These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37225072)

  • 1. The impact of different sperm preparation methods on clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in intrauterine insemination cycles: a retrospective single-center cohort study.
    Vagios S; Velmahos CS; Cherouveim P; Dimitriadis I; Bormann CL
    Fertil Steril; 2023 Sep; 120(3 Pt 2):617-625. PubMed ID: 37225072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination.
    Boomsma CM; Heineman MJ; Cohlen BJ; Farquhar C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; (3):CD004507. PubMed ID: 15266536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination.
    Boomsma CM; Cohlen BJ; Farquhar C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Oct; 10(10):CD004507. PubMed ID: 31612995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination.
    Boomsma CM; Heineman MJ; Cohlen BJ; Farquhar C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Oct; (4):CD004507. PubMed ID: 17943816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of sperm morphology on the outcome of intrauterine insemination cycles with gonadotropins in unexplained and male subfertility.
    Erdem M; Erdem A; Mutlu MF; Ozisik S; Yildiz S; Guler I; Karakaya C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Feb; 197():120-4. PubMed ID: 26745391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intrauterine insemination versus intracervical insemination in donor sperm treatment.
    Kop PA; Mochtar MH; O'Brien PA; Van der Veen F; van Wely M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Jan; 1(1):CD000317. PubMed ID: 29368795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retrospective comparison of the semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination: Swim-up versus density gradient method.
    Çil N; Kabukçu C; Çabuş Ü; Turan T; Mete GA
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2022 Mar; 51(3):102321. PubMed ID: 35063717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intrauterine insemination performance characteristics and post-processing total motile sperm count in relation to live birth for couples with unexplained infertility in a randomised, multicentre clinical trial.
    Hansen KR; Peck JD; Coward RM; Wild RA; Trussell JC; Krawetz SA; Diamond MP; Legro RS; Coutifaris C; Alvero R; Robinson RD; Casson P; Christman GM; Santoro N; Zhang H
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Jun; 35(6):1296-1305. PubMed ID: 32432326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative efficacy of density gradient and swim-up methods of semen preparation in intrauterine insemination cycles.
    Butt F; Chohan MA
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2016 Aug; 66(8):932-7. PubMed ID: 27524522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy and pregnancy outcome of two methods of semen preparation for intrauterine insemination: a prospective randomized study.
    Morshedi M; Duran HE; Taylor S; Oehninger S
    Fertil Steril; 2003 Jun; 79 Suppl 3():1625-32. PubMed ID: 12801569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intracervical insemination versus intrauterine insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm in the natural cycle: a randomized controlled trial.
    Kop PAL; van Wely M; Nap A; Soufan AT; de Melker AA; Mol BWJ; Bernardus RE; De Brucker M; Janssens PMW; Pieters JJPM; Repping S; van der Veen F; Mochtar MH
    Hum Reprod; 2022 May; 37(6):1175-1182. PubMed ID: 35459949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationship between semen regurgitation and pregnancy rates with intrauterine insemination.
    Craig LB; Arya S; Burks HR; Warta K; Jarshaw C; Hansen KR; Peck JD
    Fertil Steril; 2021 Dec; 116(6):1526-1531. PubMed ID: 34417056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of sperm separation methods before intrauterine insemination on pregnancy outcomes and live birth rates: Differences between the swim-up and microfluidic chip techniques.
    Feyzioglu BS; Avul Z
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Nov; 102(46):e36042. PubMed ID: 37986402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is intrauterine insemination a viable treatment option for women over 43 years old? An analysis by ovarian stimulation protocol and sperm source.
    Ruiter-Ligeti J; Dahan MH; Steiner N; Volodarsky-Perel A; Buckett W
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2020 Dec; 37(12):3103-3107. PubMed ID: 33107579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The relationship of total progressive motile sperm count with the outcome of IUI? An analysis of 5171 cycles.
    Lin H; Li Y; Ou S; Jiao X; Wang W; Haahr T; Humaidan P; Zhang Q
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2022 Nov; 38(11):954-959. PubMed ID: 36271782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination in infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A comparison of drugs.
    Huang S; Du X; Wang R; Li R; Wang H; Luo L; O'Leary S; Qiao J; Mol BWJ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Dec; 231():117-121. PubMed ID: 30366343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of HCG-Triggered Ovulation on Pregnancy Outcomes in Intrauterine Insemination: An Analysis of 5,610 First IUI Natural Cycles With Donor Sperm in China.
    Wan JP; Wang ZJ; Sheng Y; Chen W; Guo QQ; Xu J; Fan HR; Sun M
    Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2020; 11():423. PubMed ID: 32774325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination in women of advanced reproductive age: a systematic review of the literature.
    Nesbit CB; Blanchette-Porter M; Esfandiari N
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2022 Jul; 39(7):1445-1491. PubMed ID: 35731321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assisted reproductive technologies for male subfertility.
    Cissen M; Bensdorp A; Cohlen BJ; Repping S; de Bruin JP; van Wely M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Feb; 2(2):CD000360. PubMed ID: 26915339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Donor IUI is equally effective for heterosexual couples, single women and lesbians, but autologous IUI does worse.
    Soares SR; Cruz M; Vergara V; Requena A; García-Velasco JA
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Nov; 34(11):2184-2192. PubMed ID: 31711203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.