180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37234988)
1. The prognostic value of
Zheng A; Wang Z; Luo L; Chang R; Gao J; Wang B; Duan X
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1169189. PubMed ID: 37234988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can
Yin H; Chen M; Qiu X; Qiu L; Gao J; Li D; Fu Y; Huang H; Guo S; Zhang Q; Ai S; Wang F; Guo H
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Oct; 48(11):3693-3701. PubMed ID: 33813594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of PSMA PET/CT to predict upgrading in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for ISUP grade group 1 prostate cancer.
Esen B; Seymen H; Gurses B; Armutlu A; Koseoglu E; Tarim K; Ertoy Baydar D; Sarikaya AF; Canda AE; Balbay D; Kordan Y; Tilki D; Esen T; Demirkol MO
Prostate; 2024 Jan; 84(1):32-38. PubMed ID: 37661579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Which Patients with Prostate Cancer and Lymph Node Uptake at Preoperative Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography Scan Are at a Higher Risk of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy? Identifying Indicators of Systemic Disease by Integrating Clinical, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Functional Imaging Parameters.
Mazzone E; Gandaglia G; Robesti D; Rajwa P; Gomez Rivas J; Ibáñez L; Soeterik TFW; Bianchi L; Afferi L; Kesch C; Darr C; Guo H; Zhuang J; Zattoni F; Fendler WP; Amparore D; Huebner NA; Giesen A; Joniau S; Schiavina R; Brunocilla E; Mattei A; Dal Moro F; Moreno Sierra J; Porpiglia F; Picchio M; Chiti A; van den Bergh R; Shariat SF; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2024 Apr; 7(2):231-240. PubMed ID: 37689506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A nomogram for accurately predicting the pathological upgrading of prostate cancer, based on
Hu Q; Hong X; Xu L; Jia R
Prostate; 2022 Aug; 82(11):1077-1087. PubMed ID: 35468221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinicopathological factors associated with pathological upgrading from biopsy to prostatectomy in patients with ISUP grade group ≤2 prostate cancer.
Li X; Wang ZX; Zhu YP; Wang J; Yin YS; Zeng XY
Asian J Androl; 2022; 24(5):487-493. PubMed ID: 35170453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic value of integrated
Zeng Y; Leng X; Liao H; Jiang G; Chen P
Prostate Int; 2022 Jun; 10(2):108-116. PubMed ID: 35510079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Role of prostate health index to predict Gleason score upgrading and high-risk prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Kim H; Jung G; Kim JH; Byun SS; Hong SK
Sci Rep; 2021 Aug; 11(1):17447. PubMed ID: 34465825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Histological comparison between predictive value of preoperative 3-T multiparametric MRI and
Franklin A; Yaxley WJ; Raveenthiran S; Coughlin G; Gianduzzo T; Kua B; McEwan L; Wong D; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Samaratunga H; Brown N; Parkinson R; Roberts MJ; Yaxley JW
BJU Int; 2021 Jan; 127(1):71-79. PubMed ID: 32524748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic accuracy of
Scheltema MJ; Chang JI; Stricker PD; van Leeuwen PJ; Nguyen QA; Ho B; Delprado W; Lee J; Thompson JE; Cusick T; Spriensma AS; Siriwardana AR; Yuen C; Kooner R; Hruby G; O'Neill G; Emmett L
BJU Int; 2019 Nov; 124 Suppl 1():42-49. PubMed ID: 31287613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Immunohistochemical and histopathological validation of
Heetman JG; Hermsen R; Exterkate L; Küsters-Vandevelde HVN; Brouwer LJM; Somford DM; van den Bergh RCN; van Basten JA
Prostate; 2023 Oct; 83(14):1332-1341. PubMed ID: 37455399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pathological findings at radical prostatectomy of biopsy naïve men diagnosed with MRI targeted biopsy alone without concomitant standard systematic sampling.
Luzzago S; Petralia G; Maresca D; Sabatini I; Cordima G; Brescia A; Verweij F; Garelli G; Mistretta FA; Cioffi A; Pricolo P; Alessi S; Ferro M; Matei DV; Renne G; de Cobelli O; Musi G
Urol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 38(12):929.e11-929.e19. PubMed ID: 32600928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic value of
Niu XB; Li YP; Wang J; Mei XL; Zhao XY; Liu TT; Xu SS; Han XM; Cheng JL
Cancer Biol Ther; 2024 Dec; 25(1):2287120. PubMed ID: 38117551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combined multiple clinical characteristics for prediction of discordance in grade and stage in prostate cancer patients undergoing systematic biopsy and radical prostatectomy.
Liu H; Tang K; Xia D; Peng E; Wang L; Chen Z
Pathol Res Pract; 2020 Nov; 216(11):153235. PubMed ID: 33035728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pathological predictors of
Perry E; Talwar A; Taubman K; Ng M; Wong LM; Sutherland TR
BJU Int; 2022 Jun; 130 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):28-36. PubMed ID: 35768883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Prospective Comparison of
Anttinen M; Ettala O; Malaspina S; Jambor I; Sandell M; Kajander S; Rinta-Kiikka I; Schildt J; Saukko E; Rautio P; Timonen KL; Matikainen T; Noponen T; Saunavaara J; Löyttyniemi E; Taimen P; Kemppainen J; Dean PB; Blanco Sequeiros R; Aronen HJ; Seppänen M; Boström PJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 4(4):635-644. PubMed ID: 32675047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Deep learning based on 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for predicting pathological upgrading in patients with prostate cancer.
Zang S; Jiang C; Zhang L; Fu J; Meng Q; Wu W; Shao G; Sun H; Jia R; Wang F
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1273414. PubMed ID: 38260839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical parameters and nomograms for predicting lymph node metastasis detected with
Onal C; Ozyigit G; Oymak E; Guler OC; Hurmuz P; Tilki B; Reyhan M; Tuncel M; Akyol F
Prostate; 2021 Jul; 81(10):648-656. PubMed ID: 33949694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
Klingenberg S; Jochumsen MR; Ulhøi BP; Fredsøe J; Sørensen KD; Borre M; Bouchelouche K
J Nucl Med; 2021 Feb; 62(2):214-220. PubMed ID: 32444374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
