129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37229880)
1. Survival outcomes of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer with incidentally identified high-risk factors.
Kim NR; Kim SI; Suh DH; Kim HS; Kim K; Chung HH; No JH; Kim YB; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Choi CH; Lee M
Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Jul; 174():224-230. PubMed ID: 37229880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy on survival outcome in patients with FIGO stage IB cervical cancer: A matching study of two institutional hospitals in Korea.
Kim SI; Lee M; Lee S; Suh DH; Kim HS; Kim K; Chung HH; No JH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Kim YB
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Oct; 155(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 31383569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Survival rate comparisons amongst cervical cancer patients treated with an open, robotic-assisted or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: A five year experience.
Mendivil AA; Rettenmaier MA; Abaid LN; Brown JV; Micha JP; Lopez KL; Goldstein BH
Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 25(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 26409687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparotomic radical hysterectomy versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy using vaginal colpotomy for the management of stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
Yang EJ; Kim NR; Lee AJ; Shim SH; Lee SJ
Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Feb; 101(8):e28911. PubMed ID: 35212297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: long-term survival outcomes in a matched cohort study.
Nam JH; Park JY; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT
Ann Oncol; 2012 Apr; 23(4):903-11. PubMed ID: 21841155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, excluding robotic assisted versus open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Marchand G; Masoud AT; Abdelsattar A; King A; Ulibarri H; Parise J; Arroyo A; Coriell C; Goetz S; Moir C; Moberly A; Govindan M
Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):273. PubMed ID: 36609438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤2 cm.
Chen X; Zhao N; Ye P; Chen J; Nan X; Zhao H; Zhou K; Zhang Y; Xue J; Zhou H; Shang H; Zhu H; Leanne VM; Yan X
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):564-571. PubMed ID: 32276941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in the treatment of patients with stage I a2-II b cervical cancer].
Yang L; Yang P; Li D; Cai J; Shen Y; Dong W; Zhang Y; Xiong Z; Chen H; Min J; Wang H; Wang Y; Liang W; Wang Z
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):915-22. PubMed ID: 26887875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Total laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in stage IA2-IB1 cervical cancer: disease recurrence and survival comparison.
Toptas T; Simsek T
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2014 Jun; 24(6):373-8. PubMed ID: 24742012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage IB and IIA cervical cancer with tumor diameter of 3 cm or greater.
Kong TW; Chang SJ; Lee J; Paek J; Ryu HS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Feb; 24(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 24407571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of modified radical laparoscopic hysterectomy versus open radical hysterectomy on short-term clinical outcomes in early-stage cervical cancer: a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial.
Lv X; Ding B; Xu J; Shen Y
World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jun; 21(1):167. PubMed ID: 37270549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of oncological outcomes and major complications between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer with a tumour size less than 2 cm.
Li Z; Chen C; Liu P; Duan H; Liu M; Xu Y; Li P; Zhang W; Jiang H; Bin X; Lang J
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Aug; 47(8):2125-2133. PubMed ID: 33781626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical Outcomes in Early Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Nerve Plane-sparing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy.
Zhao D; Li B; Wang Y; Liu S; Zhang Y; Yuan G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(3):687-696. PubMed ID: 31075445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Effects of colpotomic approaches on prognosis and recurrence sites of stage Ⅰa2-Ⅱa2 cervical cancer after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy].
Zhou D; Li YD; Ling KJ; Wang RW; Wang YZ; Tang S; Liang ZQ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Jan; 58(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 36720615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Role of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Early-Stage Adenocarcinoma of the Uterine Cervix.
Park JY; Kim D; Suh DS; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):825-833. PubMed ID: 27503491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy for elderly patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
Park JY; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 207(3):195.e1-8. PubMed ID: 22939724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in FIGO 2018 early-stage cervical adenocarcinoma: Long-term survival outcomes after propensity score matching.
Yin Z; Cui Z; Kang S; Ji M; Li D; Chen B; Zhan X; Li W; Liu P; Chen C
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Dec; 49(12):2849-2859. PubMed ID: 37658744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 and tumor size <2 cm cervical cancer with visible or invisible tumors: a multicentre retrospective study.
Li P; Chen L; Ni Y; Liu J; Li D; Guo J; Liu Z; Jin S; Xu Y; Li Z; Wang L; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
J Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Mar; 32(2):e17. PubMed ID: 33470062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for low-risk cervical cancer: a multicentre retrospective study.
Li Z; Chen C; Liu P; Lu A; Zhao H; Zhan X; Duan H; Li P; Zhao W; Yao J; Li D; Jiang H; Liu M; Bin X; Lang J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Feb; 305(2):449-458. PubMed ID: 34406459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
