130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37233758)
41. Ultrafast lumbar spine MRI protocol using deep learning-based reconstruction: diagnostic equivalence to a conventional protocol.
Fujiwara M; Kashiwagi N; Matsuo C; Watanabe H; Kassai Y; Nakamoto A; Tomiyama N
Skeletal Radiol; 2023 Feb; 52(2):233-241. PubMed ID: 36181535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Reduction in Acquisition Time and Improvement in Image Quality in T2-Weighted MR Imaging of Musculoskeletal Tumors of the Extremities Using a Novel Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction Technique in a Turbo Spin Echo (TSE) Sequence.
Wessling D; Herrmann J; Afat S; Nickel D; Othman AE; Almansour H; Gassenmaier S
Tomography; 2022 Jul; 8(4):1759-1769. PubMed ID: 35894013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Predicting the risk and severity of acute spinal cord injury after a minor trauma to the cervical spine.
Aebli N; Rüegg TB; Wicki AG; Petrou N; Krebs J
Spine J; 2013 Jun; 13(6):597-604. PubMed ID: 23523437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Cerebrospinal fluid flow artifact reduction with deep learning to optimize the evaluation of spinal canal stenosis on spine MRI.
Kim UH; Kim HJ; Seo J; Chai JW; Oh J; Choi YH; Kim DH
Skeletal Radiol; 2024 May; 53(5):957-965. PubMed ID: 37996559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Imaging of Herniated Discs of the Cervical Spine: Inter-Modality Differences between 64-Slice Multidetector CT and 1.5-T MRI.
Yi JS; Cha JG; Han JK; Kim HJ
Korean J Radiol; 2015; 16(4):881-8. PubMed ID: 26175589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Comparison of noncontrast computed tomography and high-field magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of Great Danes with cervical spondylomyelopathy.
Martin-Vaquero P; da Costa RC; Drost WT
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2014; 55(5):496-505. PubMed ID: 24547789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Parallel imaging of the cervical spine at 3T: optimized trade-off between speed and image quality.
Fruehwald-Pallamar J; Szomolanyi P; Fakhrai N; Lunzer A; Weber M; Thurnher MM; Pallamar M; Trattnig S; Prayer D; Noebauer-Huhmann IM
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2012 Nov; 33(10):1867-74. PubMed ID: 22555578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Compressed Sensing for Breast MRI: Resolving the Trade-Off Between Spatial and Temporal Resolution.
Vreemann S; Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Nickel D; Heacock L; Appelman L; van Zelst J; Karssemeijer N; Weiland E; Maas M; Moy L; Kiefer B; Mann RM
Invest Radiol; 2017 Oct; 52(10):574-582. PubMed ID: 28463932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Assessment of deep learning-based reconstruction on T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted prostate MRI image quality.
Lee KL; Kessler DA; Dezonie S; Chishaya W; Shepherd C; Carmo B; Graves MJ; Barrett T
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Sep; 166():111017. PubMed ID: 37541181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Oblique Sagittal Images Prevent Underestimation of the Neuroforaminal Stenosis Grade Caused by Disc Herniation in Cervical Spine MRI.
Kintzelé L; Rehnitz C; Kauczor HU; Weber MA
Rofo; 2018 Oct; 190(10):946-954. PubMed ID: 29874691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Diagnostic Quality of 3D T2-SPACE Compared with T2-FSE in the Evaluation of Cervical Spine MRI Anatomy.
Chokshi FH; Sadigh G; Carpenter W; Allen JW
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2017 Apr; 38(4):846-850. PubMed ID: 28154126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. MRI of the lumbar spine: comparison of 3D isotropic turbo spin-echo SPACE sequence versus conventional 2D sequences at 3.0 T.
Lee S; Jee WH; Jung JY; Lee SY; Ryu KS; Ha KY
Acta Radiol; 2015 Feb; 56(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 24553584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Comparison of computed tomography myelography and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy.
Shafaie FF; Wippold FJ; Gado M; Pilgram TK; Riew KD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Sep; 24(17):1781-5. PubMed ID: 10488507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Three-dimensional isotropic T2-weighted cervical MRI at 3T: comparison with two-dimensional T2-weighted sequences.
Kwon JW; Yoon YC; Choi SH
Clin Radiol; 2012 Feb; 67(2):106-13. PubMed ID: 22142499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Evaluation of diagnostic value and T2-weighted three-dimensional isotropic turbo spin-echo (3D-SPACE) image quality in comparison with T2-weighted two-dimensional turbo spin-echo (2D-TSE) sequences in lumbar spine MR imaging.
Hossein J; Fariborz F; Mehrnaz R; Babak R
Eur J Radiol Open; 2019; 6():36-41. PubMed ID: 30619918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Deep learning-accelerated T2-weighted imaging of the prostate: Impact of further acceleration with lower spatial resolution on image quality.
Kim EH; Choi MH; Lee YJ; Han D; Mostapha M; Nickel D
Eur J Radiol; 2021 Dec; 145():110012. PubMed ID: 34753082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Time for change? Radiologists highly concordant assessing change in stenoses on follow-up cervical spine MRI.
Costello JE; Shah LM; Peckham ME; Stilwill SE; Safazadeh G; Hutchins TA
Neuroradiol J; 2023 Oct; 36(5):588-592. PubMed ID: 37042077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. High Acceleration Three-Dimensional T1-Weighted Dual Echo Dixon Hepatobiliary Phase Imaging Using Compressed Sensing-Sensitivity Encoding: Comparison of Image Quality and Solid Lesion Detectability with the Standard T1-Weighted Sequence.
Nam JG; Lee JM; Lee SM; Kang HJ; Lee ES; Hur BY; Yoon JH; Kim E; Doneva M
Korean J Radiol; 2019 Mar; 20(3):438-448. PubMed ID: 30799575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine: comparison of 2D T2-weighted turbo spin echo, 2D T2*weighted gradient-recalled echo and 3D T2-weighted variable flip-angle turbo spin echo sequences.
Meindl T; Wirth S; Weckbach S; Dietrich O; Reiser M; Schoenberg SO
Eur Radiol; 2009 Mar; 19(3):713-21. PubMed ID: 18813933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Inter-observer reliability and clinical validity of the MRI grading system for cervical central stenosis based on sagittal T2-weighted image.
Lee KH; Park HJ; Lee SY; Kim MS; Lee YT; Kim YB; Kim JN; Youn I
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Jun; 127():108987. PubMed ID: 32298959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
