BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37217340)

  • 1. [Establishment method and significance of birthweight curve and reference in single center].
    Wang Y; Wang Y; Tang HR; Zhang Y; Dai CY; Li J; Dai YM; Zheng MM
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2023 May; 58(5):334-342. PubMed ID: 37217340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. INTERGROWTH-21st vs customized birthweight standards for identification of perinatal mortality and morbidity.
    Anderson NH; Sadler LC; McKinlay CJD; McCowan LME
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):509.e1-509.e7. PubMed ID: 26546850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of customization and use of a fetal growth standard on the association between birthweight percentile and adverse perinatal outcome.
    Sovio U; Smith GCS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S738-S744. PubMed ID: 29199029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Small-for-gestational-age infants classified by customized or population birthweight centiles: impact of gestational age at delivery.
    Groom KM; Poppe KK; North RA; McCowan LM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 197(3):239.e1-5. PubMed ID: 17826403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fetal growth restriction and intra-uterine growth restriction: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.
    Vayssière C; Sentilhes L; Ego A; Bernard C; Cambourieu D; Flamant C; Gascoin G; Gaudineau A; Grangé G; Houfflin-Debarge V; Langer B; Malan V; Marcorelles P; Nizard J; Perrotin F; Salomon L; Senat MV; Serry A; Tessier V; Truffert P; Tsatsaris V; Arnaud C; Carbonne B
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Oct; 193():10-8. PubMed ID: 26207980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing the relation between ultrasound-estimated fetal weight and birthweight in cohort of small-for-gestational-age fetuses.
    Stephens K; Al-Memar M; Beattie-Jones S; Dhanjal M; Mappouridou S; Thorne E; Lees C
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Nov; 98(11):1435-1441. PubMed ID: 31090917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sonographic growth curves versus neonatal birthweight growth curves for the identification of fetal growth restriction.
    Bergman M; Reichman O; Farkash R; Bin-Nun A; Samueloff A; Sapir AZ; Sela HY
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(23):4558-4565. PubMed ID: 33417530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new customized fetal growth standard for African American women: the PRB/NICHD Detroit study.
    Tarca AL; Romero R; Gudicha DW; Erez O; Hernandez-Andrade E; Yeo L; Bhatti G; Pacora P; Maymon E; Hassan SS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S679-S691.e4. PubMed ID: 29422207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of antenatal recognition and follow-up on perinatal outcomes in small-for-gestational age infants delivered after 36 weeks.
    Fratelli N; Valcamonico A; Prefumo F; Pagani G; Guarneri T; Frusca T
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Feb; 92(2):223-9. PubMed ID: 23016597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. INTERGROWTH-21st compared with GROW customized centiles in the detection of adverse perinatal outcomes at term.
    Pritchard N; Lindquist A; Siqueira IDA; Walker SP; Permezel M
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Mar; 33(6):961-966. PubMed ID: 30372647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification of the optimal growth charts for use in a preterm population: An Australian state-wide retrospective cohort study.
    Pritchard NL; Hiscock RJ; Lockie E; Permezel M; McGauren MFG; Kennedy AL; Green B; Walker SP; Lindquist AC
    PLoS Med; 2019 Oct; 16(10):e1002923. PubMed ID: 31584941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Competing-risks model for pre-eclampsia and adverse pregnancy outcomes.
    Syngelaki A; Magee LA; von Dadelszen P; Akolekar R; Wright A; Wright D; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Sep; 60(3):367-372. PubMed ID: 35866878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of customized and population-based birth-weight standards: the influence of gestational age.
    Hemming K; Hutton JL; Bonellie S
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Sep; 146(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 19581044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Definitions matter: detection rates and perinatal outcome for infants classified prenatally as having late fetal growth restriction using SMFM biometric vs ISUOG/Delphi consensus criteria.
    Schreiber V; Hurst C; da Silva Costa F; Stoke R; Turner J; Kumar S
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Mar; 61(3):377-385. PubMed ID: 35866888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Customized vs INTERGROWTH-21
    Francis A; Hugh O; Gardosi J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S692-S699. PubMed ID: 29422208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Customized vs population-based growth charts to identify neonates at risk of adverse outcome: systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis of observational studies.
    Chiossi G; Pedroza C; Costantine MM; Truong VTT; Gargano G; Saade GR
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Aug; 50(2):156-166. PubMed ID: 27935148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new birthweight reference in Guangzhou, southern China, and its comparison with the global reference.
    He JR; Xia HM; Liu Y; Xia XY; Mo WJ; Wang P; Cheng KK; Leung GM; Feng Q; Schooling CM; Qiu X
    Arch Dis Child; 2014 Dec; 99(12):1091-7. PubMed ID: 24962952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Customized birthweight centiles predict SGA pregnancies with perinatal morbidity.
    McCowan LM; Harding JE; Stewart AW
    BJOG; 2005 Aug; 112(8):1026-33. PubMed ID: 16045513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does maternal stature modify the association between infants who are small or large for gestational age and adverse perinatal outcomes? A retrospective cohort study.
    Yearwood L; Bone JN; Wen Q; Muraca GM; Lyons J; Razaz N; Joseph KS; Lisonkova S
    BJOG; 2023 Apr; 130(5):464-475. PubMed ID: 36424901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two-stage approach for prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate and adverse perinatal outcome by routine ultrasound examination at 35-37 weeks' gestation.
    Akolekar R; Panaitescu AM; Ciobanu A; Syngelaki A; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 54(4):484-491. PubMed ID: 31271475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.