These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37241024)

  • 1. Morphological Variation of the Mandible in the Orthognathic Population-A Morphological Study Using Statistical Shape Modelling.
    van der Wel H; Qiu B; Spijkervet FKL; Jansma J; Schepers RH; Kraeima J
    J Pers Med; 2023 May; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 37241024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A novel measurement method for the morphology of the mandibular ramus using homologous modelling.
    Inoue K; Nakano H; Sumida T; Yamada T; Otawa N; Fukuda N; Nakajima Y; Kumamaru W; Mishima K; Kouchi M; Takahashi I; Mori Y
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(8):20150062. PubMed ID: 26143939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of 3D statistical mandible models for cephalometric measurements.
    Kim SG; Yi WJ; Hwang SJ; Choi SC; Lee SS; Heo MS; Huh KH; Kim TI; Hong H; Yoo JH
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2012 Sep; 42(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 23071968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computerized cephalometric evaluation of orthognathic surgical precision and stability in relation to maxillary superior repositioning combined with mandibular advancement or setback.
    Donatsky O; Bjørn-Jørgensen J; Holmqvist-Larsen M; Hillerup S
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1997 Oct; 55(10):1071-9; discussion 1079-80. PubMed ID: 9331229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mandibular Gender Dimorphism: The Utility of Artificial Intelligence and Statistical Shape Modeling in Skeletal Facial Analysis.
    Rames JD; Hussein SM; Shehab AA; Pazelli AM; Sears VA; Wentworth AJ; Morris JM; Sharaf BA
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2024 Nov; 48(21):4272-4279. PubMed ID: 39187587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relationship between the changes in three-dimensional facial morphology and mandibular movement after orthognathic surgery.
    Kim DS; Huh KH; Lee SS; Heo MS; Choi SC; Hwang SJ; Yi WJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 41(7):686-93. PubMed ID: 23465640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shape variation and sex differences of the adult human mandible evaluated by geometric morphometrics.
    Chalazoniti A; Lattanzi W; Halazonetis DJ
    Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):8546. PubMed ID: 38609399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simultaneous Orthognathic Surgery and Mandibular Contour Osteoplasty for Treating Mandibular Protrusion With High Gonial Angle.
    Zhang Y; Sun X; Wang L; Chen K; Wang X; Wu G
    J Craniofac Surg; 2020; 31(5):1362-1366. PubMed ID: 32282664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comprehensive Analysis of Mandibular Residual Asymmetry after Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Correction of Menton Point Deviation.
    Lin H; Zhu P; Lin Q; Huang X; Xu Y; Yang X
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0161601. PubMed ID: 27571364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The morphology of the human mandible: A computational modelling study.
    Vallabh R; Zhang J; Fernandez J; Dimitroulis G; Ackland DC
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2020 Aug; 19(4):1187-1202. PubMed ID: 30826909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Planning of mandibular reconstructions based on statistical shape models.
    Raith S; Wolff S; Steiner T; Modabber A; Weber M; Hölzle F; Fischer H
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Jan; 12(1):99-112. PubMed ID: 27393280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of condylar position in orthognathic surgery cases treated with virtual surgical planning vs. conventional model planning.
    Wan Y; Jackson T; Chung C; Gao F; Blakey G; Nguyen T
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2019 May; 22 Suppl 1():142-148. PubMed ID: 31074137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of shape correspondence analysis to quantify skeletal changes associated with bone-anchored Class III correction.
    Nguyen T; Cevidanes L; Paniagua B; Zhu H; Koerich L; De Clerck H
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Mar; 84(2):329-36. PubMed ID: 23886012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term three-dimensional condylar remodeling during presurgical orthodontics and after orthognathic surgery of mandibular retrognathia with high mandibular plane angle.
    Al-Rezami KF; Abotaleb BM; Alkebsi K; Wang R; Al-Nasri A; Sakran K; Aladimi M; Yang P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Dec; 26(12):7253-7263. PubMed ID: 35978222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Location, shape and anatomic relations of the mandibular foramen and the mandibular lingula: a contribution to surgical procedures in the ramus of the mandible.
    Lima FJ; Oliveira Neto OB; Barbosa FT; Sousa-Rodrigues CF
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Jun; 20(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 26781719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Early mandibular morphological differences in patients with FGFR2 and FGFR3-related syndromic craniosynostoses: A 3D comparative study.
    Morice A; Cornette R; Giudice A; Collet C; Paternoster G; Arnaud É; Galliani E; Picard A; Legeai-Mallet L; Khonsari RH
    Bone; 2020 Dec; 141():115600. PubMed ID: 32822871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mandibular Spatial Reorientation and Morphological Alteration of Crouzon and Apert Syndrome.
    Lu X; Sawh-Martinez R; Forte AJ; Wu R; Cabrejo R; Wilson A; Steinbacher DM; Alperovich M; Alonso N; Persing JA
    Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Nov; 83(5):568-582. PubMed ID: 31008788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 3D quantification of mandibular asymmetry using the SPHARM-PDM tool box.
    Alhadidi A; Cevidanes LH; Paniagua B; Cook R; Festy F; Tyndall D
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2012 Mar; 7(2):265-71. PubMed ID: 22089896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Condylar repositioning according to digital bite registration method for virtual orthognathic surgery planning: A series of 49 consecutive patients.
    Fricain M; Charavet C; Raoult AG; Oueiss A; Savoldelli C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Sep; 162(3):e133-e140. PubMed ID: 35835701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of condylar surface CT values related to condylar height reduction after orthognathic surgery.
    Ueki K; Yoshizawa K; Saito Y; Takayama A; Baba N; Kimura Y; Koizumi M; Fujimoto K; Iguchi R; Sato M; Osada AH; Moroi A
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2021 Aug; 49(8):639-648. PubMed ID: 33994298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.