These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37224720)

  • 41. Human frequency-following responses: representation of second formant transitions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Plyler PN; Ananthanarayan AK
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001; 12(10):523-33. PubMed ID: 11791939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The perception of complex harmonic patterns by profoundly hearing-impaired listeners.
    van Son N; Bosman AJ; Lamoré PJ; Smoorenburg GF
    Audiology; 1993; 32(5):308-27. PubMed ID: 8216030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Detection, direction discrimination, and off-frequency interference of center-frequency modulations and glides for vowel formants.
    Lyzenga J; Carlyon RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 May; 117(5):3042-53. PubMed ID: 15957773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Formant-frequency matching between sounds with different bandwidths and on different fundamental frequencies.
    Dissard P; Darwin CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jul; 110(1):409-15. PubMed ID: 11508966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Speech coding in the auditory nerve: V. Vowels in background noise.
    Delgutte B; Kiang NY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Mar; 75(3):908-18. PubMed ID: 6707320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. An investigation of vowel organization in speakers with severe and profound hearing loss.
    McCaffrey HA; Sussman HM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Aug; 37(4):938-51. PubMed ID: 7967578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Relationships between electrophysiological characteristic of speech evoked auditory brainstem response and Mandarin monosyllable discriminative ability at different hearing impairment].
    Fu QY; Liang Y; Zou A; Wang T; Zhao XD; Wan J
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Apr; 51(4):247-55. PubMed ID: 27095715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Perception of spectral contrast by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Dreisbach LE; Leek MR; Lentz JJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Aug; 48(4):910-21. PubMed ID: 16378482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Coherence masking protection in speech sounds: the role of formant synchrony.
    Gordon PC
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Feb; 59(2):232-42. PubMed ID: 9055618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effects of hearing loss and spectral shaping on identification and neural response patterns of stop-consonant stimuli in young adults.
    Harkrider AW; Plyler PN; Hedrick MS
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 19125025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Perception of front vowels: the role of harmonics in the first formant region.
    Assmann PF; Nearey TM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Feb; 81(2):520-34. PubMed ID: 3558970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The relative importance of spectral tilt in monophthongs and diphthongs.
    Kiefte M; Kluender KR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Mar; 117(3 Pt 1):1395-404. PubMed ID: 15807027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effects of cochlear hearing loss on perceptual grouping cues in competing-vowel perception.
    Rossi-Katz JA; Arehart KH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Oct; 118(4):2588-98. PubMed ID: 16266179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Extracting spectral envelopes: formant frequency matching between sounds on different and modulated fundamental frequencies.
    Dissard P; Darwin CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Feb; 107(2):960-9. PubMed ID: 10687705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Topographic and temporal indices of vowel spectral envelope extraction in the human auditory cortex.
    Diesch E; Luce T
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2000 Sep; 12(5):878-93. PubMed ID: 11054929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity as a predictor of speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG; Mehraei G; Shamma S; Gallun FJ; Theodoroff SM; Leek MR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):293-306. PubMed ID: 23636210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Distorted Tonotopy Severely Degrades Neural Representations of Connected Speech in Noise following Acoustic Trauma.
    Parida S; Heinz MG
    J Neurosci; 2022 Feb; 42(8):1477-1490. PubMed ID: 34983817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Modeling the perception of concurrent vowels: vowels with the same fundamental frequency.
    Assmann PF; Summerfield Q
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):327-38. PubMed ID: 2921415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Role of fundamental frequency differences in the perceptual separation of competing vowel sounds by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with hearing loss.
    Arehart KH; King CA; McLean-Mudgett KS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Dec; 40(6):1434-44. PubMed ID: 9430762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.