216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37215333)
1. Lexical Frequency and Sentence Context Influence the Brain's Response to Single Words.
Huizeling E; Arana S; Hagoort P; Schoffelen JM
Neurobiol Lang (Camb); 2022; 3(1):149-179. PubMed ID: 37215333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Delta-Band Neural Responses to Individual Words Are Modulated by Sentence Processing.
Slaats S; Weissbart H; Schoffelen JM; Meyer AS; Martin AE
J Neurosci; 2023 Jun; 43(26):4867-4883. PubMed ID: 37221093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Deep Artificial Neural Networks Reveal a Distributed Cortical Network Encoding Propositional Sentence-Level Meaning.
Anderson AJ; Kiela D; Binder JR; Fernandino L; Humphries CJ; Conant LL; Raizada RDS; Grimm S; Lalor EC
J Neurosci; 2021 May; 41(18):4100-4119. PubMed ID: 33753548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading.
Hoeks JC; Stowe LA; Doedens G
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Mar; 19(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 14972359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. N400-like magnetoencephalography responses modulated by semantic context, word frequency, and lexical class in sentences.
Halgren E; Dhond RP; Christensen N; Van Petten C; Marinkovic K; Lewine JD; Dale AM
Neuroimage; 2002 Nov; 17(3):1101-16. PubMed ID: 12414253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Neural activity during sentence processing as reflected in theta, alpha, beta, and gamma oscillations.
Lam NHL; Schoffelen JM; Uddén J; Hultén A; Hagoort P
Neuroimage; 2016 Nov; 142():43-54. PubMed ID: 26970187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Word's Predictability Can Modulate Semantic Preview Effect in High-Constraint Sentences.
Xu L; Liu S; Wang S; Sun D; Li N
Front Psychol; 2022; 13():849351. PubMed ID: 35401306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lexical Predictability During Natural Reading: Effects of Surprisal and Entropy Reduction.
Lowder MW; Choi W; Ferreira F; Henderson JM
Cogn Sci; 2018 Jun; 42 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):1166-1183. PubMed ID: 29442360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The time course of contextual effects on visual word recognition.
Lee CY; Liu YN; Tsai JL
Front Psychol; 2012; 3():285. PubMed ID: 22934087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Frequency and predictability effects on event-related potentials during reading.
Dambacher M; Kliegl R; Hofmann M; Jacobs AM
Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 1084(1):89-103. PubMed ID: 16545344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lexical effects on spoken-word recognition in children with normal hearing.
Krull V; Choi S; Kirk KI; Prusick L; French B
Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):102-14. PubMed ID: 19701087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Information entropy facilitates (not impedes) lexical processing during language comprehension.
Karimi H; Weber P; Zinn J
Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38361106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Oscillatory brain responses in spoken word production reflect lexical frequency and sentential constraint.
Piai V; Roelofs A; Maris E
Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jan; 53():146-56. PubMed ID: 24291513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Flexible parafoveal encoding of character order supports word predictability effects in Chinese reading: Evidence from eye movements.
Chang M; Hao L; Zhao S; Li L; Paterson KB; Wang J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Aug; 82(6):2793-2801. PubMed ID: 32406003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction at the intersection of sentence context and word form: Evidence from eye-movements and self-paced reading.
Amenta S; Hasenäcker J; Crepaldi D; Marelli M
Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Jun; 30(3):1081-1092. PubMed ID: 36510092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Language Models Explain Word Reading Times Better Than Empirical Predictability.
Hofmann MJ; Remus S; Biemann C; Radach R; Kuchinke L
Front Artif Intell; 2021; 4():730570. PubMed ID: 35187472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of lexical and conceptual constraints on reading mixed-language sentences: evidence from eye fixations and naming times.
Altarriba J; Kroll JF; Sholl A; Rayner K
Mem Cognit; 1996 Jul; 24(4):477-92. PubMed ID: 8757496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Word-Initial Letters Influence Fixation Durations during Fluent Reading.
Hand CJ; O'Donnell PJ; Sereno SC
Front Psychol; 2012; 3():85. PubMed ID: 22485100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Words in Context: The Effects of Length, Frequency, and Predictability on Brain Responses During Natural Reading.
Schuster S; Hawelka S; Hutzler F; Kronbichler M; Richlan F
Cereb Cortex; 2016 Oct; 26(10):3889-3904. PubMed ID: 27365297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A further look at ageing and word predictability effects in Chinese reading: Evidence from one-character words.
Zhao S; Li L; Chang M; Wang J; Paterson KB
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Jan; 74(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 32749198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
