These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37244792)
21. Evaluation of volumetric wear of abutments on the retention loss of ball attachment systems in implant-retained overdentures: An in vitro study. Yabul A; Dayan C; Geckili O; Bilhan H; Tuncer N Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Oct; 20(5):778-784. PubMed ID: 30028561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Freedom of rotation of selected overdenture attachments: an in vitro study. Chen IC; Brudvik JS; Mancl LA; Rubenstein JE; Chitswe K; Raigrodski AJ J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Aug; 106(2):78-86. PubMed ID: 21821161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of the retention characteristics of various stud attachment systems for implant retained overdenture. Gonuldas F; Tokar E; Ozturk C Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2018; 20(4):135-141. PubMed ID: 30821291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Retentive Properties of Two Stud Attachments with Polyetherketoneketone or Nylon Insert in Mandibular Implant Overdentures. Choi JW; Yun BH; Jeong CM; Huh JB Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):1079-1088. PubMed ID: 30231095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Retentive Properties of O-Ring and Locator Attachments for Implant-Retained Maxillary Overdentures: An In Vitro Study. ELsyad MA; Elhaddad AA; Khirallah AS J Prosthodont; 2018 Jul; 27(6):568-576. PubMed ID: 27589487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Retention force and allowable range of the angle of an implant-supported overdenture attachment system using healing screws and a silicone resilient denture liner. Koike T; Kubo K; Kono T; Ueda T; Sakurai K J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Apr; 123(4):630-634. PubMed ID: 31383531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of changes in retentive force of three stud attachments for implant overdentures. Kim SM; Choi JW; Jeon YC; Jeong CM; Yun MJ; Lee SH; Huh JB J Adv Prosthodont; 2015 Aug; 7(4):303-11. PubMed ID: 26330977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of Various Retentive Element Materials on Retention of Mandibular Implant-Retained Overdentures. Chindarungruangrat A; Eiampongpaiboon T; Jirajariyavej B Molecules; 2022 Jun; 27(12):. PubMed ID: 35745048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Attachment systems for implant overdenture: influence of implant inclination on retentive and lateral forces. Yang TC; Maeda Y; Gonda T; Kotecha S Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1315-9. PubMed ID: 21426402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Retention force and deformation of an innovative attachment model for mini-implant-retained overdentures. Valente MLC; Shimano MVW; Agnelli JAM; Dos Reis AC J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):129-134. PubMed ID: 29961625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Influence of repeated insertion-removal cycles on the force and magnetic flux leakage of magnetic attachments: an in vitro study. Hao Z; Chao Y; Meng Y; Yin H J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):235-40. PubMed ID: 24439071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of thermocycling on the retentive force of the retentive inserts in three denture attachments and their water absorption ability. Kamonkhantikul K; Arksornnukit M; Homsiang W Dent Mater J; 2024 Jan; 43(1):90-96. PubMed ID: 38148022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Retentive characteristics of overdenture attachments during repeated dislodging and cyclic loading. Chung KH; Whiting D; Kronstrom M; Chan D; Wataha J Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(2):127-9. PubMed ID: 21479277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The service life of implant-retained overdenture attachment systems. Pigozzo MN; Mesquita MF; Henriques GE; Vaz LG J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Aug; 102(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 19643220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. In vitro retention force changes during cyclic dislodging of three novel attachment systems for implant overdentures with different implant angulations. Maniewicz S; Badoud I; Herrmann FR; Chebib N; Ammann P; Schimmel M; Müller F; Srinivasan M Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Apr; 31(4):315-327. PubMed ID: 31876004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of retention and wear of a titanium-formed stud overdenture attachment with different interimplant angulations after simulated clinical use: An in vitro study. Elsonbaty MA; Alshimy AM; Abdul-Monem MM; Neena AF J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):205.e1-205.e10. PubMed ID: 35842280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of Cyclic Dislodging on the Retention of Two Attachment Systems for Implant-supported Overdentures: An In Vitro Study. Tohme H; Makzoume J; Boulos P; Fakhoury J; Yared C; Salameh Z; Daou M J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1386-1392. PubMed ID: 30602646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: an in vitro retention force investigation on different designs. Alsabeeha N; Atieh M; Swain MV; Payne AG Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 20305857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Impact of implants number and attachment type on the peri-implant stresses and retention of palateless implant-retained overdenture. Hegazy SA; El Mekawy N; Emera RMK Indian J Dent Res; 2020; 31(3):414-419. PubMed ID: 32769276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]