143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37229655)
1. The 5-year risk of recurrence of grade 2/3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after treatment in a population screening programme by human papillomavirus status: A cohort study in central Italy.
Visioli CB; Iossa A; Gorini G; Mantellini P; Lelli L; Auzzi N; Pierro CD; Carozzi FM; Zappa M
J Med Screen; 2023 Dec; 30(4):191-200. PubMed ID: 37229655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. HPV testing compared with routine cytology in cervical screening: long-term follow-up of ARTISTIC RCT.
Gilham C; Sargent A; Kitchener HC; Peto J
Health Technol Assess; 2019 Jun; 23(28):1-44. PubMed ID: 31219027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of the risk of recurrent disease-a 16-year follow-up study.
Alder S; Megyessi D; Sundström K; Östensson E; Mints M; Belkić K; Arbyn M; Andersson S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 222(2):172.e1-172.e12. PubMed ID: 31473226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimising follow-up strategy based on cytology and human papillomavirus after fertility-sparing surgery for early stage cervical cancer: a nationwide, population-based, retrospective cohort study.
Schuurman TN; Schaafsma M; To KH; Verhoef VMJ; Sikorska K; Siebers AG; Wenzel HHB; Bleeker MCG; Roes EM; Zweemer RP; de Vos van Steenwijk PJ; Yigit R; Beltman JJ; Zusterzeel PLM; Lok CAR; Bekkers RLM; Mom CH; van Trommel NE
Lancet Oncol; 2023 Dec; 24(12):1349-1358. PubMed ID: 37952541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of Screening With Primary Cervical HPV Testing vs Cytology Testing on High-grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia at 48 Months: The HPV FOCAL Randomized Clinical Trial.
Ogilvie GS; van Niekerk D; Krajden M; Smith LW; Cook D; Gondara L; Ceballos K; Quinlan D; Lee M; Martin RE; Gentile L; Peacock S; Stuart GCE; Franco EL; Coldman AJ
JAMA; 2018 Jul; 320(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 29971397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk of cervical precancer among HPV-negative women in the Netherlands and its association with previous HPV and cytology results: A follow-up analysis of a randomized screening study.
Inturrisi F; Rozendaal L; Veldhuijzen NJ; Heideman DAM; Meijer CJLM; Berkhof J
PLoS Med; 2022 Oct; 19(10):e1004115. PubMed ID: 36306283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The IMproving Primary Screening And Colposcopy Triage trial: human papillomavirus, cervical cytology, and histopathologic results from the baseline and 1-year follow-up phase.
Safaeian M; Wright TC; Stoler MH; Ranger-Moore J; Rehm S; Aslam S; Fang Q; Volkir P; Ridder R
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Sep; 225(3):278.e1-278.e16. PubMed ID: 33852886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Role of p16(INK4a) cytology testing as an adjunct to enhance the diagnostic specificity and accuracy in human papillomavirus-positive women within an organized cervical cancer screening program.
Gustinucci D; Passamonti B; Cesarini E; Butera D; Palmieri EA; Bulletti S; Carlani A; Staiano M; D'Amico MR; D'Angelo V; Di Dato E; Martinelli N; Malaspina M; Spita N; Tintori B; Fulciniti F
Acta Cytol; 2012; 56(5):506-14. PubMed ID: 23075891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Benefit and burden in the Dutch cytology-based vs high-risk human papillomavirus-based cervical cancer screening program.
Loopik DL; Koenjer LM; Siebers AG; Melchers WJG; Bekkers RLM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 224(2):200.e1-200.e9. PubMed ID: 32800820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk of progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 in human papillomavirus-vaccinated and unvaccinated women: a population-based cohort study.
Krog L; Lycke KD; Kahlert J; Randrup TH; Jensen PT; Rositch AF; Hammer A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Apr; 230(4):430.e1-430.e11. PubMed ID: 38569830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Primary cervical cancer screening with an HPV mRNA test: a prospective cohort study.
Sørbye SW; Fismen S; Gutteberg TJ; Mortensen ES; Skjeldestad FE
BMJ Open; 2016 Aug; 6(8):e011981. PubMed ID: 27515759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of recurrence after treatment for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: the role of human papillomavirus testing and age at conisation.
Verguts J; Bronselaer B; Donders G; Arbyn M; Van Eldere J; Drijkoningen M; Poppe W
BJOG; 2006 Nov; 113(11):1303-7. PubMed ID: 16978225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dual staining for p16/Ki-67 to detect high-grade cervical lesions: Results from the Screening Triage Ascertaining Intraepithelial Neoplasia by Immunostain Testing study.
El-Zein M; Gotlieb W; Gilbert L; Hemmings R; Behr MA; Franco EL;
Int J Cancer; 2021 Jan; 148(2):492-501. PubMed ID: 32781481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term cervical precancer outcomes after a negative DNA- or RNA-based human papillomavirus test result.
Strang THR; Gottschlich A; Cook DA; Smith LW; Gondara L; Franco EL; van Niekerk DJ; Ogilvie GS; Krajden M
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):511.e1-511.e7. PubMed ID: 34081897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Human papillomavirus test with cytology triage in organized screening for cervical cancer.
Veijalainen O; Kares S; Kujala P; Tirkkonen M; Vuento R; Kholová I; Luukkaala T; Osuala V; Mäenpää J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Nov; 95(11):1220-1227. PubMed ID: 27591407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2+ (CIN2+) using HPV DNA testing after a diagnosis of atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance (ASC-US) in Catalonia, Spain.
Ibáñez R; Moreno-Crespi J; Sardà M; Autonell J; Fibla M; Gutiérrez C; Lloveras B; Alejo M; Català I; Alameda F; Casas M; Bosch FX; de Sanjosé S
BMC Infect Dis; 2012 Jan; 12():25. PubMed ID: 22280073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Safety of extending screening intervals beyond five years in cervical screening programmes with testing for high risk human papillomavirus: 14 year follow-up of population based randomised cohort in the Netherlands.
Dijkstra MG; van Zummeren M; Rozendaal L; van Kemenade FJ; Helmerhorst TJ; Snijders PJ; Meijer CJ; Berkhof J
BMJ; 2016 Oct; 355():i4924. PubMed ID: 27702796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long term duration of protective effect for HPV negative women: follow-up of primary HPV screening randomised controlled trial.
Elfström KM; Smelov V; Johansson AL; Eklund C; Nauclér P; Arnheim-Dahlström L; Dillner J
BMJ; 2014 Jan; 348():g130. PubMed ID: 24435414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection Rate of High-Grade Cervical Neoplasia and Cost-Effectiveness of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Genotyping with Reflex Liquid-based Cytology in Cervical Cancer Screening.
Tay SK; Lin LE; Goh RC
Ann Acad Med Singap; 2017 Jul; 46(7):267-273. PubMed ID: 28821890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
