These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37236312)
1. Long-Term Changes in Sagittal Balance After Microsurgical Decompression of Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis in Elderly Patients: A Follow-Up Study for 5-Years After Surgery. Yokoyama K; Ikeda N; Tanaka H; Ito Y; Sugie A; Yamada M; Wanibuchi M; Kawanishi M World Neurosurg; 2023 Aug; 176():e384-e390. PubMed ID: 37236312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factors associated with improvement in sagittal spinal alignment after microendoscopic laminotomy in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Dohzono S; Toyoda H; Takahashi S; Matsumoto T; Suzuki A; Terai H; Nakamura H J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jul; 25(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 26967988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiological improvements in global sagittal alignment after lumbar decompression without fusion. Fujii K; Kawamura N; Ikegami M; Niitsuma G; Kunogi J Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 May; 40(10):703-9. PubMed ID: 25394314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spinopelvic sagittal imbalance as a risk factor for adjacent-segment disease after single-segment posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Matsumoto T; Okuda S; Maeno T; Yamashita T; Yamasaki R; Sugiura T; Iwasaki M J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Apr; 26(4):435-440. PubMed ID: 28059683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of sagittal spinopelvic alignment on clinical outcomes after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis without coronal imbalance. Hikata T; Watanabe K; Fujita N; Iwanami A; Hosogane N; Ishii K; Nakamura M; Toyama Y; Matsumoto M J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Oct; 23(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 26140404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of Sagittal Spinal Balance on the Outcome of Decompression Surgery for Lumbar Canal Stenosis. Chang HS World Neurosurg; 2018 Nov; 119():e200-e208. PubMed ID: 30036716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relationships between Paraspinal Muscle and Spinopelvic Sagittal Balance in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Wang W; Sun Z; Li W; Chen Z Orthop Surg; 2022 Jun; 14(6):1093-1099. PubMed ID: 35478489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Short Lumbosacral Decompression Plus Fixation Does Not Change the Spinopelvic Balance on Patients With Moderate Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and Associated Spinal Stenosis. Korovessis P; Syrimpeis V; Tsekouras V Spine Deform; 2019 Mar; 7(2):346-355. PubMed ID: 30660232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of decompression surgery without fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis on sagittal spinopelvic alignment: minimum 2-year follow-up. Ogura Y; Shinozaki Y; Kobayashi Y; Kitagawa T; Yonezawa Y; Takahashi Y; Yoshida K; Yasuda A; Ogawa J J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 Jun; 30(6):743-749. PubMed ID: 30771778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The sagittal spinal profile type: a principal precondition for surgical decision making in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Bayerl SH; Pöhlmann F; Finger T; Franke J; Woitzik J; Vajkoczy P J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Nov; 27(5):552-559. PubMed ID: 28862573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Compensation Characteristics of Spinal Sagittal Malalignment According to Pelvic Incidence in Elderly Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Wang DF; Li XY; Wang W; Li YJ; Kong C; Lu SB Orthop Surg; 2023 Jul; 15(7):1884-1892. PubMed ID: 37382444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of postoperative sagittal balance and spinopelvic parameters on the outcome of patients surgically treated for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Radovanovic I; Urquhart JC; Ganapathy V; Siddiqi F; Gurr KR; Bailey SI; Bailey CS J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Apr; 26(4):448-453. PubMed ID: 28106523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sagittal Parameters of Spine-Pelvis-Hip Joints in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Xu S; Guo C; Liang Y; Zhu Z; Liu H Orthop Surg; 2022 Nov; 14(11):2854-2862. PubMed ID: 36125192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Change of Clinical and Radiologic Parameters after Minimally Invasive Decompression in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Prospective Study with Long-term Follow-up. Pennisi G; D'Ercole M; Izzo A; Polli FM; Rapisarda A; Papacci F; Olivi A; Montano N J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2024 Jan; 85(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 35901813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of the difference between lumbar lordosis in the supine and standing positions on the clinical outcomes of decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Nakano S; Inoue M; Takahashi H; Kubota G; Saito J; Norimoto M; Koyama K; Watanabe A; Nakajima T; Sato Y; Ohyama S; Orita S; Eguchi Y; Inage K; Shiga Y; Sonobe M; Nakajima A; Ohtori S; Nakagawa K; Aoki Y J Neurosurg Spine; 2022 Apr; 36(4):542-548. PubMed ID: 34715669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mid-term changes in spinopelvic sagittal alignment in lumbar spinal stenosis with coexisting degenerative spondylolisthesis or scoliosis after minimally invasive lumbar decompression surgery: minimum five-year follow-up. Salimi H; Toyoda H; Terai H; Yamada K; Hoshino M; Suzuki A; Takahashi S; Tamai K; Hori Y; Yabu A; Nakamura H Spine J; 2022 May; 22(5):819-826. PubMed ID: 34813957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of one- or two-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion on global sagittal balance. Cho JH; Joo YS; Lim C; Hwang CJ; Lee DH; Lee CS Spine J; 2017 Dec; 17(12):1794-1802. PubMed ID: 28579287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]