These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37243843)

  • 1. The utility of cemented femoral stems in modern THA: a 10-year comparative analysis of the Charnley and Exeter stems.
    White-Gibson A; Sheridan GA; Ghetti AC; Keogh P; Kenny P; Cashman JP
    Ir J Med Sci; 2024 Feb; 193(1):251-255. PubMed ID: 37243843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of cemented femoral stem choice on the incidence of revision for periprosthetic fracture after primary total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of national joint registry data.
    Palan J; Smith MC; Gregg P; Mellon S; Kulkarni A; Tucker K; Blom AW; Murray DW; Pandit H
    Bone Joint J; 2016 Oct; 98-B(10):1347-1354. PubMed ID: 27694588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exeter and charnley arthroplasties with Boneloc or high viscosity cement. Comparison of 1,127 arthroplasties followed for 5 years in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
    Furnes O; Lie SA; Havelin LI; Vollset SE; Engesaeter LB
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1997 Dec; 68(6):515-20. PubMed ID: 9462347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 18 years of results with cemented primary hip prostheses in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: concerns about some newer implants.
    Espehaug B; Furnes O; Engesaeter LB; Havelin LI
    Acta Orthop; 2009 Aug; 80(4):402-12. PubMed ID: 19857178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Midterm Results of Primary Exeter Cemented Stem in a Select Patient Population.
    Gausden EB; Abdel MP; Mabry TM; Berry DJ; Trousdale RT; Sierra RJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2021 Oct; 103(19):1826-1833. PubMed ID: 33974592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Not all cemented hips are the same: a register-based (NJR) comparison of taper-slip and composite beam femoral stems.
    Kazi HA; Whitehouse SL; Howell JR; Timperley AJ
    Acta Orthop; 2019 Jun; 90(3):214-219. PubMed ID: 30838914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Equivalent revision rates and patient reported outcomes with routine use of a short (125mm) cemented stem for total hip arthroplasty compared to a standard length (150mm) cemented stem. A two surgeon series of 1335 patients.
    Boyle AB; Kuperus T; Maheno T; Frampton C; Vane A; Poutawera V
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2024 May; 144(5):2019-2026. PubMed ID: 38581441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is Cemented or Cementless Femoral Stem Fixation More Durable in Patients Older Than 75 Years of Age? A Comparison of the Best-performing Stems.
    Tanzer M; Graves SE; Peng A; Shimmin AJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jul; 476(7):1428-1437. PubMed ID: 29683803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What is the Role of Stem Size and Offset in the Risk of Nonseptic Revision of the Exeter® 150-mm Stem? A Study From the Swedish Arthroplasty Register.
    Itayem R; Rolfson O; Mohaddes M; Kärrholm J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2023 Sep; 481(9):1689-1699. PubMed ID: 37104550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. More reoperations for periprosthetic fracture after cemented hemiarthroplasty with polished taper-slip stems than after anatomical and straight stems in the treatment of hip fractures: a study from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register 2005 to 2016.
    Kristensen TB; Dybvik E; Furnes O; Engesæter LB; Gjertsen JE
    Bone Joint J; 2018 Dec; 100-B(12):1565-1571. PubMed ID: 30499310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture Is a Leading Cause of Early Revision With Taper-Slip Stems in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 2765 Total Hip Arthroplasties From a High-Volume Hospital.
    Pakarinen OA; Neuvonen PS; Lainiala OS; Reito ARP; Eskelinen AP
    J Arthroplasty; 2021 Nov; 36(11):3703-3708.e2. PubMed ID: 34253441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Influence of the Type of Hip-Component Fixation and Age of Patients on Mid-Term Revision Rate of Total Hip Replacement].
    Kubinec V
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2018; 85(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 30257769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Satisfactory Results of the Exeter Revision Femoral Stem Used for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Desy NM; Johnson JD; Sierra RJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Feb; 32(2):494-498. PubMed ID: 27600303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Current design and cement mantle thickness in hip arthroplasty : Theory and analysis of register data].
    Thomsen M; van Uden M; Kretzer JP
    Orthopadie (Heidelb); 2024 Jan; 53(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 37978051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes of Exeter cemented total hip arthroplasty in a county hospital: survivorship of eight hundred and ninety four hips with a minimum ten-year follow up.
    Kristóf J; Gupta D; Szabó L; Bucsi L; Zahár Á
    Int Orthop; 2024 Mar; 48(3):729-735. PubMed ID: 37914902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cement-in-cement femoral component revision : a comparison of two different taper-slip designs with medium-term follow up.
    Kennedy JW; Ng NYB; Young D; Kane N; Marsh AG; Meek RMD
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Jul; 103-B(7):1215-1221. PubMed ID: 34192939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Thirty years of experience with instrumented femoral impaction bone grafting and a cemented polished Exeter stem : a prospective cohort study of 208 revision arthroplasties performed between 1991 and 2007.
    Özdemir E; Kuijpers MFL; Visser J; Schreurs BW; Rijnen WHC
    Bone Joint J; 2022 Sep; 104-B(9):1039-1046. PubMed ID: 36047023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Polished Cemented Femoral Stems Have a Lower Rate of Revision Than Matt Finished Cemented Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 96,315 Cemented Femoral Stems.
    Hoskins W; van Bavel D; Lorimer M; de Steiger RN
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 May; 33(5):1472-1476. PubMed ID: 29310918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vancouver B periprosthetic fractures involving the Exeter cemented stem.
    Powell-Bowns MFR; Oag E; Ng N; Pandit H; Moran M; Patton JT; Clement ND; Scott CEH
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Feb; 103-B(2):309-320. PubMed ID: 33517729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. B2 or not B2? That is the question: a review of periprosthetic fractures around cemented taper-slip femoral components.
    Maggs JL; Swanton E; Whitehouse SL; Howell JR; Timperley AJ; Hubble MJW; Wilson MJ
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Jan; 103-B(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 33380191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.