These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37235812)

  • 21. Determining the quality and effectiveness of surgical spine care: patient satisfaction is not a valid proxy.
    Godil SS; Parker SL; Zuckerman SL; Mendenhall SK; Devin CJ; Asher AL; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2013 Sep; 13(9):1006-12. PubMed ID: 23685216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Defining substantial clinical benefit following lumbar spine arthrodesis.
    Glassman SD; Copay AG; Berven SH; Polly DW; Subach BR; Carreon LY
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Sep; 90(9):1839-47. PubMed ID: 18762642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE
    World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Patient-reported outcomes following surgery for degenerative spondylolitshtesis: comparison of a universal and multitier health care system.
    Ailon T; Tee J; Manson N; Hall H; Thomas K; Rampersaud YR; Yee A; Dea N; Glennie A; Bailey C; Christie S; Weber MH; Nataraj A; Paquet J; Johnson M; Norton J; Ahn H; McIntosh G; Fisher CG
    Spine J; 2019 Jan; 19(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 30312774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Do Lumbar Decompression and Fusion Patients Recall Their Preoperative Status?: A Cohort Study of Recall Bias in Patient-Reported Outcomes.
    Aleem IS; Duncan J; Ahmed AM; Zarrabian M; Eck J; Rhee J; Clarke M; Currier BL; Nassr A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Jan; 42(2):128-134. PubMed ID: 27163372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Determining minimal clinically important difference estimates following surgery for degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine: analysis of the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) registry.
    Power JD; Perruccio AV; Canizares M; McIntosh G; Abraham E; Attabib N; Bailey CS; Charest-Morin R; Dea N; Finkelstein J; Fisher C; Glennie RA; Hall H; Johnson MG; Kelly AM; Kingwell S; Manson N; Nataraj A; Paquet J; Singh S; Soroceanu A; Thomas KC; Weber MH; Rampersaud YR
    Spine J; 2023 Sep; 23(9):1323-1333. PubMed ID: 37160168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Practical answers to frequently asked questions in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery.
    Shahi P; Vaishnav AS; Mai E; Kim JH; Dalal S; Song J; Shinn DJ; Melissaridou D; Araghi K; Urakawa H; Sivaganesan A; Lafage V; Qureshi SA; Iyer S
    Spine J; 2023 Jan; 23(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 35843537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Stability-preserving decompression in degenerative versus congenital spinal stenosis: demographic patterns and patient outcomes.
    Louie PK; Paul JC; Markowitz J; Bell JA; Basques BA; Yacob A; An HS
    Spine J; 2017 Oct; 17(10):1420-1425. PubMed ID: 28456675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Validating the predictive precision of the dialogue support tool on Danish patient cohorts.
    Pedersen CF; Andersen MØ; Carreon LY; Eiskjær S
    N Am Spine Soc J; 2023 Mar; 13():100188. PubMed ID: 36579158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Do measures of surgical effectiveness at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery accurately predict 2-year outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Elsamadicy AA; Han JL; Cheng J; Karikari I; Bagley CA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):689-696. PubMed ID: 26722957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database, Part 1. Disability, quality of life, and pain outcomes following lumbar spine surgery: predicting likely individual patient outcomes for shared decision-making.
    McGirt MJ; Bydon M; Archer KR; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Parker SL; Nian H; Harrell FE; Speroff T; Dittus RS; Philips SE; Shaffrey CI; Foley KT; Asher AL
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):357-369. PubMed ID: 28498074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The association between the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey and real-world clinical outcomes in lumbar spine surgery.
    Levin JM; Winkelman RD; Smith GA; Tanenbaum J; Benzel EC; Mroz TE; Steinmetz MP
    Spine J; 2017 Nov; 17(11):1586-1593. PubMed ID: 28495242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Can we define success criteria for lumbar disc surgery? : estimates for a substantial amount of improvement in core outcome measures.
    Solberg T; Johnsen LG; Nygaard ØP; Grotle M
    Acta Orthop; 2013 Apr; 84(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 23506164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: 8 to 10 year results from the maine lumbar spine study.
    Atlas SJ; Keller RB; Wu YA; Deyo RA; Singer DE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Apr; 30(8):936-43. PubMed ID: 15834339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
    Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Kerezoudis P; Glassman S; Foley K; Slotkin JR; Potts E; Shaffrey M; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly J; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk M; Asher AL; Bydon M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E11. PubMed ID: 28760035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Criteria for failure and worsening after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a multicenter observational study based on data from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.
    Werner DAT; Grotle M; Gulati S; Austevoll IM; Lønne G; Nygaard ØP; Solberg TK
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Oct; 26(10):2650-2659. PubMed ID: 28616747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bilateral implantation of low-profile interbody fusion cages: subsidence, lordosis, and fusion analysis.
    Schiffman M; Brau SA; Henderson R; Gimmestad G
    Spine J; 2003; 3(5):377-87. PubMed ID: 14588950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The patient acceptable symptom state for the Oswestry Disability Index following single-level lumbar fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Goh GS; Soh RCC; Yue WM; Guo CM; Tan SB; Chen JL
    Spine J; 2021 Apr; 21(4):598-609. PubMed ID: 33221514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of unintended dural tears on postoperative outcomes in lumbar surgery patients: a multicenter observational study with propensity scoring.
    Nakajima K; Nakamoto H; Kato S; Doi T; Matsubayashi Y; Taniguchi Y; Kawamura N; Higashikawa A; Takeshita Y; Fukushima M; Ono T; Hara N; Azuma S; Tanaka S; Oshima Y
    Spine J; 2020 Dec; 20(12):1968-1975. PubMed ID: 32544720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Determination of the Oswestry Disability Index score equivalent to a "satisfactory symptom state" in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine-a Spine Tango registry-based study.
    van Hooff ML; Mannion AF; Staub LP; Ostelo RW; Fairbank JC
    Spine J; 2016 Oct; 16(10):1221-1230. PubMed ID: 27343730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.