BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37217370)

  • 1. Validity of the Institut Mutualiste Montsouris classification system for robotic liver resection.
    Sucandy I; Kang RD; Adorno J; Crespo K; Syblis C; Ross S; Rosemurgy A
    HPB (Oxford); 2023 Sep; 25(9):1022-1029. PubMed ID: 37217370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of Clinical Outcomes After Robotic Hepatectomy Applying the Western-Model Southampton Laparoscopic Difficulty Scoring System. An Experience From a Tertiary US Hepatobiliary Center.
    Sucandy I; Kang RD; Adorno J; Goodwin S; Crespo K; Syblis C; Ross S; Rosemurgy A
    Am Surg; 2023 Sep; 89(9):3788-3793. PubMed ID: 37265440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of IWATE, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, and Southampton Laparoscopic Liver Resection Difficulty Scoring Systems for Predicting Intra and Postoperative Outcomes in Robotic Hepatectomy.
    Sucandy I; Ross SB; Adorno Flores J; Syblis C; Pattilachan TM; Christodoulou M; Rosemurgy A
    Am Surg; 2024 Mar; ():31348241241616. PubMed ID: 38520138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of the IMM classification in laparoscopic repeat liver resections for colorectal liver metastases.
    Hobeika C; Tribillon E; Marchese U; Faermark N; Ghedira A; Bonnet S; Nassar A; Gayet B; Fuks D
    Surgery; 2021 Nov; 170(5):1448-1456. PubMed ID: 34176600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. External validation of the Japanese difficulty score for laparoscopic hepatectomy in patients undergoing robotic-assisted hepatectomy.
    Ricker AB; Davis JM; Motz BM; Watson M; Beckman M; Driedger M; Martinie JB; Vrochides D
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Sep; 37(9):7288-7294. PubMed ID: 37558825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation and comparison of the Iwate, IMM, Southampton and Hasegawa difficulty scoring systems for primary laparoscopic hepatectomies.
    Goh BKP; Prieto M; Syn N; Koh YX; Teo JY; Lee SY; Chung AY; Chan CY
    HPB (Oxford); 2021 May; 23(5):770-776. PubMed ID: 33023824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of index-based IWATE criteria as an improved difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection.
    Tanaka S; Kawaguchi Y; Kubo S; Kanazawa A; Takeda Y; Hirokawa F; Nitta H; Nakajima T; Kaizu T; Kaibori M; Kojima T; Otsuka Y; Fuks D; Hasegawa K; Kokudo N; Kaneko H; Gayet B; Wakabayashi G
    Surgery; 2019 Apr; 165(4):731-740. PubMed ID: 30446171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk Factors and Outcomes of Open Conversion During Minimally Invasive Major Hepatectomies: An International Multicenter Study on 3880 Procedures Comparing the Laparoscopic and Robotic Approaches.
    Montalti R; Giglio MC; Wu AGR; Cipriani F; D'Silva M; Suhool A; Nghia PP; Kato Y; Lim C; Herman P; Coelho FF; Schmelzle M; Pratschke J; Aghayan DL; Liu Q; Marino MV; Belli A; Chiow AKH; Sucandy I; Ivanecz A; Di Benedetto F; Choi SH; Lee JH; Park JO; Prieto M; Guzman Y; Fondevila C; Efanov M; Rotellar F; Choi GH; Robles-Campos R; Wang X; Sutcliffe RP; Tang CN; Chong CC; D'Hondt M; Dalla Valle B; Ruzzenente A; Kingham TP; Scatton O; Liu R; Mejia A; Mishima K; Wakabayashi G; Lopez-Ben S; Pascual F; Cherqui D; Forchino F; Ferrero A; Ettorre GM; Levi Sandri GB; Sugioka A; Edwin B; Cheung TT; Long TCD; Abu Hilal M; Aldrighetti L; Fuks D; Han HS; Troisi RI; Goh BKP;
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Aug; 30(8):4783-4796. PubMed ID: 37202573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of liver cirrhosis on the difficulty of minimally-invasive liver resections: a 1:1 coarsened exact-matched controlled study.
