These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37244838)

  • 1. Reducing costs of referrals for non-neonatal circumcision in Florida Medicaid population.
    Hernandez K; Soto S; Ellsworth PI
    J Pediatr Urol; 2023 Oct; 19(5):537.e1-537.e6. PubMed ID: 37244838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of Florida Medicaid guidelines on frequency and cost of delayed circumcision at Nemours Children's hospital.
    Soto S; Hernandez K; Colon-Sanchez K; Ellsworth P
    J Pediatr Urol; 2022 Dec; 18(6):834.e1-834.e7. PubMed ID: 35317991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Projected financial impact of noncoverage of elective circumcision by Louisiana medicaid in boys 0 to 5 years old.
    Ortenberg J; Roth CC
    J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4 Suppl):1540-4. PubMed ID: 23429072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Referrals from primary care with foreskin symptoms: Room for improvement.
    Sutton G; Fryer S; Rimmer G; Melling CV; Corbett HJ
    J Pediatr Surg; 2023 Feb; 58(2):266-269. PubMed ID: 36428185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. To circ or not to circ: indications, risks, and alternatives to circumcision in the pediatric population with phimosis.
    Steadman B; Ellsworth P
    Urol Nurs; 2006 Jun; 26(3):181-94. PubMed ID: 16800325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sutureless circumcision using monopolar diathermy and 2-octyl cyanoacrylate is safe and effective in a cohort of 634 post-neonatal prepubescent boys.
    Lovin JM; Stone KM; Pickett JK; Kirsch AJ
    J Pediatr Urol; 2022 Dec; 18(6):790-795. PubMed ID: 35466011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lack of Medicaid Coverage of Routine Newborn Circumcision Leads to Increased Operative Circumcisions, Chordee Procedures, and Balanitis.
    Lin CY; Johnson EK; Del Rio CV; Grimsby GM
    Urology; 2023 Sep; 179():136-142. PubMed ID: 37328011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Allocation of healthcare dollars: analysis of nonneonatal circumcisions in Florida.
    Gutwein LG; Alvarez JF; Gutwein JL; Kays DW; Islam S
    Am Surg; 2013 Sep; 79(9):865-9. PubMed ID: 24069977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness analysis of treatments for phimosis: a comparison of surgical and medicinal approaches and their economic effect.
    Berdeu D; Sauze L; Ha-Vinh P; Blum-Boisgard C
    BJU Int; 2001 Feb; 87(3):239-44. PubMed ID: 11167650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. To circ or not to circ: clinical and pharmacoeconomic outcomes of a prospective trial of topical steroid versus primary circumcision.
    Nobre YD; Freitas RG; Felizardo MJ; Ortiz V; Macedo A
    Int Braz J Urol; 2010; 36(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 20202239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Commentary on "Reducing costs of referrals for non-neonatal circumcision in Florida Medicaid population".
    Kara YA; Toker-Kurtmen B
    J Pediatr Urol; 2024 Feb; 20(1):152. PubMed ID: 37925280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retractable foreskin reduces urinary tract infections in infant boys with vesicoureteral reflux.
    Holzman SA; Chamberlin JD; Davis-Dao CA; Le DT; Delgado VA; Macaraeg AM; Dorgalli C; Chuang KW; Stephany HA; Wehbi EJ; Khoury AE
    J Pediatr Urol; 2021 Apr; 17(2):209.e1-209.e6. PubMed ID: 33516608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Topical steroid therapy as an alternative to circumcision for phimosis in boys younger than 3 years.
    Elmore JM; Baker LA; Snodgrass WT
    J Urol; 2002 Oct; 168(4 Pt 2):1746-7; discussion 1747. PubMed ID: 12352350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Response to letter to the editor re reducing costs of referrals for non-neonatal circumcision in Florida Medicaid population.
    Ellsworth P
    J Pediatr Urol; 2024 Feb; 20(1):153. PubMed ID: 37903672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Troubles with the foreskin: one hundred consecutive referrals to paediatric surgeons.
    Huntley JS; Bourne MC; Munro FD; Wilson-Storey D
    J R Soc Med; 2003 Sep; 96(9):449-51. PubMed ID: 12949201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Circumcision rates in the United States: rising or falling? What effect might the new affirmative pediatric policy statement have?
    Morris BJ; Bailis SA; Wiswell TE
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2014 May; 89(5):677-86. PubMed ID: 24702735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-effective treatment of phimosis.
    Van Howe RS
    Pediatrics; 1998 Oct; 102(4):E43. PubMed ID: 9755280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Review of clinical experience for a new preputioplasty technique as circumcision alternative].
    Binet A; François-Fiquet C; Bouche-Pillon MA
    Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 2016 Feb; 61(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 25708731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phimosis--a diagnostic dilemma?
    McGregor TB; Pike JG; Leonard MP
    Can J Urol; 2005 Apr; 12(2):2598-602. PubMed ID: 15877942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcome of topical steroid application in children with non-retractile prepuce.
    Makhija D; Shah H; Tiwari C; Dwiwedi P; Gandhi S
    Dev Period Med; 2018; 22(1):71-74. PubMed ID: 29641424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.