These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3724111)

  • 1. Masked and filtered simulation of hearing loss: effects on consonant recognition.
    Fabry DA; Van Tasell DJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Jun; 29(2):170-8. PubMed ID: 3724111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors governing speech reception benefits of adaptive linear filtering for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Rankovic CM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Feb; 103(2):1043-57. PubMed ID: 9479758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frequency selectivity and consonant intelligibility in sensorineural hearing loss.
    Preminger J; Wiley TL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Jun; 28(2):197-206. PubMed ID: 4010249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of amplification on the discrimination of dichotic consonant-vowel syllables in a population with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Jacobson JT; McCandless GA; Mahoney TM
    Audiology; 1979; 18(6):522-36. PubMed ID: 526197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consonant-vowel intensity ratios for maximizing consonant recognition by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kennedy E; Levitt H; Neuman AC; Weiss M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Feb; 103(2):1098-114. PubMed ID: 9479764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Growth of low-pass masking of pure tones and speech for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Dec; 98(6):3113-24. PubMed ID: 8550937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tone-glide discrimination: normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Collins MJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Sep; 27(3):403-12. PubMed ID: 6482410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temporal intraspeech masking of plosive bursts: effects of hearing loss and frequency shaping.
    Mackersie CL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 50(3):554-63. PubMed ID: 17538099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory detection, discrimination and speech processing in ageing, noise-sensitive and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Abel SM; Krever EM; Alberti PW
    Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 2336540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recognition of nonsense syllables by hearing-impaired listeners and by noise-masked normal hearers.
    Humes LE; Dirks DD; Bell TS; Kincaid GE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Mar; 81(3):765-73. PubMed ID: 3584685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Children's speech recognition scores: the Speech Intelligibility Index and proficiency factors for age and hearing level.
    Scollie SD
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):543-56. PubMed ID: 18469717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Consonant-recognition patterns and self-assessment of hearing handicap.
    Hustedde CG; Wiley TL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Dec; 34(6):1397-409. PubMed ID: 1787721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners.
    Dubno JR; Schaefer AB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2110-21. PubMed ID: 1597602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frequency selectivity and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners with equivalent masked thresholds.
    Dubno JR; Schaefer AB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Feb; 97(2):1165-74. PubMed ID: 7876438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Consonant identification in noise using Hilbert-transform temporal fine-structure speech and recovered-envelope speech for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Léger AC; Reed CM; Desloge JG; Swaminathan J; Braida LD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):389-403. PubMed ID: 26233038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Masked thresholds and consonant recognition in low-pass maskers for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Apr; 97(4):2430-41. PubMed ID: 7714260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of Simulated Hearing Loss on Bilingual Children's Consonant Recognition in Noise.
    Nishi K; Trevino AC; Rosado Rogers L; García P; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e292-e304. PubMed ID: 28353522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory perception of speech contrasts by subjects with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Boothroyd A
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Mar; 27(1):134-44. PubMed ID: 6716999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationship of aided speech recognition to hearing thresholds and aided speech-peak sensation levels in severely and profoundly hearing-impaired adults.
    Parkinson AJ; Newall P; Byrne D; Plant G
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1996 Oct; 7(5):305-21. PubMed ID: 8898267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech-cue transmission by an algorithm to increase consonant recognition in noise for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Healy EW; Yoho SE; Wang Y; Apoux F; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Dec; 136(6):3325. PubMed ID: 25480077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.