BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37244133)

  • 1. Confusion and anxiety in between abnormal cervical cancer screening results and colposcopy: "The land of the unknown".
    Kohler RE; Hemler J; Wagner RB; Sullivan B; Macenat M; Tagai EK; Miller SM; Wen KY; Ayers C; Einstein MH; Hudson SV
    Patient Educ Couns; 2023 Sep; 114():107810. PubMed ID: 37244133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Benefits and potential harms of human papillomavirus (HPV)-based cervical cancer screening: A real-world comparison of HPV testing versus cytology.
    Thomsen LT; Kjaer SK; Munk C; Ørnskov D; Waldstrøm M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Mar; 100(3):394-402. PubMed ID: 33566361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Real-world research on cervical cancer screening program and effect evaluation for Chinese population].
    Zhao YQ; Dai Y; Dang L; Kong LH; Zhang Y; Feng RM; Qiao YL; Lang JH
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Oct; 40(10):764-771. PubMed ID: 30392341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Understanding the role of oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) status on adherence behaviors among women with abnormal cervical cytology.
    Buick C; Murphy KJ; Howell D; Metcalfe K
    BMC Womens Health; 2021 Jan; 21(1):29. PubMed ID: 33461543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Human papillomavirus test with cytology triage in organized screening for cervical cancer.
    Veijalainen O; Kares S; Kujala P; Tirkkonen M; Vuento R; Kholová I; Luukkaala T; Osuala V; Mäenpää J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Nov; 95(11):1220-1227. PubMed ID: 27591407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
    C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
    Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Colposcopy non-attendance following an abnormal cervical cancer screening result: a prospective population-based cohort study.
    Liang LA; Zeissig SR; Schauberger G; Merzweiler S; Radde K; Fischbeck S; Ikenberg H; Blettner M; Klug SJ
    BMC Womens Health; 2022 Jul; 22(1):285. PubMed ID: 35810270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk of Cervical Dysplasia After Colposcopy Care and Risk-Informed Return to Population-Based Screening: A Systematic Review.
    Costa-Fagbemi M; Yakubu M; Meggetto O; Moffatt J; Walker MJ; Koné AP; Murphy KJ; Kupets R
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2020 May; 42(5):607-624. PubMed ID: 31679914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The IMproving Primary Screening And Colposcopy Triage trial: human papillomavirus, cervical cytology, and histopathologic results from the baseline and 1-year follow-up phase.
    Safaeian M; Wright TC; Stoler MH; Ranger-Moore J; Rehm S; Aslam S; Fang Q; Volkir P; Ridder R
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Sep; 225(3):278.e1-278.e16. PubMed ID: 33852886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Health technology assessment report: HPV DNA based primary screening for cervical cancer precursors].
    Ronco G; Biggeri A; Confortini M; Naldoni C; Segnan N; Sideri M; Zappa M; Zorzi M; Calvia M; Accetta G; Giordano L; Cogo C; Carozzi F; Gillio Tos A; Arbyn M; Mejier CJ; Snijders PJ; Cuzick J; Giorgi Rossi P
    Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(3-4 Suppl 1):e1-72. PubMed ID: 22828243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A prospective study of risk-based colposcopy demonstrates improved detection of cervical precancers.
    Wentzensen N; Walker J; Smith K; Gold MA; Zuna R; Massad LS; Liu A; Silver MI; Dunn ST; Schiffman M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):604.e1-604.e8. PubMed ID: 29462629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.
    Castle PE; Stoler MH; Wright TC; Sharma A; Wright TL; Behrens CM
    Lancet Oncol; 2011 Sep; 12(9):880-90. PubMed ID: 21865084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chatbot-interfaced and cognitive-affective barrier-driven messages to improve colposcopy adherence after abnormal Pap test results in underserved urban women: A feasibility pilot study.
    Wen KY; Dayaratna S; Slamon R; Granda-Cameron C; Tagai EK; Kohler RE; Hudson SV; Miller SM
    Transl Behav Med; 2024 Jan; 14(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 38014626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early detection of CIN3 and cervical cancer during long-term follow-up using HPV/Pap smear co-testing and risk-adapted follow-up in a locally organised screening programme.
    Luyten A; Buttmann-Schweiger N; Luyten K; Mauritz C; Reinecke-Lüthge A; Pietralla M; Meijer CJ; Petry KU
    Int J Cancer; 2014 Sep; 135(6):1408-16. PubMed ID: 24519782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 'I don't care whether it's HPV or ABC, I just want to know if I have cancer.' Factors influencing women's emotional responses to undergoing human papillomavirus testing in routine management in cervical screening: a qualitative study.
    O'Connor M; Costello L; Murphy J; Prendiville W; Martin CM; O'Leary JJ; Sharp L;
    BJOG; 2014 Oct; 121(11):1421-9. PubMed ID: 24690225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A pilot study of HPV DNA and cytology testing in 50,159 women in the routine Mexican Social Security Program.
    Lazcano-Ponce E; Lörincz AT; Salmerón J; Fernández I; Cruz A; Hernández P; Mejia I; Hernández-Avila M
    Cancer Causes Control; 2010 Oct; 21(10):1693-700. PubMed ID: 20617376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Understanding Perceived Barriers to Colposcopy Follow-Up Among Underserved Women at an Urban Teaching Hospital: A Qualitative Study.
    Kulkarni A; Glynn S; Gamble CR; Shen MJ; Cantillo E; Frey MK; Holcomb KM; Safford MM; Chapman-Davis E
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2023 Jan; 27(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 36074132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Age-specific evaluation of primary human papillomavirus screening vs conventional cytology in a randomized setting.
    Leinonen M; Nieminen P; Kotaniemi-Talonen L; Malila N; Tarkkanen J; Laurila P; Anttila A
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Dec; 101(23):1612-23. PubMed ID: 19903804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of the effectiveness of HPV16/18 infection referred for colposcopy in cervical cancer screening in Northwest of China.
    Zhang Q; Zhao M; Cao D; Wei X; Wang L; Li Y; Yang T; Zhao J; Pei M; Jia H; Cao S; Quan S; Yang X
    J Med Virol; 2018 Jan; 90(1):165-171. PubMed ID: 28710863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of a high-risk human papillomavirus DNA test as the primary test in a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based cohort study.
    Zorzi M; Del Mistro A; Farruggio A; de'Bartolomeis L; Frayle-Salamanca H; Baboci L; Bertazzo A; Cocco P; Fedato C; Gennaro M; Marchi N; Penon MG; Cogo C; Ferro A
    BJOG; 2013 Sep; 120(10):1260-7; discussion 1267-8. PubMed ID: 23786222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.