191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37230209)
1. EEG responses induced by cerebellar TMS at rest and during visuomotor adaptation.
Fong PY; Spampinato D; Michell K; Mancuso M; Brown K; Ibáñez J; Santo AD; Latorre A; Bhatia K; Rothwell JC; Rocchi L
Neuroimage; 2023 Jul; 275():120188. PubMed ID: 37230209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cerebellar-Motor Cortex Connectivity: One or Two Different Networks?
Spampinato DA; Celnik PA; Rothwell JC
J Neurosci; 2020 May; 40(21):4230-4239. PubMed ID: 32312885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cerebellar noninvasive neuromodulation influences the reactivity of the contralateral primary motor cortex and surrounding areas: a TMS-EMG-EEG study.
L R; DA S; V P; M O; Ps B; Jc R; Ep C
Cerebellum; 2023 Jun; 22(3):319-331. PubMed ID: 35355218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Utilising TMS-EEG to Assess the Response to Cerebellar-Brain Inhibition.
Sasaki R; Hand BJ; Liao WY; Rogasch NC; Fernandez L; Semmler JG; Opie GM
Cerebellum; 2023 Aug; 22(4):544-558. PubMed ID: 35661100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cerebellar-M1 Connectivity Changes Associated with Motor Learning Are Somatotopic Specific.
Spampinato DA; Block HJ; Celnik PA
J Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 37(9):2377-2386. PubMed ID: 28137969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evoked EEG Responses to TMS Targeting Regions Outside the Primary Motor Cortex and Their Test-Retest Reliability.
Song Y; Gordon PC; Metsomaa J; Rostami M; Belardinelli P; Ziemann U
Brain Topogr; 2024 Jan; 37(1):19-36. PubMed ID: 37996562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing cerebellar-cortical connectivity using concurrent TMS-EEG: a feasibility study.
Fernandez L; Biabani M; Do M; Opie GM; Hill AT; Barham MP; Teo WP; Byrne LK; Rogasch NC; Enticott PG
J Neurophysiol; 2021 May; 125(5):1768-1787. PubMed ID: 33788622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation: the role of coil geometry and tissue depth.
Hardwick RM; Lesage E; Miall RC
Brain Stimul; 2014; 7(5):643-9. PubMed ID: 24924734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The correspondence between EMG and EEG measures of changes in cortical excitability following transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Biabani M; Fornito A; Coxon JP; Fulcher BD; Rogasch NC
J Physiol; 2021 Jun; 599(11):2907-2932. PubMed ID: 33599980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Removing artefacts from TMS-EEG recordings using independent component analysis: importance for assessing prefrontal and motor cortex network properties.
Rogasch NC; Thomson RH; Farzan F; Fitzgibbon BM; Bailey NW; Hernandez-Pavon JC; Daskalakis ZJ; Fitzgerald PB
Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 101():425-39. PubMed ID: 25067813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Disentangling EEG responses to TMS due to cortical and peripheral activations.
Rocchi L; Di Santo A; Brown K; Ibáñez J; Casula E; Rawji V; Di Lazzaro V; Koch G; Rothwell J
Brain Stimul; 2021; 14(1):4-18. PubMed ID: 33127580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of cortical EEG responses to realistic sham versus real TMS of human motor cortex.
Gordon PC; Desideri D; Belardinelli P; Zrenner C; Ziemann U
Brain Stimul; 2018; 11(6):1322-1330. PubMed ID: 30143417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-lasting inhibition of cerebellar output.
Popa T; Russo M; Meunier S
Brain Stimul; 2010 Jul; 3(3):161-9. PubMed ID: 20633445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reflecting the causes of variability of EEG responses elicited by cerebellar TMS.
Gaßmann L; Gordon PC; Ziemann U
Neuroimage; 2023 Nov; 281():120368. PubMed ID: 37696424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Neck muscle fatigue impacts plasticity and sensorimotor integration in cerebellum and motor cortex in response to novel motor skill acquisition.
Zabihhosseinian M; Yielder P; Berkers V; Ambalavanar U; Holmes M; Murphy B
J Neurophysiol; 2020 Sep; 124(3):844-855. PubMed ID: 32755363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing effective connectivity of the cerebellum with cerebral cortex using TMS-EEG.
Gassmann L; Gordon PC; Ziemann U
Brain Stimul; 2022; 15(6):1354-1369. PubMed ID: 36180039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characterizing and minimizing the contribution of sensory inputs to TMS-evoked potentials.
Biabani M; Fornito A; Mutanen TP; Morrow J; Rogasch NC
Brain Stimul; 2019; 12(6):1537-1552. PubMed ID: 31377097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Recording brain responses to TMS of primary motor cortex by EEG - utility of an optimized sham procedure.
Gordon PC; Jovellar DB; Song Y; Zrenner C; Belardinelli P; Siebner HR; Ziemann U
Neuroimage; 2021 Dec; 245():118708. PubMed ID: 34743050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative Evaluation of Cerebellar Function in Multiple System Atrophy with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.
Shirota Y; Hanajima R; Shimizu T; Terao Y; Tsuji S; Ugawa Y
Cerebellum; 2022 Apr; 21(2):219-224. PubMed ID: 34128209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Induce Cerebellum Plasticity? Feasibility, Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Electrophysiological Approach.
Naro A; Leo A; Russo M; Cannavò A; Milardi D; Bramanti P; Calabrò RS
Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(3):388-395. PubMed ID: 26946958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
