105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37235889)
1. Finding an effective MRI sequence to visualise the electroporated area in plant-based models by quantitative mapping.
Thomas A; Nolte T; Baragona M; Ritter A
Bioelectrochemistry; 2023 Oct; 153():108463. PubMed ID: 37235889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Plant-based model for the visual evaluation of electroporated area after irreversible electroporation and its comparison to in-vivo animal data.
Lindelauf KHK; Thomas A; Baragona M; Jouni A; Nolte T; Pedersoli F; Pfeffer J; Baumann M; Maessen RTH; Ritter A
Sci Prog; 2023; 106(1):368504231156294. PubMed ID: 36803089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Irreversible electroporation in the liver: contrast-enhanced inversion-recovery MR imaging approaches to differentiate reversibly electroporated penumbra from irreversibly electroporated ablation zones.
Guo Y; Zhang Y; Nijm GM; Sahakian AV; Yang GY; Omary RA; Larson AC
Radiology; 2011 Feb; 258(2):461-8. PubMed ID: 21131581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of prostate cancer with magnetic resonance imaging: optimization of T1-weighted, T2-weighted, dynamic-enhanced T1-weighted, diffusion-weighted imaging apparent diffusion coefficient mapping sequences and MR spectroscopy, correlated with biopsy and histopathological findings.
Aydin H; Kizilgöz V; Tatar IG; Damar C; Ugan AR; Paker I; Hekimoğlu B
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(1):30-45. PubMed ID: 22261768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What is the most effective tool for detecting prostate cancer using a standard MR scanner?
Osugi K; Tanimoto A; Nakashima J; Shinoda K; Hashiguchi A; Oya M; Jinzaki M; Kuribayashi S
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2013 Dec; 12(4):271-80. PubMed ID: 24172787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In situ monitoring of electric field distribution in mouse tumor during electroporation.
Kranjc M; Markelc B; Bajd F; Čemažar M; Serša I; Blagus T; Miklavčič D
Radiology; 2015 Jan; 274(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 25144647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The value of relaxation time quantitative technique from synthetic magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and invasion assessment of prostate cancer].
Song N; Wang T; Zhang D; Wang Z; Zhang SR; Yu J; Cai L; Ma AL; Zhang Q; Chen ZQ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Apr; 102(15):1093-1099. PubMed ID: 35436808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of different MRI sequences in lesion detection and early response evaluation of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma--a whole-body MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging study.
Wu X; Nerisho S; Dastidar P; Ryymin P; Järvenpää R; Pertovaara H; Eskola H; Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL
NMR Biomed; 2013 Sep; 26(9):1186-94. PubMed ID: 23483722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of nonthermal irreversible electroporation in vegetable tissue.
Hjouj M; Rubinsky B
J Membr Biol; 2010 Jul; 236(1):137-46. PubMed ID: 20631997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. T2*-weighted MRI as a non-contrast-enhanced method for assessment of focal laser ablation zone extent in prostate cancer thermotherapy.
Sun C; Wang S; Chatterjee A; Medved M; Eggener S; Karczmar GS; Oto A
Eur Radiol; 2021 Jan; 31(1):325-332. PubMed ID: 32785769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Percutaneous ablation therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma with irreversible electroporation: MRI findings.
Granata V; Fusco R; Catalano O; Piccirillo M; De Bellis M; Izzo F; Petrillo A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 May; 204(5):1000-7. PubMed ID: 25905934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Irreversible Electroporation: Defining the MRI Appearance of the Ablation Zone With Histopathologic Correlation in a Porcine Liver Model.
Felker ER; Dregely I; Chung DJ; Sung K; Osuagwu FC; Lassman C; Sayre J; Wu H; Lu DS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 May; 208(5):1141-1146. PubMed ID: 28177652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of electroporation-induced membrane permeabilization states in the brain using diffusion-weighted MRI.
Mahmood F; Hansen RH; Agerholm-Larsen B; Gissel H; Ibsen P; Gehl J
Acta Oncol; 2015 Mar; 54(3):289-97. PubMed ID: 25591820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Comparison of T
McGarry BL; Damion RA; Chew I; Knight MJ; Harston GW; Carone D; Jezzard P; Sitaram A; Muir KW; Clatworthy P; Kauppinen RA
J Cent Nerv Syst Dis; 2020; 12():1179573520943314. PubMed ID: 32963473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MESMERISED: Super-accelerating T
Fritz FJ; Poser BA; Roebroeck A
Neuroimage; 2021 Oct; 239():118285. PubMed ID: 34147632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of hard meningiomas: quantitative evaluation based on the magnetic resonance signal intensity.
Watanabe K; Kakeda S; Yamamoto J; Ide S; Ohnari N; Nishizawa S; Korogi Y
Acta Radiol; 2016 Mar; 57(3):333-40. PubMed ID: 25824207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stimulated echo based mapping (STEM) of T
Zhang Y; Wells SA; Hernando D
Magn Reson Med; 2019 Jan; 81(1):167-181. PubMed ID: 30024051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diffusion-sensitized ophthalmic magnetic resonance imaging free of geometric distortion at 3.0 and 7.0 T: a feasibility study in healthy subjects and patients with intraocular masses.
Paul K; Graessl A; Rieger J; Lysiak D; Huelnhagen T; Winter L; Heidemann R; Lindner T; Hadlich S; Zimpfer A; Pohlmann A; Endemann B; Krüger PC; Langner S; Stachs O; Niendorf T
Invest Radiol; 2015 May; 50(5):309-21. PubMed ID: 25612144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diffusion MR Imaging with T2-based Water Suppression (T2wsup-dMRI).
Kimura T; Yamashita K; Fukatsu K
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2022 Jul; 21(3):499-515. PubMed ID: 34305080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of echo time and T
Uddin MN; Figley TD; Figley CR
Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Sep; 51():35-43. PubMed ID: 29680454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
