BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37244767)

  • 21. A Prospective Multicenter Comparison Study of Risk-adapted Ultrasound-directed and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-directed Diagnostic Pathways for Suspected Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-naïve Men.
    Wagensveld IM; Osses DF; Groenendijk PM; Zijta FM; Busstra MB; Rociu E; Barentsz JO; Michiel Sedelaar JP; Arbeel B; Roeleveld T; Geenen R; Koeter I; van der Meer SA; Cappendijk V; Somford R; Klaver S; Van der Lely H; Wolters T; Hellings W; Leter MR; Van der Poel HG; Heijmink SWTPJ; Debruyne F; Immerzeel J; Leijte J; van Roermund J; Miclea R; Planken E; Vis AN; Jan de Jong I; Tijsterman J; Wolterbeek D; Claessen A; Vrijhof E; Nederend J; Van Leenders GJLH; Bangma CH; Krestin GP; Remmers S; Schoots IG;
    Eur Urol; 2022 Sep; 82(3):318-326. PubMed ID: 35341658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer.
    Kuru TH; Roethke MC; Seidenader J; Simpfendörfer T; Boxler S; Alammar K; Rieker P; Popeneciu VI; Roth W; Pahernik S; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
    J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1380-6. PubMed ID: 23608676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Using Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Scores to Select an Optimal Prostate Biopsy Method: A Secondary Analysis of the Trio Study.
    Ahdoot M; Lebastchi AH; Long L; Wilbur AR; Gomella PT; Mehralivand S; Daneshvar MA; Yerram NK; O'Connor LP; Wang AZ; Gurram S; Bloom J; Siddiqui MM; Linehan WM; Merino M; Choyke PL; Pinsky P; Parnes H; Shih JH; Turkbey B; Wood BJ; Pinto PA;
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Apr; 5(2):176-186. PubMed ID: 33846112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Analysis of the relationship between PI-RADS scores and the pathological results of targeted biopsy based on MRI].
    Wang YM; Shang JW; Dong L; Liang LH; Zhao RZ; Liang C; Wang SQ; Xia W; Cheng G; Hua LX
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2023 Nov; 45(11):942-947. PubMed ID: 37968079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Individualised non-contrast MRI-based risk estimation and shared decision-making in men with a suspicion of prostate cancer: protocol for multicentre randomised controlled trial (multi-IMPROD V.2.0).
    Ettala O; Jambor I; Montoya Perez I; Seppänen M; Kaipia A; Seikkula H; Syvänen KT; Taimen P; Verho J; Steiner A; Saunavaara J; Saukko E; Löyttyniemi E; Sjoberg DD; Vickers A; Aronen H; Boström P
    BMJ Open; 2022 Apr; 12(4):e053118. PubMed ID: 35428621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The additive value of mpMRI on prostate cancer detection: Comparison between patients with and without a suspicious digital rectal examination (DRE).
    Omri N; Alex S; Jacob B; Ofer N
    Urol Oncol; 2021 Oct; 39(10):728.e7-728.e11. PubMed ID: 33454199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prebiopsy Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined with Prostate-specific Antigen Density in Detecting and Ruling out Gleason 7-10 Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-naïve Men.
    Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thestrup KC; Jakobsen H; Thomsen HS
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 May; 2(3):311-319. PubMed ID: 31200846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Predicting the Need for Biopsy to Detect Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Patients with a Magnetic Resonance Imaging-detected Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System/Likert ≥3 Lesion: Development and Multinational External Validation of the Imperial Rapid Access to Prostate Imaging and Diagnosis Risk Score.
    Peters M; Eldred-Evans D; Kurver P; Falagario UG; Connor MJ; Shah TT; Verhoeff JJC; Taimen P; Aronen HJ; Knaapila J; Montoya Perez I; Ettala O; Stabile A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Martini A; Cucchiara V; Briganti A; Lantz A; Picker W; Haug ES; Nordström T; Tanaka MB; Reddy D; Bass E; van Rossum PSN; Wong K; Tam H; Winkler M; Gordon S; Qazi H; Boström PJ; Jambor I; Ahmed HU
    Eur Urol; 2022 Nov; 82(5):559-568. PubMed ID: 35963650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Which men with non-malignant pathology at magnetic resonance imaging-targeted prostate biopsy and persistent PI-RADS 3-5 lesions should repeat biopsy?
