These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37226042)

  • 1. Are irrelevant items actively deleted from visual working memory?: No evidence from repulsion and attraction effects in dual-retrocue tasks.
    Rhilinger JP; Xu C; Rose NS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Jul; 85(5):1499-1516. PubMed ID: 37226042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neural interactions in working memory explain decreased recall precision and similarity-based feature repulsion.
    Johnson JS; van Lamsweerde AE; Dineva E; Spencer JP
    Sci Rep; 2022 Oct; 12(1):17756. PubMed ID: 36272987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Influence of Active Removal from Working Memory on Serial Dependence.
    Shan J; Postle BR
    J Cogn; 2022; 5(1):31. PubMed ID: 36072093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficient Coding in Visual Working Memory Accounts for Stimulus-Specific Variations in Recall.
    Taylor R; Bays PM
    J Neurosci; 2018 Aug; 38(32):7132-7142. PubMed ID: 30006363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breaking the cardinal rule: The impact of interitem interaction and attentional priority on the cardinal biases in orientation working memory.
    Bae GY
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Oct; 84(7):2186-2194. PubMed ID: 34658001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age Differences in the Efficiency of Filtering and Ignoring Distraction in Visual Working Memory.
    Maniglia MR; Souza AS
    Brain Sci; 2020 Aug; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 32824098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Neural Consequences of Attentional Prioritization of Internal Representations in Visual Working Memory.
    Sahan MI; Sheldon AD; Postle BR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 May; 32(5):917-944. PubMed ID: 31851592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Task-irrelevant financial losses inhibit the removal of information from working memory.
    Fallon SJ; Dolfen N; Parolo F; Zokaei N; Husain M
    Sci Rep; 2019 Feb; 9(1):1673. PubMed ID: 30737421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The time course of encoding and maintenance of task-relevant versus irrelevant object features in working memory.
    Bocincova A; Johnson JS
    Cortex; 2019 Feb; 111():196-209. PubMed ID: 30508678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual working memory items drift apart due to active, not passive, maintenance.
    Scotti PS; Hong Y; Leber AB; Golomb JD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Dec; 150(12):2506-2524. PubMed ID: 34014755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Benefits of flexible prioritization in working memory can arise without costs.
    Myers NE; Chekroud SR; Stokes MG; Nobre AC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Mar; 44(3):398-411. PubMed ID: 28816476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multiple and Dissociable Effects of Sensory History on Working-Memory Performance.
    Hajonides JE; van Ede F; Stokes MG; Nobre AC; Myers NE
    J Neurosci; 2023 Apr; 43(15):2730-2740. PubMed ID: 36868858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural Reinstatement Tracks Spread of Attention between Object Features in Working Memory.
    Printzlau FAB; Myers NE; Manohar SG; Stokes MG
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Aug; 34(9):1681-1701. PubMed ID: 35704549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Awareness of the relative quality of spatial working memory representations.
    Li AY; Sprague TC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Jul; 85(5):1710-1721. PubMed ID: 36720782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An adaptive perspective on visual working memory distortions.
    Chunharas C; Rademaker RL; Brady TF; Serences JT
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Oct; 151(10):2300-2323. PubMed ID: 35191726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The contributions of visual and central attention to visual working memory.
    Souza AS; Oberauer K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):1897-1916. PubMed ID: 28600676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ignoring versus updating in working memory reveal differential roles of attention and feature binding.
    Fallon SJ; Mattiesing RM; Dolfen N; Manohar SG; Husain M
    Cortex; 2018 Oct; 107():50-63. PubMed ID: 29402388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interactions between visual working memory representations.
    Bae GY; Luck SJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Nov; 79(8):2376-2395. PubMed ID: 28836145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neural Architecture for Feature Binding in Visual Working Memory.
    Schneegans S; Bays PM
    J Neurosci; 2017 Apr; 37(14):3913-3925. PubMed ID: 28270569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.