161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37233322)
21. Comparison of Diagnostic Mammography-Guided Biopsy and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-Guided Biopsy of Suspicious Breast Calcifications: Results in 1354 Biopsies.
Nguyen DL; Boron A; Oluyemi ET; Myers KS; Mullen LA; Ambinder EB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Feb; 220(2):212-223. PubMed ID: 36102725
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Management of Architectural Distortion on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis With Nonmalignant Pathology at Biopsy.
Villa-Camacho JC; Bahl M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Jul; 219(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 35107312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Architectural distortion on digital breast tomosynthesis mammograms in symptomatic breast clinics: what are the result outcomes?
Bansal GJ; Kale R
Br J Radiol; 2024 Jun; 97(1159):1328-1334. PubMed ID: 38745365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Outcomes of Canceled Tomosynthesis-Guided Biopsy of Architectural Distortion Due to Nonvisualization.
Myers KS; Oluyemi ET; Mullen LA; Panigrahi B; Di Carlo PA; Nguyen DL; Ambinder EB
J Breast Imaging; 2022; 4(4):400-407. PubMed ID: 35915845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Digital breast Tomosynthesis vacuum assisted biopsy for Tomosynthesis-detected Sonographically occult lesions.
Ariaratnam NS; Little ST; Whitley MA; Ferguson K
Clin Imaging; 2018; 47():4-8. PubMed ID: 28806573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Preoperative Tomosynthesis-guided Needle Localization of Mammographically and Sonographically Occult Breast Lesions.
Freer PE; Niell B; Rafferty EA
Radiology; 2015 May; 275(2):377-83. PubMed ID: 25575115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of Upright Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-guided versus Prone Stereotactic Vacuum-assisted Breast Biopsy.
Bahl M; Maunglay M; D'Alessandro HA; Lehman CD
Radiology; 2019 Feb; 290(2):298-304. PubMed ID: 30511909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Pathology results of architectural distortion on detected with digital breast tomosynthesis without definite sonographic correlate.
Walcott-Sapp S; Garreau J; Johnson N; Thomas KA
Am J Surg; 2019 May; 217(5):857-861. PubMed ID: 30777292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Rate of radial scars by core biopsy and upgrading to malignancy or high-risk lesions before and after introduction of digital breast tomosynthesis.
Phantana-Angkool A; Forster MR; Warren YE; Livasy CA; Sobel AH; Beasley LM; Trufan SJ; Hadzikadic-Gusic L; Sarantou T; Voci AE; Sarma D; White RL
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Jan; 173(1):23-29. PubMed ID: 30242581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Diagnostic Evaluation of Recalled Noncalcified Lesions Using Ultrasound Alone Versus Ultrasound Plus Additional Mammographic Views: A Prospective Study.
Porembka JH; Seiler SJ; Sharifi A; Mootz AR; Knippa E; Evans WP; Chen H; Xi Y; Dogan BE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Jun; 218(6):977-987. PubMed ID: 34910533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Tomosynthesis-detected Architectural Distortion: Management Algorithm with Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation.
Durand MA; Wang S; Hooley RJ; Raghu M; Philpotts LE
Radiographics; 2016; 36(2):311-21. PubMed ID: 26963448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Imaging Follow-up Versus Surgical Excision for Radial Scars Identified on Tomosynthesis-Guided Core Needle Biopsy.
Martaindale S; Omofoye TS; Teichgraeber DC; Hess KR; Whitman GJ
Acad Radiol; 2020 Mar; 27(3):389-394. PubMed ID: 31311772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Architectural Distortion on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Management Algorithm and Pathological Outcome.
Samreen N; Moy L; Lee CS
J Breast Imaging; 2020 Sep; 2(5):424-435. PubMed ID: 38424901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the detection of architectural distortion.
Dibble EH; Lourenco AP; Baird GL; Ward RC; Maynard AS; Mainiero MB
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jan; 28(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 28710582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Not all false positive diagnoses are equal: On the prognostic implications of false-positive diagnoses made in breast MRI versus in mammography / digital tomosynthesis screening.
Kuhl CK; Keulers A; Strobel K; Schneider H; Gaisa N; Schrading S
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Feb; 20(1):13. PubMed ID: 29426360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): initial experience in a clinical setting.
Skaane P; Gullien R; Bjørndal H; Eben EB; Ekseth U; Haakenaasen U; Jahr G; Jebsen IN; Krager M
Acta Radiol; 2012 Jun; 53(5):524-9. PubMed ID: 22593120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Guiding vacuum-assisted biopsy in prone position: digital breast tomosynthesis vs stereotactic.
Scaperrotta GP; Boffelli G; Depretto C; Di Leo G; Liguori A; Monaco CG; Borelli A; Ferranti C
Tumori; 2022 Aug; 108(4):326-330. PubMed ID: 34041978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of the clinical and pathological characteristics of ultrasound-guided biopsy for breast masses and non-mass lesions between 16-gauge spring-loaded core needle biopsy and 12-gauge spring-loaded vacuum-assisted biopsy.
Yashima Y; Fujioka T; Kubota K; Mori M; Sato A; Oda G; Nakagawa T; Onishi I; Tanaka M; Tateishi U
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2023 Apr; 50(2):205-212. PubMed ID: 36645627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
