161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37224394)
1. Percutaneous versus surgical approach to aortic valve replacement with coronary revascularization: A systematic review andmeta-analysis.
Guo Y; Zhang W; Wu H
Perfusion; 2023 May; ():2676591231178894. PubMed ID: 37224394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Coronary revascularization during treatment of severe aortic stenosis: A meta-analysis of the complete percutaneous approach (PCI plus TAVR) versus the complete surgical approach (CABG plus SAVR).
Tarus A; Tinica G; Bacusca A; Artene B; Popa IV; Burlacu A
J Card Surg; 2020 Aug; 35(8):2009-2016. PubMed ID: 32667080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Complete transcatheter versus surgical approach to aortic stenosis with coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Sakurai Y; Yokoyama Y; Fukuhara S; Takagi H; Kuno T
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2024 Apr; 167(4):1305-1313.e9. PubMed ID: 36150940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Trends and outcomes of combined percutaneous (TAVI+PCI) and surgical approach (SAVR+CABG) for patients with aortic valve and coronary artery disease: A National Readmission Database (NRD) analysis.
Ullah W; Sarvepalli D; Kumar A; Zahid S; Saleem S; Muhammadzai HZU; Khattak F; Block PC; Jaber WA; Shishehbor MH; Filby SJ; Devireddy C
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Nov; 102(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 37698396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Complex Coronary Artery Disease.
Alperi A; Mohammadi S; Campelo-Parada F; Munoz-Garcia E; Nombela-Franco L; Faroux L; Veiga G; Serra V; Fischer Q; Pascual I; Asmarats L; Gutiérrez E; Regueiro A; Vilalta V; Ribeiro HB; Matta A; Munoz-Garcia A; Armijo G; Metz D; De la Torre Hernandez JM; Rodenas-Alesina E; Urena M; Moris C; Arzamendi D; Perez-Fuentes P; Fernandez-Nofrerias E; Campanha-Borges DC; Mesnier J; Voisine P; Dumont E; Kalavrouziotis D; Rodés-Cabau J
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Nov; 14(22):2490-2499. PubMed ID: 34794656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement With Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.
Abugroun A; Osman M; Awadalla S; Klein LW
Am J Cardiol; 2020 Dec; 137():83-88. PubMed ID: 32991856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement- management of patients with significant coronary artery disease undergoing aortic valve interventions: surgical compared to catheter-based approaches in hybrid procedures.
Baumbach H; Schairer ER; Wachter K; Rustenbach C; Ahad S; Stan A; Hill S; Bramlage P; Franke UFW; Schäufele T
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2019 May; 19(1):108. PubMed ID: 31088373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. TransCatheter aortic valve implantation and fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention versus conventional surgical aortic valve replacement and coronary bypass grafting for treatment of patients with aortic valve stenosis and multivessel or advanced coronary disease: The transcatheter valve and vessels trial (TCW trial): Design and rationale.
Kedhi E; Rroku A; Hermanides RS; Dambrink JH; Singh S; Berg JT; van Ginkel DJ; Hudec M; Amoroso G; Amat-Santos IJ; Andreas M; Teles RC; Bonnet G; Van Belle E; Conradi L; van Garsse L; Wojakowski W; Voudris V; Sacha J; Cervinka P; Lipsic E; Somi S; Nombela-Franco L; Postma S; Piayda K; De Luca G; Malinofski K; Modine T
Am Heart J; 2024 Apr; 270():86-94. PubMed ID: 38309610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement and percutaneous coronary intervention versus surgical aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with severe aortic stenosis and concomitant coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kotronias RA; Bray JH; Scarsini R; Rajasundaram S; Terentes-Printzios D; De Maria GL; Kharbanda RK; Mamas MA; Bagur R; Banning AP
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Nov; 96(5):1113-1125. PubMed ID: 32662594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Aortic Stenosis and Coronary Artery Disease: Cost of Transcatheter vs Surgical Management.
Patlolla SH; Schaff HV; Dearani JA; Stulak JM; Crestanello JA; Greason KL
Ann Thorac Surg; 2022 Sep; 114(3):659-666. PubMed ID: 34560043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of a Complete Percutaneous Versus Surgical Approach to Aortic Valve Replacement and Revascularization in Patients at Intermediate Surgical Risk: Results From the Randomized SURTAVI Trial.
Søndergaard L; Popma JJ; Reardon MJ; Van Mieghem NM; Deeb GM; Kodali S; George I; Williams MR; Yakubov SJ; Kappetein AP; Serruys PW; Grube E; Schiltgen MB; Chang Y; Engstrøm T
Circulation; 2019 Oct; 140(16):1296-1305. PubMed ID: 31476897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Aortic Stenosis With Coronary Artery Disease: SAVR or TAVR-When and How?
Del Portillo JH; Farjat-Pasos J; Galhardo A; Avvedimento M; Mas-Peiro S; Mengi S; Nuche J; Mohammadi S; Rodés-Cabau J
Can J Cardiol; 2024 Feb; 40(2):218-234. PubMed ID: 37758014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparison on the prognosis of severe aortic stenosis patients treated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis].
Fan P; Ye YZ; Ma X
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2022 Sep; 50(9):913-919. PubMed ID: 36096710
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Swift SL; Puehler T; Misso K; Lang SH; Forbes C; Kleijnen J; Danner M; Kuhn C; Haneya A; Seoudy H; Cremer J; Frey N; Lutter G; Wolff R; Scheibler F; Wehkamp K; Frank D
BMJ Open; 2021 Dec; 11(12):e054222. PubMed ID: 34873012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in people with low surgical risk.
Kolkailah AA; Doukky R; Pelletier MP; Volgman AS; Kaneko T; Nabhan AF
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Dec; 12(12):CD013319. PubMed ID: 31860123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With and Without Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-An Updated Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.
Yassen M; Moustafa A; Venkataramany B; Schodowski E; Royfman R; Eltahawy E
Curr Probl Cardiol; 2023 Nov; 48(11):101980. PubMed ID: 37473936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transcatheter or surgical treatment of severe aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease: A comparative analysis from the Italian OBSERVANT study.
Barbanti M; Buccheri S; Capodanno D; D'Errigo P; Ranucci M; Rosato S; Santoro G; Fusco D; Tamburino C; Biancari F; Seccareccia F;
Int J Cardiol; 2018 Nov; 270():102-106. PubMed ID: 29903519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Staged versus concomitant transcatheter aortic valve replacement and percutaneous coronary intervention: A national analysis.
Tran Z; Hadaya J; Downey P; Sanaiha Y; Verma A; Shemin RJ; Benharash P
JTCVS Open; 2022 Jun; 10():148-161. PubMed ID: 36004248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In-hospital outcomes following percutaneous versus surgical intervention in the treatment of aortic stenosis and concomitant coronary artery disease.
McInerney A; García Márquez M; Tirado-Conte G; Bernal JL; Fernández-Pérez C; Jiménez-Quevedo P; Gonzalo N; Núñez-Gil I; Del Prado N; Escaned J; Fernández-Ortiz A; Elola J; Nombela-Franco L
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2023 Aug; 76(8):600-608. PubMed ID: 36669732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with previous coronary artery bypass surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ando T; Briasoulis A; Holmes AA; Afonso L; Schreiber T; Kondur A
Int J Cardiol; 2016 Jul; 215():14-9. PubMed ID: 27104920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
