BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37220715)

  • 1. The impact of spatial variance on precision estimates in an auditory oddball paradigm.
    Yeark M; Paton B; Todd J
    Cortex; 2023 Aug; 165():1-13. PubMed ID: 37220715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hierarchical timescales of statistical learning revealed by mismatch negativity to auditory pattern deviations.
    Fitzgerald K; Todd J
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Nov; 120():25-34. PubMed ID: 30268879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory pre-attentive processing of Chinese tones.
    Yang LJ; Cao KL; Wei CG; Liu YZ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec; 121(23):2429-33. PubMed ID: 19102963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of conditional inference to reduce prediction error--a mismatch negativity (MMN) study.
    Todd J; Robinson J
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Aug; 48(10):3009-18. PubMed ID: 20547170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conditional deviant repetition in the oddball paradigm modulates processing at the level of P3a but not MMN.
    Coy N; Bendixen A; Grimm S; Roeber U; Schröger E
    Psychophysiology; 2024 Jun; 61(6):e14545. PubMed ID: 38366704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. First-impression bias effects on mismatch negativity to auditory spatial deviants.
    Fitzgerald K; Provost A; Todd J
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Apr; 55(4):. PubMed ID: 28972671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When the statistical MMN meets the physical MMN.
    Tsogli V; Jentschke S; Daikoku T; Koelsch S
    Sci Rep; 2019 Apr; 9(1):5563. PubMed ID: 30944387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can intensity modulation of the auditory response explain intensity-decrement mismatch negativity?
    O'Reilly JA
    Neurosci Lett; 2021 Nov; 764():136199. PubMed ID: 34461160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The sound of silence: Predictive error responses to unexpected sound omission in adults.
    Prete DA; Heikoop D; McGillivray JE; Reilly JP; Trainor LJ
    Eur J Neurosci; 2022 Apr; 55(8):1972-1985. PubMed ID: 35357048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Order effects in task-free learning: Tuning to information-carrying sound features.
    Todd J; Yeark M; Auriac P; Paton B; Winkler I
    Cortex; 2024 Mar; 172():114-124. PubMed ID: 38295554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory processing in autism spectrum disorder: Mismatch negativity deficits.
    Vlaskamp C; Oranje B; Madsen GF; Møllegaard Jepsen JR; Durston S; Cantio C; Glenthøj B; Bilenberg N
    Autism Res; 2017 Nov; 10(11):1857-1865. PubMed ID: 28639417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Atypical central auditory speech-sound discrimination in children who stutter as indexed by the mismatch negativity.
    Jansson-Verkasalo E; Eggers K; Järvenpää A; Suominen K; Van den Bergh B; De Nil L; Kujala T
    J Fluency Disord; 2014 Sep; 41():1-11. PubMed ID: 25066139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. That sounds awful! Does sound unpleasantness modulate the mismatch negativity and its habituation?
    Ringer H; Rösch SA; Roeber U; Deller J; Escera C; Grimm S
    Psychophysiology; 2024 Feb; 61(2):e14450. PubMed ID: 37779371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neuropsychological correlates of auditory perceptual inference: a mismatch negativity (MMN) study.
    Todd J; Myers R; Pirillo R; Drysdale K
    Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1310():113-23. PubMed ID: 19914219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implicit, intuitive, and explicit knowledge of abstract regularities in a sound sequence: an event-related brain potential study.
    van Zuijen TL; Simoens VL; Paavilainen P; Näätänen R; Tervaniemi M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1292-303. PubMed ID: 16859415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lasting first impressions: a conservative bias in automatic filters of the acoustic environment.
    Todd J; Provost A; Cooper G
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Oct; 49(12):3399-405. PubMed ID: 21872613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measurement of extensive auditory discrimination profiles using the mismatch negativity (MMN) of the auditory event-related potential (ERP).
    Pakarinen S; Takegata R; Rinne T; Huotilainen M; Näätänen R
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Jan; 118(1):177-85. PubMed ID: 17070103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fast detection of unexpected sound intensity decrements as revealed by human evoked potentials.
    Althen H; Grimm S; Escera C
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e28522. PubMed ID: 22163029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The lateralization and reliability of spatial mismatch negativity elicited by auditory deviants with virtual spatial location.
    Jiao X; Ying C; Tong S; Tang Y; Wang J; Sun J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2021 Jul; 165():92-100. PubMed ID: 33901512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.