitative response to transcription factor dosage.
    Naqvi S; Kim S; Tabatabaee S; Pampari A; Kundaje A; Pritchard JK; Wysocka J
    bioRxiv; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38853998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sequence and chromatin determinants of cell-type-specific transcription factor binding.
    Arvey A; Agius P; Noble WS; Leslie C
    Genome Res; 2012 Sep; 22(9):1723-34. PubMed ID: 22955984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Discovering epistatic feature interactions from neural network models of regulatory DNA sequences.
    Greenside P; Shimko T; Fordyce P; Kundaje A
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Sep; 34(17):i629-i637. PubMed ID: 30423062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nonconsensus Protein Binding to Repetitive DNA Sequence Elements Significantly Affects Eukaryotic Genomes.
    Afek A; Cohen H; Barber-Zucker S; Gordân R; Lukatsky DB
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Aug; 11(8):e1004429. PubMed ID: 26285121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Overlapping binding sites underlie TF genomic occupancy.
    Khetan S; Bulyk ML
    bioRxiv; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38496549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative modeling of transcription factor binding specificities using DNA shape.
    Zhou T; Shen N; Yang L; Abe N; Horton J; Mann RS; Bussemaker HJ; Gordân R; Rohs R
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Apr; 112(15):4654-9. PubMed ID: 25775564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computational identification of diverse mechanisms underlying transcription factor-DNA occupancy.
    Cheng Q; Kazemian M; Pham H; Blatti C; Celniker SE; Wolfe SA; Brodsky MH; Sinha S
    PLoS Genet; 2013; 9(8):e1003571. PubMed ID: 23935523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identification of context-specific gene regulatory networks with GEMULA--gene expression modeling using LAsso.
    Geeven G; van Kesteren RE; Smit AB; de Gunst MC
    Bioinformatics; 2012 Jan; 28(2):214-21. PubMed ID: 22106333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of deep learning approaches for modeling transcription factor sequence specificity.
    Zhang Y; Mo Q; Xue L; Luo J
    Genomics; 2021 Nov; 113(6):3774-3781. PubMed ID: 34534646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanistic interpretation of non-coding variants for discovering transcriptional regulators of drug response.
    Xie X; Hanson C; Sinha S
    BMC Biol; 2019 Jul; 17(1):62. PubMed ID: 31362726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.