These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3723442)

  • 21. Notional number agreement in English.
    Humphreys KR; Bock K
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Aug; 12(4):689-95. PubMed ID: 16447383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading.
    Hoeks JC; Stowe LA; Doedens G
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Mar; 19(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 14972359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Combined effects of form- and meaning-based predictability on perceived clarity of speech.
    Signoret C; Johnsrude I; Classon E; Rudner M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Feb; 44(2):277-285. PubMed ID: 28557490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Head start for target language in bilingual listening.
    Fitzpatrick I; Indefrey P
    Brain Res; 2014 Jan; 1542():111-30. PubMed ID: 24144675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effects of thematic context and presentation mode on memory for sentence voice.
    Kerr NH; Butler SF; Maykuth PL; Delis D
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1982 May; 11(3):247-64. PubMed ID: 7143278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Syntactic ambiguity resolution in discourse: modeling the effects of referential context and lexical frequency.
    Spivey MJ; Tanenhaus MK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Nov; 24(6):1521-43. PubMed ID: 9835064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Global context effects on processing lexically ambiguous words: evidence from eye fixations.
    Kambe G; Rayner K; Duffy SA
    Mem Cognit; 2001 Mar; 29(2):363-72. PubMed ID: 11352220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Remindings influence the interpretation of ambiguous stimuli.
    Tullis JG; Braverman M; Ross BH; Benjamin AS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Feb; 21(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 23835617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Influence of contextual features on the activation of ambiguous word meanings.
    Paul ST; Kellas G; Martin M; Clark MB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Jul; 18(4):703-17. PubMed ID: 1385611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dichotic listening indices of right hemisphere semantic processing.
    Ely PW; Graves RE; Potter SM
    Neuropsychologia; 1989; 27(7):1007-15. PubMed ID: 2771025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Understanding ambiguous words in sentence contexts: electrophysiological evidence for delayed contextual selection in Broca's aphasia.
    Swaab TY; Brown C; Hagoort P
    Neuropsychologia; 1998 Aug; 36(8):737-61. PubMed ID: 9751439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Learning about the meanings of ambiguous words: evidence from a word-meaning priming paradigm with short narratives.
    Blott LM; Hartopp O; Nation K; Rodd JM
    PeerJ; 2022; 10():e14070. PubMed ID: 36281360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Impact of Age, Background Noise, Semantic Ambiguity, and Hearing Loss on Recognition Memory for Spoken Sentences.
    Koeritzer MA; Rogers CS; Van Engen KJ; Peelle JE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 61(3):740-751. PubMed ID: 29450493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Decoding embedded sentences and dichotic ear advantage.
    Huang MS
    J Psychol; 1983 Jan; 113(1st Half):101-11. PubMed ID: 6834282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Idiomatic versus literal interpretations of ditropically ambiguous sentences.
    Van Lancker D; Canter GJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1981 Mar; 24(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 7253631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Suppressing irrelevant information: knowledge activation or inhibition?
    McNamara DS; McDaniel MA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):465-82. PubMed ID: 14979818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Event-related potential indices of ambiguous sentence processing.
    Erwin RJ
    Brain Lang; 1986 Mar; 27(2):224-38. PubMed ID: 3955340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of dichotic/diotic versus monotic presentation on speech understanding in noise in elderly hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kaplan H; Pickett JM
    Ear Hear; 1981; 2(5):202-7. PubMed ID: 7297784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fill the gap! Combining pragmatic and prosodic information to make gapping easy.
    Hoeks JC; Redeker G; Hendriks P
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2009 Jun; 38(3):221-35. PubMed ID: 19347585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sentence context and lexical ambiguity resolution by the two hemispheres.
    Faust M; Chiarello C
    Neuropsychologia; 1998 Sep; 36(9):827-35. PubMed ID: 9740356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.