    Castellani D; Pace G; Cecchini S; Franzese C; Cicconofri A; Romagnoli D; Del Rosso A; Possanzini M; Paci E; Dellabella M; Pierangeli T
    Urol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 40(10):452.e9-452.e16. PubMed ID: 35871992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Analysis of risk factors for determining the need for prostate biopsy in patients with negative MRI.
    Liang L; Qi F; Cheng Y; Zhang L; Cao D; Cheng G; Hua L
    Sci Rep; 2021 Mar; 11(1):6048. PubMed ID: 33723287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prostate biopsy in the era of MRI-targeting: towards a judicious use of additional systematic biopsy.
    Deniffel D; Perlis N; Ghai S; Girgis S; Healy GM; Fleshner N; Hamilton R; Kulkarni G; Toi A; van der Kwast T; Zlotta A; Finelli A; Haider MA
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7544-7554. PubMed ID: 35507051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Can Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies in men with PSA levels of 4-10 ng/ml?
    Xu N; Wu YP; Chen DN; Ke ZB; Cai H; Wei Y; Zheng QS; Huang JB; Li XD; Xue XY
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2018 May; 144(5):987-995. PubMed ID: 29504080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Analysis of histological findings obtained combining US/mp-MRI fusion-guided biopsies with systematic US biopsies: mp-MRI role in prostate cancer detection and false negative.
    Faiella E; Santucci D; Greco F; Frauenfelder G; Giacobbe V; Muto G; Zobel BB; Grasso RF
    Radiol Med; 2018 Feb; 123(2):143-152. PubMed ID: 29019021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Systematic prostate biopsy still matters: A comprehensive analysis of MRI/TRUS-fusion targeted prostate biopsies across different indications.
    Westhoff N; Baeßler B; von Hardenberg J; Hetjens S; Porubsky S; Siegel F; Martini T; Michel MS; Attenberger U; Ritter M
    Urol Oncol; 2019 Oct; 37(10):678-687. PubMed ID: 31375340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Predicting Benign Prostate Pathology on Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy in Men with a Prior Negative 12-core Systematic Biopsy: External Validation of a Prognostic Nomogram.
    Bjurlin MA; Renson A; Rais-Bahrami S; Truong M; Rosenkrantz AB; Huang R; Taneja SS
    Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Sep; 5(5):815-822. PubMed ID: 29802053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. MRI Fusion-Targeted Transrectal Prostate Biopsy and the Role of Prostate-Specific Antigen Density and Prostate Health Index for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Southeast Asian Men.
    Tan TW; Png KS; Lee CH; Yuwono A; Yeow Y; Chong KT; Lee YM; Tan CH; Tan YK
    J Endourol; 2017 Nov; 31(11):1111-1116. PubMed ID: 28797178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging outperforms the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator in predicting clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Salami SS; Vira MA; Turkbey B; Fakhoury M; Yaskiv O; Villani R; Ben-Levi E; Rastinehad AR
    Cancer; 2014 Sep; 120(18):2876-82. PubMed ID: 24917122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Natural History of Patients with Prostate MRI Likert 1-3 and Development of RosCaP: a Multivariate Risk Score for Clinically Significant Cancer.
    Orecchia L; Nardi A; Fletcher P; Ippoliti S; Grounds J; Dokubo I; Spicchiale CF; Miah S; Miano R; Barrett T; Kastner C
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2023 Feb; 21(1):162-170. PubMed ID: 35970760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Risk-based MRI-directed diagnostic pathway outperforms non-risk-based pathways in suspected prostate cancer biopsy-naïve men: a large cohort validation study.
    Bittencourt LK; Guricova K; Zucker I; Durieux JC; Schoots IG
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Apr; 32(4):2330-2339. PubMed ID: 35028750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Risk of prostate cancer for men with prior negative biopsies undergoing magnetic resonance imaging compared with biopsy-naive men: A prospective evaluation of the PLUM cohort.
    Patel HD; Koehne EL; Shea SM; Bhanji Y; Gerena M; Gorbonos A; Quek ML; Flanigan RC; Goldberg A; Gupta GN
    Cancer; 2022 Jan; 128(1):75-84. PubMed ID: 34427930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.