BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37215333)

  • 21. Correction to "Emotional context and predictability in naturalistic reading aloud" by Alexander and Buzzell (2023).
    Emotion; 2024 Apr; 24(3):647. PubMed ID: 38602794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Word predictability effects are linear, not logarithmic: Implications for probabilistic models of sentence comprehension.
    Brothers T; Kuperberg GR
    J Mem Lang; 2021 Feb; 116():. PubMed ID: 33100508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Lexical processing and text integration of function and content words: evidence from priming and eye fixations.
    Schmauder AR; Morris RK; Poynor DV
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Oct; 28(7):1098-108. PubMed ID: 11126934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Early Brain Sensitivity to Word Frequency and Lexicality During Reading Aloud and Implicit Reading.
    Faísca L; Reis A; Araújo S
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():830. PubMed ID: 31031684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Language Prediction Is Reflected by Coupling between Frontal Gamma and Posterior Alpha Oscillations.
    Wang L; Hagoort P; Jensen O
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Mar; 30(3):432-447. PubMed ID: 28949823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Beta oscillations reflect memory and motor aspects of spoken word production.
    Piai V; Roelofs A; Rommers J; Maris E
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2015 Jul; 36(7):2767-80. PubMed ID: 25872756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of decay and lexical uncertainty on processing long-distance dependencies in reading.
    Stone K; von der Malsburg T; Vasishth S
    PeerJ; 2020; 8():e10438. PubMed ID: 33362963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Revisiting the incremental effects of context on word processing: Evidence from single-word event-related brain potentials.
    Payne BR; Lee CL; Federmeier KD
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Nov; 52(11):1456-69. PubMed ID: 26311477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Predicting language: MEG evidence for lexical preactivation.
    Dikker S; Pylkkänen L
    Brain Lang; 2013 Oct; 127(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 23040469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Semantic cortical activation in dyslexic readers.
    Helenius P; Salmelin R; Service E; Connolly JF
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1999 Sep; 11(5):535-50. PubMed ID: 10511642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Neural Evidence for the Prediction of Animacy Features during Language Comprehension: Evidence from MEG and EEG Representational Similarity Analysis.
    Wang L; Wlotko E; Alexander E; Schoot L; Kim M; Warnke L; Kuperberg GR
    J Neurosci; 2020 Apr; 40(16):3278-3291. PubMed ID: 32161141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Emotional context and predictability in naturalistic reading aloud.
    Alexander JM; Buzzell GA
    Emotion; 2024 Apr; 24(3):617-627. PubMed ID: 37707485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bilingual word recognition in a sentence context.
    Assche EV; Duyck W; Hartsuiker RJ
    Front Psychol; 2012; 3():174. PubMed ID: 22675314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. How the brain makes sense beyond the processing of single words - An MEG study.
    Hultén A; Schoffelen JM; Uddén J; Lam NHL; Hagoort P
    Neuroimage; 2019 Feb; 186():586-594. PubMed ID: 30481591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Predictive pre-activation of orthographic and lexical-semantic representations facilitates visual word recognition.
    Eisenhauer S; Gagl B; Fiebach CJ
    Psychophysiology; 2022 Mar; 59(3):e13970. PubMed ID: 34813664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of contextual plausibility on word skipping during reading.
    Veldre A; Reichle ED; Wong R; Andrews S
    Cognition; 2020 Apr; 197():104184. PubMed ID: 31954289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Eye movements and processing stages in reading: relative contribution of visual, lexical, and contextual factors.
    Calvo MG; Meseguer E
    Span J Psychol; 2002 May; 5(1):66-77. PubMed ID: 12025367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Combined eye tracking and fMRI reveals neural basis of linguistic predictions during sentence comprehension.
    Bonhage CE; Mueller JL; Friederici AD; Fiebach CJ
    Cortex; 2015 Jul; 68():33-47. PubMed ID: 26003489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Ageing and the misperception of words: Evidence from eye movements during reading.
    Warrington KL; White SJ; Paterson KB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016 Nov; ():1-10. PubMed ID: 27784194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Neural correlates of processing sentences and compound words in Chinese.
    Bulut T; Hung YH; Tzeng O; Wu DH
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0188526. PubMed ID: 29194453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.