These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37231120)

  • 41. The influence of improper sets of information on judgment: how irrelevant information can bias judged probability.
    Dougherty MR; Sprenger A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 May; 135(2):262-81. PubMed ID: 16719653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Outcome effects, moral luck and the hindsight bias.
    Kneer M; Skoczeń I
    Cognition; 2023 Mar; 232():105258. PubMed ID: 36516666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Small class sizes for improving student achievement in primary and secondary schools: a systematic review.
    Filges T; Sonne-Schmidt CS; Nielsen BCV
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2018; 14(1):1-107. PubMed ID: 37131395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Cognitive and implicit biases in nurses' judgment and decision-making: A scoping review.
    Thirsk LM; Panchuk JT; Stahlke S; Hagtvedt R
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2022 Sep; 133():104284. PubMed ID: 35696809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Illusion of control: the role of personal involvement.
    Yarritu I; Matute H; Vadillo MA
    Exp Psychol; 2014 Jan; 61(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 23948387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Natural sample spaces and uncertain belief.
    Gavanski I; Hui C
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1992 Nov; 63(5):766-80. PubMed ID: 1447692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Value-induced bias in medical decision making.
    Levy AG; Hershey JC
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(2):269-76. PubMed ID: 18349431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Surprisingly rational: probability theory plus noise explains biases in judgment.
    Costello F; Watts P
    Psychol Rev; 2014 Jul; 121(3):463-80. PubMed ID: 25090427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The confident conservative: Ideological differences in judgment and decision-making confidence.
    Ruisch BC; Stern C
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Mar; 150(3):527-544. PubMed ID: 32790460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Exemplars in the mist: the cognitive substrate of the representativeness heuristic.
    Nilsson H; Juslin P; Olsson H
    Scand J Psychol; 2008 Jun; 49(3):201-12. PubMed ID: 18419587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Why quantum probability does not explain the conjunction fallacy.
    Tentori K; Crupi V
    Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):308-10. PubMed ID: 23673055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Instrumental judgment and performance under variations in action-outcome contingency and contiguity.
    Shanks DR; Dickinson A
    Mem Cognit; 1991 Jul; 19(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 1895945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Bright mind, moral mind? Intelligence is unrelated to consequentialist moral judgment in sacrificial moral dilemmas.
    Bostyn DH; De Keersmaecker J; Van Assche J; Roets A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Apr; 27(2):392-397. PubMed ID: 31898259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Debiasing Health-Related Judgments and Decision Making: A Systematic Review.
    Ludolph R; Schulz PJ
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Jan; 38(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 28649904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Commentary: Extensional Versus Intuitive Reasoning: The Conjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgment.
    Lewinski P
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1832. PubMed ID: 26635712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Medial prefrontal cortex plays a critical and selective role in 'feeling of knowing' meta-memory judgments.
    Modirrousta M; Fellows LK
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Oct; 46(12):2958-65. PubMed ID: 18606176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A meta-analysis of confidence and judgment accuracy in clinical decision making.
    Miller DJ; Spengler ES; Spengler PM
    J Couns Psychol; 2015 Oct; 62(4):553-67. PubMed ID: 26280710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Cognitive models of physicians' legal standard and personal judgments of competency in patients with Alzheimer's disease.
    Earnst KS; Marson DC; Harrell LE
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2000 Aug; 48(8):919-27. PubMed ID: 10968295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A critical meta-analysis of lens model studies in human judgment and decision-making.
    Kaufmann E; Reips UD; Wittmann WW
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e83528. PubMed ID: 24391781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion on different behaviors: one- and two-handed grasping; one- and two-handed manual estimation; metric and comparative judgment.
    Vishton PM; Fabre E
    Spat Vis; 2003; 16(3-4):377-92. PubMed ID: 12858958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.