These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

395 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37217249)

  • 1. Anticipating artificial intelligence in mammography screening: views of Swedish breast radiologists.
    Högberg C; Larsson S; Lång K
    BMJ Health Care Inform; 2023 May; 30(1):. PubMed ID: 37217249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 'Humans think outside the pixels' - Radiologists' perceptions of using artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection in mammography screening in a clinical setting.
    Johansson JV; Engström E
    Health Informatics J; 2024; 30(3):14604582241275020. PubMed ID: 39155239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of Combined Artificial Intelligence and Radiologist Assessment to Interpret Screening Mammograms.
    Schaffter T; Buist DSM; Lee CI; Nikulin Y; Ribli D; Guan Y; Lotter W; Jie Z; Du H; Wang S; Feng J; Feng M; Kim HE; Albiol F; Albiol A; Morrell S; Wojna Z; Ahsen ME; Asif U; Jimeno Yepes A; Yohanandan S; Rabinovici-Cohen S; Yi D; Hoff B; Yu T; Chaibub Neto E; Rubin DL; Lindholm P; Margolies LR; McBride RB; Rothstein JH; Sieh W; Ben-Ari R; Harrer S; Trister A; Friend S; Norman T; Sahiner B; Strand F; Guinney J; Stolovitzky G; ; Mackey L; Cahoon J; Shen L; Sohn JH; Trivedi H; Shen Y; Buturovic L; Pereira JC; Cardoso JS; Castro E; Kalleberg KT; Pelka O; Nedjar I; Geras KJ; Nensa F; Goan E; Koitka S; Caballero L; Cox DD; Krishnaswamy P; Pandey G; Friedrich CM; Perrin D; Fookes C; Shi B; Cardoso Negrie G; Kawczynski M; Cho K; Khoo CS; Lo JY; Sorensen AG; Jung H
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Mar; 3(3):e200265. PubMed ID: 32119094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection in screening mammography in Sweden: a prospective, population-based, paired-reader, non-inferiority study.
    Dembrower K; Crippa A; Colón E; Eklund M; Strand F;
    Lancet Digit Health; 2023 Oct; 5(10):e703-e711. PubMed ID: 37690911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Women's perceptions and attitudes towards the use of AI in mammography in Sweden: a qualitative interview study.
    Viberg Johansson J; Dembrower K; Strand F; Grauman Å
    BMJ Open; 2024 Feb; 14(2):e084014. PubMed ID: 38355190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. External Evaluation of 3 Commercial Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Independent Assessment of Screening Mammograms.
    Salim M; Wåhlin E; Dembrower K; Azavedo E; Foukakis T; Liu Y; Smith K; Eklund M; Strand F
    JAMA Oncol; 2020 Oct; 6(10):1581-1588. PubMed ID: 32852536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Women's attitudes and perspectives on the use of artificial intelligence in the assessment of screening mammograms.
    Holen ÅS; Martiniussen MA; Bergan MB; Moshina N; Hovda T; Hofvind S
    Eur J Radiol; 2024 Jun; 175():111431. PubMed ID: 38520804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiologist Preferences for Artificial Intelligence-Based Decision Support During Screening Mammography Interpretation.
    Hendrix N; Lowry KP; Elmore JG; Lotter W; Sorensen G; Hsu W; Liao GJ; Parsian S; Kolb S; Naeim A; Lee CI
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2022 Oct; 19(10):1098-1110. PubMed ID: 35970474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can we reduce the workload of mammographic screening by automatic identification of normal exams with artificial intelligence? A feasibility study.
    Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Lång K; Gubern-Merida A; Teuwen J; Broeders M; Gennaro G; Clauser P; Helbich TH; Chevalier M; Mertelmeier T; Wallis MG; Andersson I; Zackrisson S; Sechopoulos I; Mann RM
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep; 29(9):4825-4832. PubMed ID: 30993432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Artificial intelligence (AI) for breast cancer screening: BreastScreen population-based cohort study of cancer detection.
    Marinovich ML; Wylie E; Lotter W; Lund H; Waddell A; Madeley C; Pereira G; Houssami N
    EBioMedicine; 2023 Apr; 90():104498. PubMed ID: 36863255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiologists' perceptions on AI integration: An in-depth survey study.
    Cè M; Ibba S; Cellina M; Tancredi C; Fantesini A; Fazzini D; Fortunati A; Perazzo C; Presta R; Montanari R; Forzenigo L; Carrafiello G; Papa S; Alì M
    Eur J Radiol; 2024 Aug; 177():111590. PubMed ID: 38959557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reader bias in breast cancer screening related to cancer prevalence and artificial intelligence decision support-a reader study.
    Al-Bazzaz H; Janicijevic M; Strand F
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Aug; 34(8):5415-5424. PubMed ID: 38165430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of Breast Cancer with Mammography: Effect of an Artificial Intelligence Support System.
    Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Krupinski E; Mordang JJ; Schilling K; Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Sechopoulos I; Mann RM
    Radiology; 2019 Feb; 290(2):305-314. PubMed ID: 30457482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of artificial intelligence support on accuracy and reading time in breast tomosynthesis image interpretation: a multi-reader multi-case study.
    van Winkel SL; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Appelman L; Gubern-Mérida A; Karssemeijer N; Teuwen J; Wanders AJT; Sechopoulos I; Mann RM
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Nov; 31(11):8682-8691. PubMed ID: 33948701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Artificial Intelligence in Screening Mammography: A Population Survey of Women's Preferences.
    Ongena YP; Yakar D; Haan M; Kwee TC
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2021 Jan; 18(1 Pt A):79-86. PubMed ID: 33058789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stand-Alone Use of Artificial Intelligence for Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening: A Retrospective Evaluation.
    Romero-Martín S; Elías-Cabot E; Raya-Povedano JL; Gubern-Mérida A; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Álvarez-Benito M
    Radiology; 2022 Mar; 302(3):535-542. PubMed ID: 34904872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Norwegian radiologists' expectations of artificial intelligence in mammographic screening - A cross-sectional survey.
    Martiniussen MA; Larsen M; Larsen ASF; Hovda T; Koch HW; Bjørnerud A; Hofvind S
    Eur J Radiol; 2023 Oct; 167():111061. PubMed ID: 37657381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Familiarity, confidence and preference of artificial intelligence feedback and prompts by Australian breast cancer screening readers.
    Trieu PDY; Barron ML; Jiang Z; Tavakoli Taba S; Gandomkar Z; Lewis SJ
    Aust Health Rev; 2024 Jun; 48(3):299-311. PubMed ID: 38692648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stand-Alone Artificial Intelligence for Breast Cancer Detection in Mammography: Comparison With 101 Radiologists.
    Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Lång K; Gubern-Merida A; Broeders M; Gennaro G; Clauser P; Helbich TH; Chevalier M; Tan T; Mertelmeier T; Wallis MG; Andersson I; Zackrisson S; Mann RM; Sechopoulos I
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2019 Sep; 111(9):916-922. PubMed ID: 30834436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combining the strengths of radiologists and AI for breast cancer screening: a retrospective analysis.
    Leibig C; Brehmer M; Bunk S; Byng D; Pinker K; Umutlu L
    Lancet Digit Health; 2022 Jul; 4(7):e507-e519. PubMed ID: 35750400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.