These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37231022)

  • 1. Simple combination of multiple somatic variant callers to increase accuracy.
    Trevarton AJ; Chang JT; Symmans WF
    Sci Rep; 2023 May; 13(1):8463. PubMed ID: 37231022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variant callers for next-generation sequencing data: a comparison study.
    Liu X; Han S; Wang Z; Gelernter J; Yang BZ
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e75619. PubMed ID: 24086590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of Nine Somatic Variant Callers for Detection of Somatic Mutations in Exome and Targeted Deep Sequencing Data.
    Krøigård AB; Thomassen M; Lænkholm AV; Kruse TA; Larsen MJ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151664. PubMed ID: 27002637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of post-alignment processing in variant discovery from whole exome data.
    Tian S; Yan H; Kalmbach M; Slager SL
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):403. PubMed ID: 27716037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. SomaticCombiner: improving the performance of somatic variant calling based on evaluation tests and a consensus approach.
    Wang M; Luo W; Jones K; Bian X; Williams R; Higson H; Wu D; Hicks B; Yeager M; Zhu B
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jul; 10(1):12898. PubMed ID: 32732891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy and reproducibility of somatic point mutation calling in clinical-type targeted sequencing data.
    Karimnezhad A; Palidwor GA; Thavorn K; Stewart DJ; Campbell PA; Lo B; Perkins TJ
    BMC Med Genomics; 2020 Oct; 13(1):156. PubMed ID: 33059707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance assessment of variant calling pipelines using human whole exome sequencing and simulated data.
    Kumaran M; Subramanian U; Devarajan B
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Jun; 20(1):342. PubMed ID: 31208315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing the performance of selected variant callers using synthetic data and genome segmentation.
    Bian X; Zhu B; Wang M; Hu Y; Chen Q; Nguyen C; Hicks B; Meerzaman D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Nov; 19(1):429. PubMed ID: 30453880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Systematic benchmark of state-of-the-art variant calling pipelines identifies major factors affecting accuracy of coding sequence variant discovery.
    Barbitoff YA; Abasov R; Tvorogova VE; Glotov AS; Predeus AV
    BMC Genomics; 2022 Feb; 23(1):155. PubMed ID: 35193511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detailed simulation of cancer exome sequencing data reveals differences and common limitations of variant callers.
    Hofmann AL; Behr J; Singer J; Kuipers J; Beisel C; Schraml P; Moch H; Beerenwinkel N
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):8. PubMed ID: 28049408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Comparison of Variant Calling Pipelines Using Genome in a Bottle as a Reference.
    Cornish A; Guda C
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():456479. PubMed ID: 26539496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliably Detecting Clinically Important Variants Requires Both Combined Variant Calls and Optimized Filtering Strategies.
    Field MA; Cho V; Andrews TD; Goodnow CC
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0143199. PubMed ID: 26600436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of somatic variant detection algorithms using Ion Torrent targeted deep sequencing data.
    Wang Q; Kotoula V; Hsu PC; Papadopoulou K; Ho JWK; Fountzilas G; Giannoulatou E
    BMC Med Genomics; 2019 Dec; 12(Suppl 9):181. PubMed ID: 31874647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intersect-then-combine approach: improving the performance of somatic variant calling in whole exome sequencing data using multiple aligners and callers.
    Callari M; Sammut SJ; De Mattos-Arruda L; Bruna A; Rueda OM; Chin SF; Caldas C
    Genome Med; 2017 Apr; 9(1):35. PubMed ID: 28420412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Challenges in exome analysis by LifeScope and its alternative computational pipelines.
    Pranckevičiene E; Rančelis T; Pranculis A; Kučinskas V
    BMC Res Notes; 2015 Sep; 8():421. PubMed ID: 26346699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing variant calling algorithms for target-exon sequencing in a large sample.
    Lo Y; Kang HM; Nelson MR; Othman MI; Chissoe SL; Ehm MG; Abecasis GR; Zöllner S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Mar; 16():75. PubMed ID: 25884587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Misannotated Multi-Nucleotide Variants in Public Cancer Genomics Datasets Lead to Inaccurate Mutation Calls with Significant Implications.
    Srinivasan S; Kalinava N; Aldana R; Li Z; van Hagen S; Rodenburg SYA; Wind-Rotolo M; Qian X; Sasson AS; Tang H; Kirov S
    Cancer Res; 2021 Jan; 81(2):282-288. PubMed ID: 33115802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. BAYSIC: a Bayesian method for combining sets of genome variants with improved specificity and sensitivity.
    Cantarel BL; Weaver D; McNeill N; Zhang J; Mackey AJ; Reese J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Apr; 15():104. PubMed ID: 24725768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing somatic mutation-callers: beyond Venn diagrams.
    Kim SY; Speed TP
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Jun; 14():189. PubMed ID: 23758877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Consensus Genotyper for Exome Sequencing (CGES): improving the quality of exome variant genotypes.
    Trubetskoy V; Rodriguez A; Dave U; Campbell N; Crawford EL; Cook EH; Sutcliffe JS; Foster I; Madduri R; Cox NJ; Davis LK
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Jan; 31(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 25270638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.