155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37243869)
21. Harmonization of PET image reconstruction parameters in simultaneous PET/MRI.
Laforest R; Khalighi M; Natsuaki Y; Rajagopal A; Chandramohan D; Byrd D; An H; Larson P; James SS; Sunderland JJ; Kinahan PE; Hope TA
EJNMMI Phys; 2021 Nov; 8(1):75. PubMed ID: 34739621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A CT-less approach to quantitative PET imaging using the LSO intrinsic radiation for long-axial FOV PET scanners.
Teimoorisichani M; Panin V; Rothfuss H; Sari H; Rominger A; Conti M
Med Phys; 2022 Jan; 49(1):309-323. PubMed ID: 34818446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Phantom-based evaluation of yttrium-90 datasets using biograph vision quadra.
Zeimpekis KG; Mercolli L; Conti M; Sari H; Prenosil G; Shi K; Rominger A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Mar; 50(4):1168-1182. PubMed ID: 36504278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. (90)Y -PET imaging: Exploring limitations and accuracy under conditions of low counts and high random fraction.
Carlier T; Willowson KP; Fourkal E; Bailey DL; Doss M; Conti M
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4295-309. PubMed ID: 26133627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Performance evaluation of the Biograph mCT Flow PET/CT system according to the NEMA NU2-2012 standard.
Rausch I; Cal-González J; Dapra D; Gallowitsch HJ; Lind P; Beyer T; Minear G
EJNMMI Phys; 2015 Dec; 2(1):26. PubMed ID: 26501827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Quantitative imaging characteristics of zirconium-89 on Gemini Time-Of-Flight PET/CT.
Alanazi SF; Alzimami KS; Ghannam MM; Aljammaz IJ; Alrumayan F; Sassi SA
Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Dec; 37(12):1238-1245. PubMed ID: 27749774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Spatial resolution and sensitivity of the Inveon small-animal PET scanner.
Visser EP; Disselhorst JA; Brom M; Laverman P; Gotthardt M; Oyen WJ; Boerman OC
J Nucl Med; 2009 Jan; 50(1):139-47. PubMed ID: 19139188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Performance characteristics of silicon photomultiplier based 15-cm AFOV TOF PET/CT.
Vandendriessche D; Uribe J; Bertin H; De Geeter F
EJNMMI Phys; 2019 May; 6(1):8. PubMed ID: 31076884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Application of the long axial field-of-view PET/CT with low-dose [
Sachpekidis C; Pan L; Kopp-Schneider A; Weru V; Hassel JC; Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Mar; 50(4):1158-1167. PubMed ID: 36474125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of spatial dependence of point spread function-based PET reconstruction using a traceable point-like
Murata T; Miwa K; Miyaji N; Wagatsuma K; Hasegawa T; Oda K; Umeda T; Iimori T; Masuda Y; Terauchi T; Koizumi M
EJNMMI Phys; 2016 Dec; 3(1):26. PubMed ID: 27783373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of image quality and spatial resolution between
Braune A; Oehme L; Freudenberg R; Hofheinz F; van den Hoff J; Kotzerke J; Hoberück S
EJNMMI Phys; 2022 Sep; 9(1):58. PubMed ID: 36064989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Investigation of the imaging characteristics of the ALBIRA II small animal PET system for
Attarwala AA; Karanja YW; Hardiansyah D; Romanó C; Roscher M; Wängler B; Glatting G
Z Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 27(2):132-144. PubMed ID: 28412013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Monte Carlo evaluation of hypothetical long axial field-of-view PET scanner using GE Discovery MI PET front-end architecture.
Tiwari A; Merrick M; Graves SA; Sunderland J
Med Phys; 2022 Feb; 49(2):1139-1152. PubMed ID: 34954831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Recovery coefficients determination for partial volume effect correction in oncological PET/CT images considering the effect of activity outside the field of view.
Krempser AR; Ichinose RM; Miranda de Sá AM; Velasques de Oliveira SM; Carneiro MP
Ann Nucl Med; 2013 Dec; 27(10):924-30. PubMed ID: 24114312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of a Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm for low-count clinical
Te Riet J; Rijnsdorp S; Roef MJ; Arends AJ
EJNMMI Phys; 2019 Dec; 6(1):32. PubMed ID: 31889228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Isotope independent determination of PET/CT modulation transfer functions from phantom measurements on spheres.
Prenosil GA; Klaeser B; Hentschel M; Fürstner M; Berndt M; Krause T; Weitzel T
Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5767. PubMed ID: 27782715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The influence of different signal-to-background ratios on spatial resolution and F18-FDG-PET quantification using point spread function and time-of-flight reconstruction.
Rogasch JM; Hofheinz F; Lougovski A; Furth C; Ruf J; Großer OS; Mohnike K; Hass P; Walke M; Amthauer H; Steffen IG
EJNMMI Phys; 2014 Dec; 1(1):12. PubMed ID: 26501454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Performance evaluation of microPET: a high-resolution lutetium oxyorthosilicate PET scanner for animal imaging.
Chatziioannou AF; Cherry SR; Shao Y; Silverman RW; Meadors K; Farquhar TH; Pedarsani M; Phelps ME
J Nucl Med; 1999 Jul; 40(7):1164-75. PubMed ID: 10405138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. PET based volume segmentation with emphasis on the iterative TrueX algorithm.
Knäusl B; Hirtl A; Dobrozemsky G; Bergmann H; Kletter K; Dudczak R; Georg D
Z Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 22(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 21251804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Reconstructed spatial resolution and contrast recovery with Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction (Q.Clear) for FDG-PET compared to time-of-flight (TOF) with point spread function (PSF).
Rogasch JM; Suleiman S; Hofheinz F; Bluemel S; Lukas M; Amthauer H; Furth C
EJNMMI Phys; 2020 Jan; 7(1):2. PubMed ID: 31925574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
