These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37227323)

  • 1. The reliability of analytical reference lines for determining esthetically pleasing lip position: An assessment of consistency, sensitivity, and specificity.
    Ng JHH; Singh P; Wang Z; Yang Y; Khambay BS; Gu M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Jul; 164(1):e14-e26. PubMed ID: 37227323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparisons of the five analytic reference lines of the horizontal lip position: their consistency and sensitivity.
    Hsu BS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Oct; 104(4):355-60. PubMed ID: 8213657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Soft tissue profile in Anatolian Turkish adults: Part I. Evaluation of horizontal lip position using different soft tissue analyses.
    Erbay EF; Caniklioğlu CM; Erbay SK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Jan; 121(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 11786873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The beauty perspective of the horizontal lip position].
    Hsu BS; Kuang SH
    Zhonghua Ya Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi; 1990 Mar; 9(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 2131158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of White and Chinese perception of esthetic Chinese lip position.
    Chong HT; Thea KW; Descallar J; Chen Y; Dalci O; Wong R; Darendeliler MA
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Mar; 84(2):246-53. PubMed ID: 23914821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Photos vs silhouettes for evaluation of African American profile esthetics.
    Hockley A; Weinstein M; Borislow AJ; Braitman LE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Feb; 141(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 22284283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of laterality on esthetic preferences of orthodontists, maxillofacial surgeons, and laypeople regarding the lip position and facial convexity: a psychometric clinical trial.
    Mousavi SM; Saeidi Ghorani P; Deilamani A; Rakhshan V
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Dec; 23(4):439-451. PubMed ID: 31446526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Photos vs silhouettes for evaluation of profile esthetics between white and black evaluators.
    Pithon MM; Silva IS; Almeida IO; Nery MS; de Souza ML; Barbosa G; Dos Santos AF; da Silva Coqueiro R
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Mar; 84(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 23957665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Establishment of South Indian soft tissue cephalometric norms using profile angles and esthetic analysis.
    Biradar AK; Madanagowda SB
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e104-13. PubMed ID: 21490979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of preferences in lip position using computer animated imaging.
    Hier LA; Evans CA; BeGole EA; Giddon DB
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Jun; 69(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 10371428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of the integrated radiograph-photograph method to obtain natural head position in cephalometric diagnosis.
    Dvortsin DP; Ye Q; Pruim GJ; Dijkstra PU; Ren Y
    Angle Orthod; 2011 Sep; 81(5):889-94. PubMed ID: 21542723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Esthetic preferences of European American, Hispanic American, Japanese, and African judges for soft-tissue profiles.
    Nomura M; Motegi E; Hatch JP; Gakunga PT; Ng'ang'a PM; Rugh JD; Yamaguchi H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4 Suppl):S87-95. PubMed ID: 19362272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ricketts' E-line profile preferences among Nigerian orthodontists, orthodontic trainees, and a young undergraduate students' population.
    Otuyemi O; Afolabi D; Oyewole T
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2022 Apr; 25(4):541-547. PubMed ID: 35439916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Soft tissue profile in Anatolian Turkish adults: Part II. Comparison of different soft tissue analyses in the evaluation of beauty.
    Erbay EF; Caniklioğlu CM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Jan; 121(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 11786874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can commonly used profile planes be used to evaluate changes in lower lip position?
    Buschang PH; Fretty K; Campbell PM
    Angle Orthod; 2011 Jul; 81(4):557-63. PubMed ID: 21299383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A photographic study of the soft-tissue profile of the Negro population.
    Sushner NI
    Am J Orthod; 1977 Oct; 72(4):373-85. PubMed ID: 269666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correlations between cephalometric and photographic measurements of facial attractiveness in Chinese and US patients after orthodontic treatment.
    Oh HS; Korn EL; Zhang X; Liu Y; Xu T; Boyd R; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):762.e1-14; discussion 762-3. PubMed ID: 19962590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative Evaluation of Horizontal Lip Position With Ricketts Esthetic Plane in Preschool and School-Going Children of Bankura, West Bengal: A Craniofacial Anthropometric Study.
    Ahuja A; Ahuja V; Verma J; Arunima A; Thosar NR
    Cureus; 2024 Feb; 16(2):e55015. PubMed ID: 38550482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outcome of orthognathic surgery in Chinese patients. A subjective and objective evaluation.
    Chew MT; Sandham A; Soh J; Wong HB
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Sep; 77(5):845-50. PubMed ID: 17685780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The perception of facial aesthetics in a young Spanish population.
    Macías Gago AB; Romero Maroto M; Crego A
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):335-9. PubMed ID: 21447783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.