174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37242174)
21. Factors affecting consumer choice of novel non-thermally processed fruit and vegetables products: Evidence from a 4-country study in Europe.
Song X; Bredahl L; Diaz Navarro M; Pendenza P; Stojacic I; Mincione S; Pellegrini G; Schlüter OK; Torrieri E; Di Monaco R; Giacalone D
Food Res Int; 2022 Mar; 153():110975. PubMed ID: 35227487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Lithium: Perspectives of nutritional beneficence, dietary intake, biogeochemistry, and biofortification of vegetables and mushrooms.
Naeem A; Aslam M; Saifullah ; Mühling KH
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Dec; 798():149249. PubMed ID: 34329936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Consumer demand for novel fruit and vegetable products with extended shelf lives in East Africa: a multinational multi-product analysis.
Tepe J; Benali M; Lemken D
Public Health Nutr; 2022 Jun; 25(6):1472-1482. PubMed ID: 34889175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Iron-biofortified staple food crops for improving iron status: a review of the current evidence.
Finkelstein JL; Haas JD; Mehta S
Curr Opin Biotechnol; 2017 Apr; 44():138-145. PubMed ID: 28131049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Consumer attitudes and preferences towards pangasius and tilapia: The role of sustainability certification and the country of origin.
Hinkes C; Schulze-Ehlers B
Appetite; 2018 Aug; 127():171-181. PubMed ID: 29733863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Consumers' willingness to pay for nutritional claims fighting the obesity epidemic: the case of reduced-fat and low salt cheese in Spain.
de-Magistris T; Lopéz-Galán B
Public Health; 2016 Jun; 135():83-90. PubMed ID: 26996310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A study on Chinese consumer preferences for food traceability information using best-worst scaling.
Liu C; Li J; Steele W; Fang X
PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0206793. PubMed ID: 30388166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Investigating the market for cultivated meat as pet food: A survey analysis.
Oven A; Yoxon B; Milburn J
PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0275009. PubMed ID: 36584123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Acceptance and adoption of biofortified crops in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.
Talsma EF; Melse-Boonstra A; Brouwer ID
Nutr Rev; 2017 Oct; 75(10):798-829. PubMed ID: 29028269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The acceptance of zinc biofortified rice in Latin America: A consumer sensory study and grain quality characterization.
Woods BJ; Gallego-Castillo S; Talsma EF; Álvarez D
PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0242202. PubMed ID: 33175890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Factors influencing micronutrient bioavailability in biofortified crops.
Bechoff A; Dhuique-Mayer C
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2017 Feb; 1390(1):74-87. PubMed ID: 28009050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The Combined Application of the Caco-2 Cell Bioassay Coupled with In Vivo (Gallus gallus) Feeding Trial Represents an Effective Approach to Predicting Fe Bioavailability in Humans.
Tako E; Bar H; Glahn RP
Nutrients; 2016 Nov; 8(11):. PubMed ID: 27869705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Impact of sustainability and nutritional messaging on Italian consumers' purchase intent of cereal bars made with brewery spent grains.
Stelick A; Sogari G; Rodolfi M; Dando R; Paciulli M
J Food Sci; 2021 Feb; 86(2):531-539. PubMed ID: 33462803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Modelling protection behaviour towards micronutrient deficiencies: Case of iodine biofortified vegetable legumes as health intervention for school-going children.
Mogendi JB; De Steur H; Gellynck X; Makokha A
Nutr Res Pract; 2016 Feb; 10(1):56-66. PubMed ID: 26865917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Consumer willingness to pay for plant-based foods produced using microbial applications to replace synthetic chemical inputs.
Ali BM; Ang F; van der Fels-Klerx HJ
PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0260488. PubMed ID: 34874958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The credibility of the effects of functional food products and consumers' willingness to purchase/willingness to pay- review.
Plasek B; Temesi Á
Appetite; 2019 Dec; 143():104398. PubMed ID: 31401236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Advantages and limitations of in vitro and in vivo methods of iron and zinc bioavailability evaluation in the assessment of biofortification program effectiveness.
Dias DM; Costa NMB; Nutti MR; Tako E; Martino HSD
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr; 2018; 58(13):2136-2146. PubMed ID: 28414527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Willingness to eat bread with health benefits: habits, taste and health in bread choice.
Sajdakowska M; Gębski J; Żakowska-Biemans S; Jeżewska-Zychowicz M
Public Health; 2019 Feb; 167():78-87. PubMed ID: 30641459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. 'Yellow is good for you': Consumer perception and acceptability of fortified and biofortified cassava products.
Bechoff A; Chijioke U; Westby A; Tomlins KI
PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0203421. PubMed ID: 30216344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. How important is local food to organic-minded consumers?
Hempel C; Hamm U
Appetite; 2016 Jan; 96():309-318. PubMed ID: 26432955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
