119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37236617)
1. Feasibility and Utility of a Fitbit Tracker Among Ambulatory Children and Youth With Disabilities.
Bremer E; Arbour-Nicitopoulos KP; Tsui B; Ginis KAM; Moore SA; Best KL; Voss C
Pediatr Exerc Sci; 2023 Nov; 35(4):249-257. PubMed ID: 37236617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Mobile Health Team Challenge to Promote Stepping and Stair Climbing Activities: Exploratory Feasibility Study.
Liew SJ; Gorny AW; Tan CS; Müller-Riemenschneider F
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Feb; 8(2):e12665. PubMed ID: 32014845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Physical Activity Monitoring Using a Fitbit Device in Ischemic Stroke Patients: Prospective Cohort Feasibility Study.
Katzan I; Schuster A; Kinzy T
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jan; 9(1):e14494. PubMed ID: 33464213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implementation of a school-based Fitbit program for youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A feasibility study.
Garcia JM; Leahy N; Brazendale K; Quelly S; Lawrence S
Disabil Health J; 2021 Apr; 14(2):100990. PubMed ID: 33011113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity of Commercial Activity Trackers in Children With Congenital Heart Disease.
Voss C; Gardner RF; Dean PH; Harris KC
Can J Cardiol; 2017 Jun; 33(6):799-805. PubMed ID: 28347581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measuring Daily Compliance With Physical Activity Tracking in Ambulatory Surgery Patients: Comparative Analysis of Five Compliance Criteria.
Kelly R; Jones S; Price B; Katz D; McCormick C; Pearce O
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jan; 9(1):e22846. PubMed ID: 33496677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validating Fitbit Zip for monitoring physical activity of children in school: a cross-sectional study.
Mooses K; Oja M; Reisberg S; Vilo J; Kull M
BMC Public Health; 2018 Jul; 18(1):858. PubMed ID: 29996797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acceptability and feasibility of a Fitbit physical activity monitor for endometrial cancer survivors.
Rossi A; Frechette L; Miller D; Miller E; Friel C; Van Arsdale A; Lin J; Shankar V; Kuo DYS; Nevadunsky NS
Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 149(3):470-475. PubMed ID: 29692337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fitbit Use and Activity Levels From Intervention to 2 Years After: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Hartman SJ; Chen R; Tam RM; Narayan HK; Natarajan L; Liu L
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2022 Jun; 10(6):e37086. PubMed ID: 35771607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of the Fitbit Charge 2 compared to the ActiGraph GT3X+ in older adults with knee osteoarthritis in free-living conditions.
Collins JE; Yang HY; Trentadue TP; Gong Y; Losina E
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0211231. PubMed ID: 30699159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Consumer-based activity trackers in evaluation of physical activity in myositis patients.
Saygin D; Rockette-Wagner B; Oddis C; Neiman N; Koontz D; Moghadam-Kia S; Aggarwal R
Rheumatology (Oxford); 2022 Jul; 61(7):2951-2958. PubMed ID: 34528065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fit24, a digital health intervention to reduce type 2 diabetes risk among Hispanic youth: Protocol for a feasibility pilot study.
Soltero EG; Lopez C; Musaad SM; O'Connor TM; Thompson D
Contemp Clin Trials; 2023 Apr; 127():107117. PubMed ID: 36775009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A wearable activity tracker intervention for promoting physical activity in adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a pilot study.
Heale LD; Dover S; Goh YI; Maksymiuk VA; Wells GD; Feldman BM
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J; 2018 Oct; 16(1):66. PubMed ID: 30348203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of consumer-based activity trackers as measuring tool and coaching device in patients with COPD and healthy controls.
Blondeel A; Demeyer H; Janssens W; Troosters T
PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0236676. PubMed ID: 32750073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interest and preferences for using advanced physical activity tracking devices: results of a national cross-sectional survey.
Alley S; Schoeppe S; Guertler D; Jennings C; Duncan MJ; Vandelanotte C
BMJ Open; 2016 Jul; 6(7):e011243. PubMed ID: 27388359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feasibility of Fitbit Use in Adolescent Survivors of Pediatric Cancer: Who Consistently Uses It and for How Long?
Williamson Lewis R; Howell KE; Effinger KE; Meacham LR; Wasilewski-Masker K; Mertens A; Gilleland Marchak J
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol; 2023 Aug; 12(4):529-536. PubMed ID: 36178482
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Reference Values for Wristband Accelerometry Data in Children Aged 6-11 Years of Age.
Lammers AE; Romanowski AL; Baumgartner H; Diller GP; Uebing A
Front Pediatr; 2022; 10():808372. PubMed ID: 35498803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimating Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in a Free-Living Context: A Pragmatic Comparison of Consumer-Based Activity Trackers and ActiGraph Accelerometry.
Gomersall SR; Ng N; Burton NW; Pavey TG; Gilson ND; Brown WJ
J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e239. PubMed ID: 27604226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of Fitbit Devices in Physical Activity Intervention Studies Across the Life Course: Narrative Review.
St Fleur RG; St George SM; Leite R; Kobayashi M; Agosto Y; Jake-Schoffman DE
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 May; 9(5):e23411. PubMed ID: 34047705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of wrist-worn Fitbit Flex and waist-worn ActiGraph for measuring steps in free-living adults.
Chu AH; Ng SH; Paknezhad M; Gauterin A; Koh D; Brown MS; Müller-Riemenschneider F
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172535. PubMed ID: 28234953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
