These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37220567)

  • 1. Legal personhood and frozen embryos: implications for fertility patients and providers in post-
    Letterie G; Fox D
    J Law Biosci; 2023; 10(1):lsad006. PubMed ID: 37220567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Roe v Wade and the Threat to Fertility Care.
    Feinberg EC; Kawwass JF; Cedars MI
    Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Oct; 140(4):557-559. PubMed ID: 35861359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In re: the disposition of frozen embryos: 2022.
    Letterie G
    Fertil Steril; 2022 Mar; 117(3):477-480. PubMed ID: 35131103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
    Peterfy A
    J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selective pregnancy reduction: medical attitudes, legal implications, and a viable alternative.
    Gemmette EV
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1991; 16(2):383-95. PubMed ID: 1894927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Roe v Wade and the new Jane Crow: reproductive rights in the age of mass incarceration.
    Paltrow LM
    Am J Public Health; 2013 Jan; 103(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 23153159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.
    Benshoof J
    Womens Health Issues; 1993; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Post-Dobbs legal conundrums surrounding preimplantation in vitro fertilization embryo dispositions.
    Crockin S; Altman AB; Rinehart L
    Fertil Steril; 2023 Jan; 119(1):21-26. PubMed ID: 36494203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Will Webster redefine Roe v. Wade? The Supreme Court could use a Missouri case to begin limiting abortion rights.
    Chopko ME
    Health Prog; 1989 Jun; 70(5):58-64. PubMed ID: 10293331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Roe v. Wade and "partial birth abortion" bans.
    Reprod Freedom News; 1998 Jan; 7(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 12293726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Undue Burdens: State Abortion Laws in the United States, 1994-2022.
    Roth LM; Lee JH
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2023 Aug; 48(4):511-543. PubMed ID: 36693181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Human life symposium: a synopsis and critique.
    Taub S
    Law Med Health Care; 1982 Jun; 10(3):129-34. PubMed ID: 6920538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro fertilization and multiple pregnancies: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2006; 6(18):1-63. PubMed ID: 23074488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Beyond Abortion: The Consequences of Overturning
    Paltrow LM; Harris LH; Marshall MF
    Am J Bioeth; 2022 Aug; 22(8):3-15. PubMed ID: 35652910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Protecting Health after Dobbs.
    Clark BR
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2022 Nov; 52(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 36537270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2011.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2014 Nov; 63(10):1-28. PubMed ID: 25412164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How technology is reframing the abortion debate.
    Callahan D
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Feb; 16(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 3514547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond.
    Martin PA
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 8293219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. International dimensions of the Department of Justice arguments in the Webster case.
    Cook RJ
    Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(4):384-94. PubMed ID: 2628654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The laws that affect abortion in the United States and their impact on women's health.
    Harrison LK; Naylor KL
    Nurse Pract; 1991 Dec; 16(12):53-9. PubMed ID: 1798604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.