These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 372199)
1. Nuclear volume control by nucleoskeletal DNA, selection for cell volume and cell growth rate, and the solution of the DNA C-value paradox. Cavalier-Smith T J Cell Sci; 1978 Dec; 34():247-78. PubMed ID: 372199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Economy, speed and size matter: evolutionary forces driving nuclear genome miniaturization and expansion. Cavalier-Smith T Ann Bot; 2005 Jan; 95(1):147-75. PubMed ID: 15596464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The skeletal function of non-genic nuclear DNA: new evidence from ancient cell chimaeras. Cavalier-Smith T; Beaton MJ Genetica; 1999; 106(1-2):3-13. PubMed ID: 10710706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Informative predation: Towards a new species concept]. Lherminier P C R Biol; 2018 Apr; 341(4):209-218. PubMed ID: 29606595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Coincidence, coevolution, or causation? DNA content, cell size, and the C-value enigma. Gregory TR Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2001 Feb; 76(1):65-101. PubMed ID: 11325054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The relationship between nuclear DNA content and centromere volume in higher plants. Bennett MD; Smith JB; Ward J; Jenkins G J Cell Sci; 1981 Feb; 47():91-115. PubMed ID: 7263787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Foraminifera as a model of eukaryotic genome dynamism. Timmons C; Le K; Rappaport HB; Sterner EG; Maurer-Alcalá XX; Goldstein ST; Katz LA mBio; 2024 Mar; 15(3):e0337923. PubMed ID: 38329358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. r- and K-tactics in the evolution of protist developmental systems: cell and genome size, phenotype diversifying selection, and cell cycle patterns. Cavalier-Smith T Biosystems; 1980; 12(1-2):43-59. PubMed ID: 6155156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diploidy and the selective advantage for sexual reproduction in unicellular organisms. Kleiman M; Tannenbaum E Theory Biosci; 2009 Nov; 128(4):249-85. PubMed ID: 19902285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Variation across species in the size of the nuclear genome supports the junk-DNA explanation for the C-value paradox. Pagel M; Johnstone RA Proc Biol Sci; 1992 Aug; 249(1325):119-24. PubMed ID: 1360673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Heterochromatin, satellite DNA, and cell function. Structural DNA of eucaryotes may support and protect genes and aid in speciation. Yunis JJ; Yasmineh WG Science; 1971 Dec; 174(4015):1200-9. PubMed ID: 4943851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gene control in eukaryotes and the c-value paradox "excess" DNA as an impediment to transcription of coding sequences. Zuckerkandl E J Mol Evol; 1976 Dec; 9(1):73-104. PubMed ID: 798041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Non-random radial higher-order chromatin arrangements in nuclei of diploid human cells. Cremer M; von Hase J; Volm T; Brero A; Kreth G; Walter J; Fischer C; Solovei I; Cremer C; Cremer T Chromosome Res; 2001; 9(7):541-67. PubMed ID: 11721953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Population studies in microorganisms. I. Evolution of diploidy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Adams J; Hansche PE Genetics; 1974 Feb; 76(2):327-38. PubMed ID: 4595645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The C- and G-value paradox with polyploidy, repeatomes, introns, phenomes and cell economy. Choi IY; Kwon EC; Kim NS Genes Genomics; 2020 Jul; 42(7):699-714. PubMed ID: 32445179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Haploid Selection Favors Suppressed Recombination Between Sex Chromosomes Despite Causing Biased Sex Ratios. Scott MF; Otto SP Genetics; 2017 Dec; 207(4):1631-1649. PubMed ID: 29051194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The evolutionary plasticity of chromosome metabolism allows adaptation to constitutive DNA replication stress. Fumasoni M; Murray AW Elife; 2020 Feb; 9():. PubMed ID: 32043971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Selection and the evolution of genetic life cycles. Jenkins CD Genetics; 1993 Feb; 133(2):401-10. PubMed ID: 8436279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Selection is no more efficient in haploid than in diploid life stages of an angiosperm and a moss. Szövényi P; Ricca M; Hock Z; Shaw JA; Shimizu KK; Wagner A Mol Biol Evol; 2013 Aug; 30(8):1929-39. PubMed ID: 23686659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]