240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37217958)
1. Post-neoadjuvant treatment pancreatic cancer resectability and outcome prediction using CT,
Yoo J; Lee JM; Joo I; Lee DH; Yoon JH; Yu MH; Jang JY; Lee SH
Cancer Imaging; 2023 May; 23(1):49. PubMed ID: 37217958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Utility of (18) F-FDG PET/CT and CECT in conjunction with serum CA 19-9 for detecting recurrent pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Rayamajhi S; Balachandran A; Katz M; Reddy A; Rohren E; Bhosale P
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Feb; 43(2):505-513. PubMed ID: 28900703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of response using FDG-PET/CT and diffusion weighted MRI after radiochemotherapy of pancreatic cancer: a non-randomized, monocentric phase II clinical trial-PaCa-DD-041 (Eudra-CT 2009-011968-11).
Zimmermann C; Distler M; Jentsch C; Blum S; Folprecht G; Zöphel K; Polster H; Troost EGC; Abolmaali N; Weitz J; Baumann M; Saeger HD; Grützmann R
Strahlenther Onkol; 2021 Jan; 197(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 32638040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Additional Value of Integrated
Yoo J; Lee JM; Yoon JH; Joo I; Lee DH
Korean J Radiol; 2021 May; 22(5):714-724. PubMed ID: 33660461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preoperative Assessment of Pancreatic Cancer with FDG PET/MR Imaging versus FDG PET/CT Plus Contrast-enhanced Multidetector CT: A Prospective Preliminary Study.
Joo I; Lee JM; Lee DH; Lee ES; Paeng JC; Lee SJ; Jang JY; Kim SW; Ryu JK; Lee KB
Radiology; 2017 Jan; 282(1):149-159. PubMed ID: 27556273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: FDG PET/MRI and CT Tumor Metrics for Assessment of Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy and Prediction of Survival.
Panda A; Garg I; Truty MJ; Kline TL; Johnson MP; Ehman EC; Suman G; Anaam DA; Kemp BJ; Johnson GB; Halfdanarson TR; Venkatesh SK; Fidler JL; Goenka AH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Sep; 217(3):730-740. PubMed ID: 33084382
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. FDG-PET Predicts Neoadjuvant Therapy Response and Survival in Borderline Resectable/Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.
Abdelrahman AM; Goenka AH; Alva-Ruiz R; Yonkus JA; Leiting JL; Graham RP; Merrell KW; Thiels CA; Hallemeier CL; Warner SG; Haddock MG; Grotz TE; Tran NH; Smoot RL; Ma WW; Cleary SP; McWilliams RR; Nagorney DM; Halfdanarson TR; Kendrick ML; Truty MJ
J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2022 Sep; 20(9):1023-1032.e3. PubMed ID: 36075389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8.
García-Talavera P; Alejo E; Arias P; Verdú A; Tamayo P; Gómez-Caminero F
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2021; 40(4):207-213. PubMed ID: 34218882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The prognostic value of FIGO staging defined by combining MRI and [
Raffa S; Lanfranchi F; Satragno C; Giannelli F; Marcenaro M; Coco A; Cena SE; Sofia L; Marini C; Mammoliti S; Levaggi A; Tagliafico AS; Sambuceti G; Barra S; Morbelli S; Belgioia L; Bauckneht M
Curr Probl Cancer; 2023 Dec; 47(6):101007. PubMed ID: 37684197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Computed Tomography (CT) in Suspected Recurrent Breast Cancer: A Prospective Comparative Study of Dual-Time-Point FDG-PET/CT, Contrast-Enhanced CT, and Bone Scintigraphy.
Hildebrandt MG; Gerke O; Baun C; Falch K; Hansen JA; Farahani ZA; Petersen H; Larsen LB; Duvnjak S; Buskevica I; Bektas S; Søe K; Jylling AM; Ewertz M; Alavi A; Høilund-Carlsen PF
J Clin Oncol; 2016 Jun; 34(16):1889-97. PubMed ID: 27001573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT as a post-treatment tool in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: comparison with FDG-PET/non-contrast-enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced CT.
Suenaga Y; Kitajima K; Ishihara T; Sasaki R; Otsuki N; Nibu K; Minamikawa T; Kiyota N; Sugimura K
Eur Radiol; 2016 Apr; 26(4):1018-30. PubMed ID: 26188656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between the diagnostic accuracies of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography and conventional imaging in recurrent urothelial carcinomas: a retrospective, multicenter study.
Zattoni F; Incerti E; Colicchia M; Castellucci P; Panareo S; Picchio M; Fallanca F; Briganti A; Moschini M; Gallina A; Karnes JR; Lowe V; Fanti S; Schiavina R; Rambaldi I; Ficarra V; Evangelista L
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Sep; 43(9):2391-2399. PubMed ID: 29302738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contrast-enhanced 18F-FDG PET/CT: 1-stop-shop imaging for assessing the resectability of pancreatic cancer.
Strobel K; Heinrich S; Bhure U; Soyka J; Veit-Haibach P; Pestalozzi BC; Clavien PA; Hany TF
J Nucl Med; 2008 Sep; 49(9):1408-13. PubMed ID: 18703604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Usefulness of
Yokose T; Kitago M; Matsusaka Y; Masugi Y; Shinoda M; Yagi H; Abe Y; Oshima G; Hori S; Endo Y; Toyama K; Iwabuchi Y; Takemura R; Ishii R; Nakahara T; Okuda S; Jinzaki M; Kitagawa Y
Cancer Med; 2020 Jun; 9(12):4059-4068. PubMed ID: 32281301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography performs better than contrast-enhanced computed tomography for metastasis evaluation in the initial staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Santhosh S; Mittal BR; Bhasin DK; Rana SS; Gupta R; Das A; Nada R
Ann Nucl Med; 2017 Oct; 31(8):575-581. PubMed ID: 28689356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Added value of pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET/CT for staging of advanced gastric cancer: Comparison with contrast-enhanced MDCT.
Kawanaka Y; Kitajima K; Fukushima K; Mouri M; Doi H; Oshima T; Niwa H; Kaibe N; Sasako M; Tomita T; Miwa H; Hirota S
Eur J Radiol; 2016 May; 85(5):989-95. PubMed ID: 27130061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison Between Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography and Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography for Resectability Assessment in Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.
Yoo J; Lee JM; Kang HJ; Bae JS; Jeon SK; Yoon JH
Korean J Radiol; 2023 Oct; 24(10):983-995. PubMed ID: 37793669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Added value of digital FDG-PET/CT in disease staging and restaging in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.
de Jong TL; Koopman D; van der Worp CAJ; Stevens H; Vuijk FA; Vahrmeijer AL; Mieog JSD; de Groot JB; Meijssen MAC; Nieuwenhuijs VB; Lioe-Fee GO; Jager PL; Patijn GA
Surg Oncol; 2023 Apr; 47():101909. PubMed ID: 36739788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The value of (18) F-FDG-PET/CT imaging in oral cavity cancer patients following surgical reconstruction.
Müller J; Hüllner M; Strobel K; Huber GF; Burger IA; Haerle SK
Laryngoscope; 2015 Aug; 125(8):1861-8. PubMed ID: 25892275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative effectiveness of
Vaidyanathan S; Chattopadhyay A; Mackie SL; Scarsbrook AF
Br J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 91(1089):20180247. PubMed ID: 29927635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
