These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3724121)

  • 21. A comparison of procedures and materials for speech reception thresholds.
    Robinson DO; Koenigs MJ
    J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 4(6):227-30. PubMed ID: 511650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Test-retest reliability of the Freiburg monosyllabic speech test].
    Winkler A; Holube I
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):564-71. PubMed ID: 27286728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Polish sentence matrix test for speech intelligibility measurement in noise.
    Ozimek E; Warzybok A; Kutzner D
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):444-54. PubMed ID: 20482292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The intelligibility of sentences in quiet and in noise in aged listeners.
    Duquesnoy AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Oct; 74(4):1136-44. PubMed ID: 6643835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Hearing Loss in Children With Otitis Media With Effusion: Actual and Simulated Effects on Speech Perception.
    Cai T; McPherson B; Li C; Yang F
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):645-655. PubMed ID: 29176394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [The Freiburg monosyllable word test in postoperative cochlear implant diagnostics].
    Hey M; Brademann G; Ambrosch P
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):601-7. PubMed ID: 27393292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Development of a new test for speech audiometry in children and results in CI children].
    Völter C; Shehata-Dieler W; Baumann R; Helms J
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Oct; 84(10):738-43. PubMed ID: 16231241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. "How I do it"--otology and neurology. A specific issue and its solution. Silent masking.
    Brown LA
    Laryngoscope; 1978 Dec; 88(12):2035. PubMed ID: 732501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Closed-Set Speech Discrimination Tests for Assessing Young Children.
    Vickers DA; Moore BCJ; Majeed A; Stephenson N; Alferaih H; Baer T; Marriage JE
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 29189292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Spanish Pediatric Speech Recognition Threshold Test.
    Mendel LL; Pousson M; Bass JK; Lunsford RE; McNiece C
    Am J Audiol; 2019 Sep; 28(3):597-604. PubMed ID: 31339736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Characteristics, advantages, and limits of matrix tests].
    Brand T; Wagener KC
    HNO; 2017 Mar; 65(3):182-188. PubMed ID: 27538937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The digits-in-noise test: assessing auditory speech recognition abilities in noise.
    Smits C; Theo Goverts S; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1693-706. PubMed ID: 23464039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparing two methods of preschool and kindergarten hearing screening.
    Hamill B
    J Sch Health; 1988 Mar; 58(3):95-7. PubMed ID: 3352234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Identification audiometry: component effectiveness and relationship of hearing status to developmental functioning with four-year-olds.
    Thompson RJ; Gothard DC; Sturm JM; Rogister SH
    J Aud Res; 1979 Jul; 19(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 553925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and revised Tillman-Olsen methods for speech threshold measurement.
    Huff SJ; Nerbonne MA
    Ear Hear; 1982; 3(6):335-9. PubMed ID: 7152157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reliability of threshold, slope, and PB max for monosyllabic words.
    Beattie RC; Raffin MJ
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1985 May; 50(2):166-78. PubMed ID: 3990262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Children's speech recognition scores: the Speech Intelligibility Index and proficiency factors for age and hearing level.
    Scollie SD
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):543-56. PubMed ID: 18469717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [The Freiburg speech intelligibility test : A pillar of speech audiometry in German-speaking countries].
    Hoth S
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):540-8. PubMed ID: 27259640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.