153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37235799)
21. Undercut macrostructure topography on and within an interbody cage improves biomechanical stability and interbody fusion.
Walsh WR; Pelletier M; Wills D; Wang T; Bannigan S; Vizesi F
Spine J; 2020 Nov; 20(11):1876-1886. PubMed ID: 32645503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Biomechanical Effects of an Oblique Lumbar PEEK Cage and Posterior Augmentation.
Soriano-Baron H; Newcomb AGUS; Malhotra D; Martinez Del Campo E; Palma AE; Theodore N; Crawford NR; Kelly BP; Kaibara T
World Neurosurg; 2019 Jun; 126():e975-e981. PubMed ID: 30876999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A study to compare the efficacy of polyether ether ketone rod device with titanium devices in posterior spinal fusion in a canine model.
Wang N; Xie H; Xi C; Zhang H; Yan J
J Orthop Surg Res; 2017 Mar; 12(1):40. PubMed ID: 28279204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Host bone response to polyetheretherketone versus porous tantalum implants for cervical spinal fusion in a goat model.
Sinclair SK; Konz GJ; Dawson JM; Epperson RT; Bloebaum RD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 May; 37(10):E571-80. PubMed ID: 22146277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. PEEK-Halo effect in interbody fusion.
Phan K; Hogan JA; Assem Y; Mobbs RJ
J Clin Neurosci; 2016 Feb; 24():138-40. PubMed ID: 26474500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prospective, Randomized, Blinded Clinical Trial Comparing PEEK and Allograft Spacers in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgeries.
Villavicencio AT; Nelson EL; Rajpal S; Beasley K; Burneikiene S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2022 Aug; 47(15):1043-1054. PubMed ID: 35881014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel S-Type, Dynamic Zero-Profile Cage Design for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Variations in Bone Graft Shape: A Finite Element Analysis.
Manickam PS; Roy S; Shetty GM
World Neurosurg; 2021 Oct; 154():e199-e214. PubMed ID: 34246827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Application of a stand-alone interbody fusion cage based on a novel porous TiO2/glass ceramic--2: Biomechanical evaluation after implantation in the sheep cervical spine].
Korinth MC; Hero T; Pandorf T; Zell D
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2005 Apr; 50(4):111-8. PubMed ID: 15884708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Experimental fusion of the sheep cervical spine. Part II: Effect of growth factors and carrier systems on interbody fusion].
Kandziora F; Scholz M; Pflugmacher R; Krummrey G; Schollmeier G; Schmidmaier G; Schnake KJ; Duda G; Raschke M; Haas NP
Chirurg; 2002 Oct; 73(10):1025-38. PubMed ID: 12395162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Bioabsorbable interbody cages in a sheep cervical spine fusion model.
Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Scholz M; Eindorf T; Schnake KJ; Haas NP
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Sep; 29(17):1845-55; discussion 1856. PubMed ID: 15534403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using nonresorbable poly-ether-ether-ketone versus resorbable poly-L-lactide-co-D,L-lactide fusion devices: a prospective, randomized study to assess fusion and clinical outcome.
Jiya T; Smit T; Deddens J; Mullender M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Feb; 34(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 19179917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Getting PEEK to Stick to Bone: The Development of Porous PEEK for Interbody Fusion Devices.
Torstrick FB; Safranski DL; Burkus JK; Chappuis JL; Lee CSD; Guldberg RE; Gall K; Smith KE
Tech Orthop; 2017 Sep; 32(3):158-166. PubMed ID: 29225416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluating Osseointegration Into a Deeply Porous Titanium Scaffold: A Biomechanical Comparison With PEEK and Allograft.
Guyer RD; Abitbol JJ; Ohnmeiss DD; Yao C
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Oct; 41(19):E1146-E1150. PubMed ID: 27135643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Polyetheretherketone as a biomaterial for spinal applications.
Toth JM; Wang M; Estes BT; Scifert JL; Seim HB; Turner AS
Biomaterials; 2006 Jan; 27(3):324-34. PubMed ID: 16115677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Histologic evaluation of the efficacy of rhBMP-2 compared with autograft bone in sheep spinal anterior interbody fusion.
Sandhu HS; Toth JM; Diwan AD; Seim HB; Kanim LE; Kabo JM; Turner AS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Mar; 27(6):567-75. PubMed ID: 11884903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Biomechanical, histological, and computed X-ray tomographic analyses of hydroxyapatite coated PEEK implants in an extended healing model in rabbit.
Johansson P; Barkarmo S; Hawthan M; Peruzzi N; Kjellin P; Wennerberg A
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2018 May; 106(5):1440-1447. PubMed ID: 29341426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Bioresorbable polylactide interbody implants in an ovine anterior cervical discectomy and fusion model: three-year results.
Thomas KA; Toth JM; Crawford NR; Seim HB; Shi LL; Harris MB; Turner AS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Apr; 33(7):734-42. PubMed ID: 18379399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Osteoblasts exhibit a more differentiated phenotype and increased bone morphogenetic protein production on titanium alloy substrates than on poly-ether-ether-ketone.
Olivares-Navarrete R; Gittens RA; Schneider JM; Hyzy SL; Haithcock DA; Ullrich PF; Schwartz Z; Boyan BD
Spine J; 2012 Mar; 12(3):265-72. PubMed ID: 22424980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessment of BioPlex interbody fusion device in a sheep lumbar fusion model.
Fredericks DC; Gandhi AA; Grosland NM; Smucker JD
Iowa Orthop J; 2013; 33():33-9. PubMed ID: 24027458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Ultrasound-triggered antibiotic release from PEEK clips to prevent spinal fusion infection: Initial evaluations.
Delaney LJ; MacDonald D; Leung J; Fitzgerald K; Sevit AM; Eisenbrey JR; Patel N; Forsberg F; Kepler CK; Fang T; Kurtz SM; Hickok NJ
Acta Biomater; 2019 Jul; 93():12-24. PubMed ID: 30826477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