    Goh BKP; Syn N; Lee SY; Koh YX; Teo JY; Kam JH; Cheow PC; Jeyaraj PR; Chow PK; Ooi LL; Chung AY; Chan CY
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Sep; 35(9):5231-5238. PubMed ID: 32974782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation and performance of three-level procedure-based classification for laparoscopic liver resection.
    Kawaguchi Y; Tanaka S; Fuks D; Kanazawa A; Takeda Y; Hirokawa F; Nitta H; Nakajima T; Kaizu T; Kaibori M; Kojima T; Otsuka Y; Kubo S; Hasegawa K; Kokudo N; Kaneko H; Wakabayashi G; Gayet B
    Surg Endosc; 2020 May; 34(5):2056-2066. PubMed ID: 31338665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic review and meta-analysis of difficulty scoring systems for laparoscopic and robotic liver resections.
    Linn YL; Wu AG; Han HS; Liu R; Chen KH; Fuks D; Soubrane O; Cherqui D; Geller D; Cheung TT; Edwin B; Aldrighetti L; Abu Hilal M; Troisi RI; Wakabayashi G; Goh BKP;
    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2023 Jan; 30(1):36-59. PubMed ID: 35780493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Applying IWATE criteria to robotic hepatectomy: is there a "robotic effect"?
    Luberice K; Sucandy I; Modasi A; Castro M; Krill E; Ross S; Rosemurgy A
    HPB (Oxford); 2021 Jun; 23(6):899-906. PubMed ID: 33144052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. IWATE criteria are associated with perioperative outcomes in robotic hepatectomy: a retrospective review of 225 resections.
    Labadie KP; Droullard DJ; Lois AW; Daniel SK; McNevin KE; Gonzalez JV; Seo YD; Sullivan KM; Bilodeau KS; Dickerson LK; Utria AF; Calhoun J; Pillarisetty VG; Sham JG; Yeung RS; Park JO
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Feb; 36(2):889-895. PubMed ID: 33608766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of the robotic platform in hepatectomy after prior liver and non-liver abdominal operations: a comparative study of clinical outcomes.
    Sucandy I; Shapera E; Crespo K; Syblis C; Przetocki V; Ross S; Rosemurgy A
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Oct; 16(5):1067-1072. PubMed ID: 34825309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tampa Difficulty Score: a novel scoring system for difficulty of robotic hepatectomy.
    Sucandy I; Dugan MM; Ross SB; Syblis C; Crespo K; Kenary PY; Rosemurgy A
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2024 May; 28(5):685-693. PubMed ID: 38462424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk factors and outcomes in patients undergoing minimally invasive hepatectomy with unplanned conversion: a contemporary NSQIP analysis.
    Vining CC; Al Abbas AI; Kuchta K; Paterakos P; Choi SH; Talamonti M; Hogg ME
    HPB (Oxford); 2023 May; 25(5):577-588. PubMed ID: 36868951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does Preoperative Thrombocytopenia in Patients Undergoing Robotic Hepatectomy for Liver Tumors Predict Poor Outcomes? A Propensity-Score Match Analysis.
    Crowley M; Rayman S; Ross S; Crespo K; Syblis C; Sucandy I; Rosemurgy A
    Am Surg; 2022 Aug; 88(8):1879-1884. PubMed ID: 35471134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic versus laparoscopic major hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: short-term outcomes from a single institution.
    Liu L; Wang Y; Wu T; Lin J; Deng L; Jiang J; An T
    BMC Surg; 2022 Dec; 22(1):432. PubMed ID: 36528768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Safety and efficacy of synchronous robotic surgery for colorectal cancer with liver metastases.
    Dwyer RH; Scheidt MJ; Marshall JS; Tsoraides SS
    J Robot Surg; 2018 Dec; 12(4):603-606. PubMed ID: 29704203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evolution and trends in the adoption of laparoscopic liver resection in Singapore: Analysis of 300 cases.
    Goh BK; Wang Z; Koh YX; Lim KI
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 2021 Oct; 50(10):742-750. PubMed ID: 34755168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.