These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37237112)

  • 1. Active control time: an objective performance metric for trainee participation in robotic surgery.
    Clanahan JM; Yee A; Awad MM
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Oct; 17(5):2117-2123. PubMed ID: 37237112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of targeted educational resources to improve robotic bariatric surgery training.
    Clanahan JM; Awad MM; Dimou FM
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Feb; 38(2):894-901. PubMed ID: 37823946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automated task-level autonomy assessment in robotic surgery.
    Gerull WD; Liebendorfer A; Awad MM
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Oct; 38(10):6033-6036. PubMed ID: 39110222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The robot doesn't lie: real-life validation of robotic performance metrics.
    Quinn KM; Chen X; Runge LT; Pieper H; Renton D; Meara M; Collins C; Griffiths C; Husain S
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Jul; 37(7):5547-5552. PubMed ID: 36266482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Objective assessment in residency-based training for transoral robotic surgery.
    Curry M; Malpani A; Li R; Tantillo T; Jog A; Blanco R; Ha PK; Califano J; Kumar R; Richmon J
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Oct; 122(10):2184-92. PubMed ID: 22915265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An Objective Assessment of Performance during Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: Validation and Correlation of Automated Performance Metrics with Intraoperative Outcomes.
    Ghodoussipour S; Reddy SS; Ma R; Huang D; Nguyen J; Hung AJ
    J Urol; 2021 May; 205(5):1294-1302. PubMed ID: 33356480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Comparison of Robotic Simulation Performance on Basic Virtual Reality Skills: Simulator Subjective Versus Objective Assessment Tools.
    Dubin AK; Smith R; Julian D; Tanaka A; Mattingly P
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(7):1184-1189. PubMed ID: 28757439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Colon and Rectal Surgery Robotic Training Programs: An Evaluation of Gender Disparities.
    Foley KE; Izquierdo KM; von Muchow MG; Bastawrous AL; Cleary RK; Soliman MK
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2020 Jul; 63(7):974-979. PubMed ID: 32229780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of robotic single and dual console systems in the training of minimally invasive gynecology surgery (MIGS) fellows.
    Leon MG; Carrubba AR; DeStephano CC; Heckman MG; Craver EC; Dinh TA
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Dec; 16(6):1273-1280. PubMed ID: 35025036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A multifactorial evaluation of objective performance indicators and video analysis in the context of case complexity and clinical outcomes in robotic-assisted cholecystectomy.
    Kaoukabani G; Gokcal F; Fanta A; Liu X; Shields M; Stricklin C; Friedman A; Kudsi OY
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Nov; 37(11):8540-8551. PubMed ID: 37789179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ratio of Economy of Motion: A New Objective Performance Indicator to Assign Consoles During Dual-Console Robotic Proctectomy.
    Devin CL; Gillani M; Shields MC; Eldredge K; Kucera W; Rupji M; Purvis LA; Paul Olson TJ; Liu Y; Jarc A; Rosen SA
    Am Surg; 2023 Aug; 89(8):3416-3422. PubMed ID: 36898676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Expectations versus reality: trainee participation on the robotic console in academic surgery.
    Wang VL; Pieper H; Gupta A; Chen X; Husain S; Meara M
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Aug; 35(8):4805-4810. PubMed ID: 32780235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differences in coaching in single- versus dual-console robotic cases: a mixed-methods study.
    Anand A; Gan C; Jensen R; Korndorffer JR
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Oct; 38(10):6008-6016. PubMed ID: 39090198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What are clinically relevant performance metrics in robotic surgery? A systematic review of the literature.
    Younes MM; Larkins K; To G; Burke G; Heriot A; Warrier S; Mohan H
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Apr; 17(2):335-350. PubMed ID: 36190655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of robotic assistance on mental workload and cognitive performance of surgical trainees performing a complex minimally invasive suturing task.
    Lau E; Alkhamesi NA; Schlachta CM
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Jun; 34(6):2551-2559. PubMed ID: 31482359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Incorporating a Detailed Case Log System to Standardize Robotic Colon and Rectal Surgery Resident Training and Performance Evaluation.
    Martin R; Hsu J; Soliman MK; Bastawrous AL; Cleary RK
    J Surg Educ; 2019; 76(4):1022-1029. PubMed ID: 30665735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Face, content and construct validity of a novel robotic surgery simulator.
    Hung AJ; Zehnder P; Patil MB; Cai J; Ng CK; Aron M; Gill IS; Desai MM
    J Urol; 2011 Sep; 186(3):1019-24. PubMed ID: 21784469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transferability of robotic console skills by early robotic surgeons: a multi-platform crossover trial of simulation training.
    Larkins KM; Mohan HM; Gray M; Costello DM; Costello AJ; Heriot AG; Warrier SK
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Jun; 17(3):859-867. PubMed ID: 36324049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Developing basic robotic skills using virtual reality simulation and automated assessment tools: a multidisciplinary robotic virtual reality-based curriculum using the Da Vinci Skills Simulator and tracking progress with the Intuitive Learning platform.
    Gleason A; Servais E; Quadri S; Manganiello M; Cheah YL; Simon CJ; Preston E; Graham-Stephenson A; Wright V
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Dec; 16(6):1313-1319. PubMed ID: 35066791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative assessment of three standardized robotic surgery training methods.
    Hung AJ; Jayaratna IS; Teruya K; Desai MM; Gill IS; Goh AC
    BJU Int; 2013 Oct; 112(6):864-71. PubMed ID: 23470136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.