These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37237240)

  • 1. Predictors of poor outcome following lumbar spinal fusion surgery: a prospective observational study to derive two clinical prediction rules using British Spine Registry data.
    Rushton AB; Jadhakhan F; Verra ML; Emms A; Heneghan NR; Falla D; Reddington M; Cole AA; Willems PC; Benneker L; Selvey D; Hutton M; Heymans MW; Staal JB
    Eur Spine J; 2023 Jul; 32(7):2303-2318. PubMed ID: 37237240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and validation of two clinical prediction models to inform clinical decision-making for lumbar spinal fusion surgery for degenerative disorders and rehabilitation following surgery: protocol for a prospective observational study.
    Rushton AB; Verra ML; Emms A; Heneghan NR; Falla D; Reddington M; Cole AA; Willems P; Benneker L; Selvey D; Hutton M; Heymans MW; Staal JB
    BMJ Open; 2018 May; 8(5):e021078. PubMed ID: 29789351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database, Part 1. Disability, quality of life, and pain outcomes following lumbar spine surgery: predicting likely individual patient outcomes for shared decision-making.
    McGirt MJ; Bydon M; Archer KR; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Parker SL; Nian H; Harrell FE; Speroff T; Dittus RS; Philips SE; Shaffrey CI; Foley KT; Asher AL
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):357-369. PubMed ID: 28498074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A novel lumbar total joint replacement may be an improvement over fusion for degenerative lumbar conditions: a comparative analysis of patient-reported outcomes at one year.
    Alex Sielatycki J; Devin CJ; Pennings J; Koscielski M; Metcalf T; Archer KR; Dunn R; Craig Humphreys S; Hodges S
    Spine J; 2021 May; 21(5):829-840. PubMed ID: 33346156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prognostic factors associated with best outcomes (minimal symptom state) following fusion for lumbar degenerative conditions.
    Crawford CH; Glassman SD; Djurasovic M; Owens RK; Gum JL; Carreon LY
    Spine J; 2019 Feb; 19(2):187-190. PubMed ID: 29960112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prediction model for outcome after low-back surgery: individualized likelihood of complication, hospital readmission, return to work, and 12-month improvement in functional disability.
    McGirt MJ; Sivaganesan A; Asher AL; Devin CJ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Dec; 39(6):E13. PubMed ID: 26621411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database, Part 2. Predictive model for return to work after elective surgery for lumbar degenerative disease.
    Asher AL; Devin CJ; Archer KR; Chotai S; Parker SL; Bydon M; Nian H; Harrell FE; Speroff T; Dittus RS; Philips SE; Shaffrey CI; Foley KT; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):370-381. PubMed ID: 28498069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do measures of surgical effectiveness at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery accurately predict 2-year outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Elsamadicy AA; Han JL; Cheng J; Karikari I; Bagley CA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):689-696. PubMed ID: 26722957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE
    World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting SF-6D utility scores from the Oswestry disability index and numeric rating scales for back and leg pain.
    Carreon LY; Glassman SD; McDonough CM; Rampersaud R; Berven S; Shainline M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(19):2085-9. PubMed ID: 19730215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of obesity on clinical outcomes after lumbar fusion.
    Djurasovic M; Bratcher KR; Glassman SD; Dimar JR; Carreon LY
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jul; 33(16):1789-92. PubMed ID: 18628712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Women do not fare worse than men after lumbar fusion surgery: Two-year follow-up results from 4,780 prospectively collected patients in the Swedish National Spine Register with lumbar degenerative disc disease and chronic low back pain.
    Triebel J; Snellman G; Sandén B; Strömqvist F; Robinson Y
    Spine J; 2017 May; 17(5):656-662. PubMed ID: 27845232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Pain and Functional Outcomes After Lumbar Spine Surgery.
    Khor S; Lavallee D; Cizik AM; Bellabarba C; Chapman JR; Howe CR; Lu D; Mohit AA; Oskouian RJ; Roh JR; Shonnard N; Dagal A; Flum DR
    JAMA Surg; 2018 Jul; 153(7):634-642. PubMed ID: 29516096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decision making in surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion.
    Willems P
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2013 Feb; 84(349):1-35. PubMed ID: 23427903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preoperative Factors Predict Postoperative Trajectories of Pain and Disability Following Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Hébert JJ; Abraham E; Wedderkopp N; Bigney E; Richardson E; Darling M; Hall H; Fisher CG; Rampersaud YR; Thomas KC; Jacobs WB; Johnson M; Paquet J; Attabib N; Jarzem P; Wai EK; Rasoulinejad P; Ahn H; Nataraj A; Stratton A; Manson N
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Nov; 45(21):E1421-E1430. PubMed ID: 32541610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patients with predominantly back pain at the time of lumbar fusion for low-grade spondylolisthesis experience similar clinical improvement to patients with predominantly leg pain: mid-term results.
    Khan JM; Harada GK; Basques BA; Nolte MT; Louie PK; Iloanya M; Tchalukov K; Berkowitz M; Derman P; Colman M; An HS
    Spine J; 2020 Feb; 20(2):276-282. PubMed ID: 31563578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anterolateral versus posterior minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion surgery for spondylolisthesis: comparison of outcomes from a global, multicenter study at 12-months follow-up.
    Pereira P; Park Y; Arzoglou V; Charles YP; Krutko A; Senker W; Park SW; Franke J; Fuentes S; Bordon G; Song Y; He S; Vialle E; Mlyavykh S; Varanda P; Hosszu T; Bhagat S; Hong JY; Vanhauwaert D; de la Dehesa P
    Spine J; 2023 Oct; 23(10):1494-1505. PubMed ID: 37236367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictors of outcome after decompressive lumbar surgery and instrumented posterolateral fusion.
    Cobo Soriano J; Sendino Revuelta M; Fabregate Fuente M; Cimarra Díaz I; Martínez Ureña P; Deglané Meneses R
    Eur Spine J; 2010 Nov; 19(11):1841-8. PubMed ID: 20135333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is There an Association Between Radiological Severity of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Disability, Pain, or Surgical Outcome?: A Multicenter Observational Study.
    Weber C; Giannadakis C; Rao V; Jakola AS; Nerland U; Nygaard ØP; Solberg TK; Gulati S; Solheim O
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(2):E78-83. PubMed ID: 26352747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do preoperative clinical and radiographic characteristics impact patient outcomes following one-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion based upon presenting symptoms?
    Morse KW; Alluri RK; Vaishnav AS; Urakawa H; Mok JK; Virk SS; Sheha ED; Qureshi SA
    Spine J; 2022 Apr; 22(4):570-577. PubMed ID: 34699995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.