These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37243843)

  • 21. Improved survival of uncemented versus cemented femoral stems in patients aged < 70 years in a community total joint registry.
    Wechter J; Comfort TK; Tatman P; Mehle S; Gioe TJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Nov; 471(11):3588-95. PubMed ID: 23873609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Uncemented or cemented stems in first-time revision total hip replacement? An observational study of 867 patients including assessment of femoral bone defect size.
    Tyson Y; Hillman C; Majenburg N; Sköldenberg O; Rolfson O; Kärrholm J; Mohaddes M; Hailer NP
    Acta Orthop; 2021 Apr; 92(2):143-150. PubMed ID: 33176549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Implant survival of the most common cemented total hip devices from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association database.
    Junnila M; Laaksonen I; Eskelinen A; Pulkkinen P; Ivar Havelin L; Furnes O; Marie Fenstad A; Pedersen AB; Overgaard S; Kärrholm J; Garellick G; Malchau H; Mäkelä KT
    Acta Orthop; 2016 Dec; 87(6):546-553. PubMed ID: 27550058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Is the Survivorship of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Better Than Selected Conventional Hip Arthroplasties in Men Younger Than 65 Years of Age? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Stoney J; Graves SE; de Steiger RN; Rainbird S; Kelly TL; Hatton A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Nov; 478(11):2625-2636. PubMed ID: 32898048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. What is the lifetime risk of revision for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty? a 40-year observational study of patients treated with the Charnley cemented total hip arthroplasty.
    Abdel MP; Roth PV; Harmsen WS; Berry DJ
    Bone Joint J; 2016 Nov; 98-B(11):1436-1440. PubMed ID: 27803217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. First-time revision using impacted morsellised allograft bone with a cemented Exeter stem: radiostereometric analysis of stem migration over nine years.
    Zampelis V; Ornstein E; Franzén H; Atroshi I
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Jun; 93(6):746-50. PubMed ID: 21586771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Long, titanium, cemented stems decreased late periprosthetic fractures and revisions in patients with severe bone loss and previous revision.
    Hernigou P; Dupuys N; Delambre J; Guissou I; Poignard A; Allain J; Flouzat Lachaniette CH
    Int Orthop; 2015 Apr; 39(4):639-44. PubMed ID: 25231573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cemented or uncemented acetabular fixation in combination with the Exeter Universal cemented stem.
    Gwynne-Jones DP; Gray AR
    Bone Joint J; 2020 Apr; 102-B(4):414-422. PubMed ID: 32228075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Should monobloc cemented stems be systematically revised during revision total hip arthroplasty? A prospective evaluation].
    Grosjean G; Courpied JP; Moindreau M; Hunou N; Mathieu M; Hamadouche M
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Nov; 94(7):670-7. PubMed ID: 18984124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Long-term outcome of cemented total hip arthroplasty with the Charnley-type femoral stem made of titanium alloy.
    Okutani Y; Goto K; Kuroda Y; Kawai T; Okuzu Y; Kawata T; Shimizu Y; Matsuda S
    J Orthop Sci; 2019 Nov; 24(6):1047-1052. PubMed ID: 31422864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Uncemented or cemented revision stems? Analysis of 2,296 first-time hip revision arthroplasties performed due to aseptic loosening, reported to the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
    Tyson Y; Rolfson O; Kärrholm J; Hailer NP; Mohaddes M
    Acta Orthop; 2019 Oct; 90(5):421-426. PubMed ID: 31154890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cement migration after THR. A comparison of charnley elite and exeter femoral stems using RSA.
    Alfaro-Adrián J; Gill HS; Murray DW
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1999 Jan; 81(1):130-4. PubMed ID: 10068020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The exeter cemented stem provides outstanding long-term fixation and bone load at 15 years follow-up: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Mancino F; Tornberg H; Jones CW; Bucher TA; Malahias MA
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2023; 31(1):10225536231153232. PubMed ID: 36655735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of the long-term outcome of cemented Charnley low-friction arthroplasty with hybrid arthroplasty in patients with congenital hip disease.
    Lampropoulou-Adamidou K; Hartofilakidis G
    Bone Joint J; 2019 Sep; 101-B(9):1050-1057. PubMed ID: 31474145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in patients fifty-five years of age or older. An analysis of the Finnish arthroplasty registry.
    Mäkelä KT; Eskelinen A; Pulkkinen P; Paavolainen P; Remes V
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Oct; 90(10):2160-70. PubMed ID: 18829914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The design of the acetabular component and size of the femoral head influence the risk of revision following 34 721 single-brand cemented hip replacements: a retrospective cohort study of medium-term data from a National Joint Registry.
    Jameson SS; Baker PN; Mason J; Gregg PJ; Brewster N; Deehan DJ; Reed MR
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Dec; 94(12):1611-7. PubMed ID: 23188900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Exeter Contemporary flanged cemented acetabular component in primary total hip arthroplasty.
    Maggs JL; Smeatham A; Whitehouse SL; Charity J; Timperley AJ; Gie GA
    Bone Joint J; 2016 Mar; 98-B(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 26920954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cemented Polished Tapered Stems Have Lower Revision Rates Than Commonly Used Cementless Implant up to 17 Years of Follow-Up: An Analysis of 201,889 Total Hip Replacements From the Australian Orthopedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Babazadeh S; de Steiger RN; Holder C; van Bavel D
    J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jan; 37(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 34592358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Uncemented and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
    Hailer NP; Garellick G; Kärrholm J
    Acta Orthop; 2010 Feb; 81(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 20180715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Long-Term Survival of the Cemented Exeter Universal Stem in Patients 50 Years and Younger: An Update on 130 Hips.
    Keeling P; Howell JR; Kassam AM; Sathu A; Timperley AJ; Hubble MJW; Wilson MJ; Whitehouse SL
    J Arthroplasty; 2020 Apr; 35(4):1042-1047. PubMed ID: 31882346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.