These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37221141)

  • 21. Properties and pitfalls of weighting as an alternative to multilevel multiple imputation in cluster randomized trials with missing binary outcomes under covariate-dependent missingness.
    Turner EL; Yao L; Li F; Prague M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 May; 29(5):1338-1353. PubMed ID: 31293199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Adjusting for nonignorable missingness when estimating generalized additive models.
    Xie H
    Biom J; 2010 Apr; 52(2):186-200. PubMed ID: 20422637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Analysis of crossover designs for longitudinal binary data with ignorable and nonignorable dropout.
    Wang X; Chinchilli VM
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Jan; 31(1):119-138. PubMed ID: 34779672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Multinomial logistic regression with missing outcome data: An application to cancer subtypes.
    Wang CY; Hsu L
    Stat Med; 2020 Oct; 39(24):3299-3312. PubMed ID: 32628308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Estimation in closed capture-recapture models when covariates are missing at random.
    Lee SM; Hwang WH; de Dieu Tapsoba J
    Biometrics; 2016 Dec; 72(4):1294-1304. PubMed ID: 26909877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparisons of statistical methods for handling attrition in a follow-up visit with complex survey sampling.
    Cai J; Zeng D; Li H; Butera NM; Baldoni PL; Maitra P; Dong L
    Stat Med; 2023 May; 42(11):1641-1668. PubMed ID: 37183765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of multiple imputation approaches for handling missing covariate information in a case-cohort study with a binary outcome.
    Middleton M; Nguyen C; Moreno-Betancur M; Carlin JB; Lee KJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):87. PubMed ID: 35369860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Augmented Inverse Probability Weighting and the Double Robustness Property.
    Kurz CF
    Med Decis Making; 2022 Feb; 42(2):156-167. PubMed ID: 34225519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Combining multiple imputation and inverse-probability weighting.
    Seaman SR; White IR; Copas AJ; Li L
    Biometrics; 2012 Mar; 68(1):129-37. PubMed ID: 22050039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Missing Data in Marginal Structural Models: A Plasmode Simulation Study Comparing Multiple Imputation and Inverse Probability Weighting.
    Liu SH; Chrysanthopoulou SA; Chang Q; Hunnicutt JN; Lapane KL
    Med Care; 2019 Mar; 57(3):237-243. PubMed ID: 30664611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. On Inverse Probability Weighting for Nonmonotone Missing at Random Data.
    Sun B; Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2018; 113(521):369-379. PubMed ID: 30034062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Inverse probability weighting (IPW) for evaluating and "correcting" selection bias].
    Narduzzi S; Golini MN; Porta D; Stafoggia M; Forastiere F
    Epidemiol Prev; 2014; 38(5):335-41. PubMed ID: 25387748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Identifiability and estimation of causal effects in randomized trials with noncompliance and completely nonignorable missing data.
    Chen H; Geng Z; Zhou XH
    Biometrics; 2009 Sep; 65(3):675-82. PubMed ID: 18759847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Missing data approaches for probability regression models with missing outcomes with applications.
    Qi L; Sun Y
    J Stat Distrib Appl; 2014; 1():. PubMed ID: 26900543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Treatment comparison in randomized clinical trials with nonignorable missingness: A reverse regression approach.
    Zhang Z; Cheon K
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Apr; 26(2):776-795. PubMed ID: 25411324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect Estimation in Point-Exposure Studies with Binary Outcomes and High-Dimensional Covariate Data - A Comparison of Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting.
    Pang M; Schuster T; Filion KB; Schnitzer ME; Eberg M; Platt RW
    Int J Biostat; 2016 Nov; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 27889705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. On variance estimation of target population created by inverse probability weighting.
    Chen J; Chen R; Feng Y; Tan M; Chen P; Wu Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2024 Aug; 34(5):661-679. PubMed ID: 37621147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Missing confounding data in marginal structural models: a comparison of inverse probability weighting and multiple imputation.
    Moodie EE; Delaney JA; Lefebvre G; Platt RW
    Int J Biostat; 2008; 4(1):Article 13. PubMed ID: 22462119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dealing with indeterminate outcomes in antimalarial drug efficacy trials: a comparison between complete case analysis, multiple imputation and inverse probability weighting.
    Dahal P; Stepniewska K; Guerin PJ; D'Alessandro U; Price RN; Simpson JA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):215. PubMed ID: 31775647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of a weighting approach for performing sensitivity analysis after multiple imputation.
    Rezvan PH; White IR; Lee KJ; Carlin JB; Simpson JA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Oct; 15():83. PubMed ID: 26464305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.