109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3724183)
1. A misleading flow cytometric analysis of DNA in an adenocarcinoma: a comparative flow cytometric and cytogenetic study.
Lee GM; Youngberg GA
J Surg Oncol; 1986 Apr; 31(4):275-8. PubMed ID: 3724183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of ploidy in colorectal tumors. A comparison between flow cytometry and cytogenetics.
Laquerriere A; Peulve P; Scotte MA; Ma SX; Paresy M; Teniere P; Hemet J
Dig Dis Sci; 1993 Oct; 38(10):1788-92. PubMed ID: 8404398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cytogenetic and corresponding flow cytometric DNA analysis of renal cell neoplasms.
el-Naggar AK; Pathak S
Anticancer Res; 1992; 12(5):1491-500. PubMed ID: 1444211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. DNA ploidy in human colorectal adenocarcinomas.
Steinbeck RG; Heselmeyer KM; Neugebauer WF; Falkmer UG; Auer GU
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1993 Jun; 15(3):187-94. PubMed ID: 8347258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bilateral familial carotid body paragangliomas. Report of a case with DNA flow cytometric and cytogenetic analyses.
Granger JK; Houn HY
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1990 Dec; 114(12):1272-5. PubMed ID: 1701297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of flow cytometric DNA content in primary gastric carcinoma and metastases.
Umehara Y; Kimura T; Yoshida M; Oba N; Harada Y
J Surg Oncol; 1992 Jul; 50(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 1619937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Flow cytometric DNA analysis of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of the colorectum.
Taniyama K; Suzuki H; Matsumoto M; Hakamada K; Toyama K; Tahara E
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 1991 Dec; 21(6):406-11. PubMed ID: 1805045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. DNA content and genetic evolution of human colorectal adenocarcinoma. A study by flow cytometry and cytogenetic analysis.
Remvikos Y; Muleris M; Vielh P; Salmon RJ; Dutrillaux B
Int J Cancer; 1988 Oct; 42(4):539-43. PubMed ID: 3170026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. DNA content in prostatic adenocarcinoma. A flow cytometry study of the predictive value of aneuploidy for tumor volume, percentage Gleason grade 4 and 5, and lymph node metastases.
Jones EC; McNeal J; Bruchovsky N; de Jong G
Cancer; 1990 Aug; 66(4):752-7. PubMed ID: 2386903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Flow cytometric analysis of the DNA content of adenocarcinoma of the lung, especially for patients with stage 1 disease with long term follow-up.
Tanaka I; Masuda R; Furuhata Y; Inoue M; Fujiwara M; Takemura T
Cancer; 1995 May; 75(10):2461-5. PubMed ID: 7736389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Flow cytometric analysis of primary and metastatic squamous cell carcinomas of the oral and maxillofacial region.
Suzuki K; Chen RB; Nomura T; Nakajima T
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1994 Aug; 52(8):855-61; discussion 861-2. PubMed ID: 8040741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Static and flow cytometric DNA analysis compared to histologic prognostic factors in a cohort of stage T2 breast cancer.
Arnerlöv C; Emdin SO; Roos G; Angström T; Bjersing L; Angquist KA; Jonsson H
Eur J Surg Oncol; 1990 Jun; 16(3):200-8. PubMed ID: 2347415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Flow cytometric analysis DNA content in esophageal carcinoma. Correlation with histologic and clinical features.
Yu JM; Yang LH; Guo-Qian ; Chen YT; Li X; Zhong WX; Chen JC; Tian GD
Cancer; 1989 Jul; 64(1):80-2. PubMed ID: 2731123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Flow cytometric analysis of squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity in relation to lymph node metastasis.
Chen RB; Suzuki K; Nomura T; Nakajima T
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1993 Apr; 51(4):397-401. PubMed ID: 8450358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Prognostic evaluation of endometrial carcinoma by DNA content and histologic factors].
Shimizu K
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1995 Apr; 47(4):413-8. PubMed ID: 7730696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Flow cytometric analysis of nuclear DNA content in esophageal cancer. Aneuploidy as an index for highly malignant potential.
Kaketani K; Saito T; Kobayashi M
Cancer; 1989 Aug; 64(4):887-91. PubMed ID: 2743280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relative prognostic significance of DNA flow cytometry and histologic grading in endometrial carcinoma.
Quillamor RM; Furlong JW; Hoschner JA; Wynn RM
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1988; 26(4):332-7. PubMed ID: 3229666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of DNA and karyotype aneuploidy in malignant lymphomas.
Lakkala T; Laasonen A; Franssila KO; Teerenhovi L; Knuutila S
Am J Clin Pathol; 1990 Nov; 94(5):600-5. PubMed ID: 2239823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Significance of multiparameter flow cytometric analysis of ovarian cancer.
Fowler WC; Maddock MB; Moore DH; Haskill S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Apr; 158(4):838-45. PubMed ID: 3163230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Flow cytometric analysis of DNA abnormalities in colorectal carcinomas.
Bocquillon PG; Daver A; Page M; Dalifard I; Chassevent A; Cellier P; Bertrand G; Larra F; George P; Chabrun B
Bull Cancer; 1989; 76(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 2736315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
