BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37235799)

  • 1. An Immunologic and Biomechanical Comparison of Polyether Ether Ketone-Zeolite and Polyether Ether Ketone Interbody Fusion Devices.
    Cheng BC; Swink I; McClain EJ; Vyas PS; Muzzonigro T; Carbone J; Zaidi A; Long JD; Altman DT; Yu AK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2023 Aug; 48(16):1174-1180. PubMed ID: 37235799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Early bone ingrowth and segmental stability of a trussed titanium cage versus a polyether ether ketone cage in an ovine lumbar interbody fusion model.
    Loenen ACY; Peters MJM; Bevers RTJ; Schaffrath C; van Haver E; Cuijpers VMJI; Rademakers T; van Rietbergen B; Willems PC; Arts JJ
    Spine J; 2022 Jan; 22(1):174-182. PubMed ID: 34274502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impaction durability of porous polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) and titanium-coated PEEK interbody fusion devices.
    Torstrick FB; Klosterhoff BS; Westerlund LE; Foley KT; Gochuico J; Lee CSD; Gall K; Safranski DL
    Spine J; 2018 May; 18(5):857-865. PubMed ID: 29366985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of Surface Topography and Chemistry on Polyether-Ether-Ketone (PEEK) and Titanium Osseointegration.
    Torstrick FB; Lin ASP; Safranski DL; Potter D; Sulchek T; Lee CSD; Gall K; Guldberg RE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Apr; 45(8):E417-E424. PubMed ID: 31703050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. PEEK Versus Ti Interbody Fusion Devices: Resultant Fusion, Bone Apposition, Initial and 26-Week Biomechanics.
    Pelletier MH; Cordaro N; Punjabi VM; Waites M; Lau A; Walsh WR
    Clin Spine Surg; 2016 May; 29(4):E208-14. PubMed ID: 22801456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) titanium composite interbody spacer in an ovine lumbar interbody fusion model: biomechanical, microcomputed tomographic, and histologic analyses.
    McGilvray KC; Waldorff EI; Easley J; Seim HB; Zhang N; Linovitz RJ; Ryaby JT; Puttlitz CM
    Spine J; 2017 Dec; 17(12):1907-1916. PubMed ID: 28751242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The in vivo response to a novel Ti coating compared with polyether ether ketone: evaluation of the periphery and inner surfaces of an implant.
    Walsh WR; Pelletier MH; Christou C; He J; Vizesi F; Boden SD
    Spine J; 2018 Jul; 18(7):1231-1240. PubMed ID: 29496625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bony ingrowth potential of 3D-printed porous titanium alloy: a direct comparison of interbody cage materials in an in vivo ovine lumbar fusion model.
    McGilvray KC; Easley J; Seim HB; Regan D; Berven SH; Hsu WK; Mroz TE; Puttlitz CM
    Spine J; 2018 Jul; 18(7):1250-1260. PubMed ID: 29496624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 3D-printed titanium cages without bone graft outperform PEEK cages with autograft in an animal model.
    Laratta JL; Vivace BJ; López-Peña M; Guzón FM; Gonzalez-Cantalpeidra A; Jorge-Mora A; Villar-Liste RM; Pino-Lopez L; Lukyanchuk A; Taghizadeh EA; Pino-Minguez J
    Spine J; 2022 Jun; 22(6):1016-1027. PubMed ID: 34906741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does PEEK/HA Enhance Bone Formation Compared With PEEK in a Sheep Cervical Fusion Model?
    Walsh WR; Pelletier MH; Bertollo N; Christou C; Tan C
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2364-2372. PubMed ID: 27549990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Porous titanium-6 aluminum-4 vanadium cage has better osseointegration and less micromotion than a poly-ether-ether-ketone cage in sheep vertebral fusion.
    Wu SH; Li Y; Zhang YQ; Li XK; Yuan CF; Hao YL; Zhang ZY; Guo Z
    Artif Organs; 2013 Dec; 37(12):E191-201. PubMed ID: 24147953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of porous orthopaedic implant material and structure on load sharing with simulated bone ingrowth: A finite element analysis comparing titanium and PEEK.
    Carpenter RD; Klosterhoff BS; Torstrick FB; Foley KT; Burkus JK; Lee CSD; Gall K; Guldberg RE; Safranski DL
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Apr; 80():68-76. PubMed ID: 29414477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An investigational time course study of titanium plasma spray on osseointegration of PEEK and titanium implants: an in vivo ovine model.
    Cunningham BW; Brooks DM; Rolle NP; Weiner DA; Wang W
    Spine J; 2024 Apr; 24(4):721-729. PubMed ID: 37875243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a lumbar intervertebral spacer with integrated screws as a stand-alone fixation device.
    Beaubien BP; Freeman AL; Turner JL; Castro CA; Armstrong WD; Waugh LG; Dryer RF
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Jul; 23(5):351-8. PubMed ID: 20084028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of 3D-printed titanium-alloy, standard titanium-alloy, and PEEK interbody spacers in an ovine model.
    Van Horn MR; Beard R; Wang W; Cunningham BW; Mullinix KP; Allall M; Bucklen BS
    Spine J; 2021 Dec; 21(12):2097-2103. PubMed ID: 34029756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical evaluation of stand-alone lumbar polyether-ether-ketone interbody cage with integrated screws.
    Kornblum MB; Turner AW; Cornwall GB; Zatushevsky MA; Phillips FM
    Spine J; 2013 Jan; 13(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 23295035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can Polyether Ether Ketone Dethrone Titanium as the Choice Implant Material for Metastatic Spine Tumor Surgery?
    Kumar N; Ramakrishnan SA; Lopez KG; Madhu S; Ramos MRD; Fuh JYH; Hallinan J; Nolan CP; Benneker LM; Vellayappan BA
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Apr; 148():94-109. PubMed ID: 33508491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enhancement of surface bioactivity on carbon fiber-reinforced polyether ether ketone via graphene modification.
    Yan JH; Wang CH; Li KW; Zhang Q; Yang M; Di-Wu WL; Yan M; Song Y; Ba JJ; Bi L; Han YS
    Int J Nanomedicine; 2018; 13():3425-3440. PubMed ID: 29942128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MIS Expandable Interbody Spacers: A Literature Review and Biomechanical Comparison of an Expandable MIS TLIF With Conventional TLIF and ALIF.
    Cannestra AF; Peterson MD; Parker SR; Roush TF; Bundy JV; Turner AW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Apr; 41 Suppl 8():S44-9. PubMed ID: 26825792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial comparing PEEK and allograft spacers in patients undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgeries.
    Villavicencio AT; Nelson EL; Rajpal S; Beasley K; Burneikiene S
    Spine J; 2022 Jan; 22(1):84-94. PubMed ID: 34116214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.