BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37245193)

  • 1. Comparison of organ dose from chest radiography with varying beam quality and constant exposure index.
    Nakanishi K
    Phys Eng Sci Med; 2023 Sep; 46(3):1143-1151. PubMed ID: 37245193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of varying X-ray tube voltage and additional filtration on image quality and patient dose in digital radiography system.
    E A; A Y; T O
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2023 Sep; 199():110893. PubMed ID: 37321050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The profound effects of patient arm positioning on organ doses from CT procedures calculated using Monte Carlo simulations and deformable phantoms.
    Liu H; Gao Y; Ding A; Caracappa PF; Xu XG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Apr; 164(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 25227436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Organ and effective doses in pediatric patients undergoing helical multislice computed tomography examination.
    Lee C; Lee C; Staton RJ; Hintenlang DE; Arreola MM; Williams JL; Bolch WE
    Med Phys; 2007 May; 34(5):1858-73. PubMed ID: 17555267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dose optimization in pediatric cardiac x-ray imaging.
    Gislason AJ; Davies AG; Cowen AR
    Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5258-69. PubMed ID: 21089760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ultra-high pitch chest computed tomography at 70 kVp tube voltage in an anthropomorphic pediatric phantom and non-sedated pediatric patients: Initial experience with 3
    Hagelstein C; Henzler T; Haubenreisser H; Meyer M; Sudarski S; Schoenberg SO; Neff KW; Weis M
    Z Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 26(4):349-361. PubMed ID: 26702762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimation of absorbed organ doses and effective dose based on body mass index in digital radiography.
    Kim H; Park M; Park S; Jeong H; Kim J; Kim Y
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jan; 153(1):92-9. PubMed ID: 22772453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Organ doses for reference adult male and female undergoing computed tomography estimated by Monte Carlo simulations.
    Lee C; Kim KP; Long D; Fisher R; Tien C; Simon SL; Bouville A; Bolch WE
    Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1196-206. PubMed ID: 21520832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experimental investigation of the dose and image quality characteristics of a digital mammography imaging system.
    Huda W; Sajewicz AM; Ogden KM; Dance DR
    Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):442-8. PubMed ID: 12674245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of radiographic techniques (kVp and mAs) on image quality and patient doses in digital subtraction angiography.
    Gkanatsios NA; Huda W; Peters KR
    Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1643-50. PubMed ID: 12201409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of beam tube potential variation on gonad dose to patients during chest radiography investigated using high sensitivity LiF:Mg,Cu,P thermoluminescent dosemeters.
    Fung KK; Gilboy WB
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Apr; 74(880):358-67. PubMed ID: 11387155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Organ doses for reference pediatric and adolescent patients undergoing computed tomography estimated by Monte Carlo simulation.
    Lee C; Kim KP; Long DJ; Bolch WE
    Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):2129-46. PubMed ID: 22482634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of Localizer Radiography Projection on Organ Dose at Chest CT with Automatic Tube Current Modulation.
    Saltybaeva N; Krauss A; Alkadhi H
    Radiology; 2017 Mar; 282(3):842-849. PubMed ID: 27548276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Organ doses evaluation for chest computed tomography procedures with TL dosimeters: Comparison with Monte Carlo simulations.
    Giansante L; Martins JC; Nersissian DY; Kiers KC; Kay FU; Sawamura MVY; Lee C; Gebrim EMMS; Costa PR
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 20(1):308-320. PubMed ID: 30508315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiation dose and image quality in pediatric CT: effect of technical factors and phantom size and shape.
    Siegel MJ; Schmidt B; Bradley D; Suess C; Hildebolt C
    Radiology; 2004 Nov; 233(2):515-22. PubMed ID: 15358847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigation of optimum X-ray beam tube voltage and filtration for chest radiography with a computed radiography system.
    Moore CS; Beavis AW; Saunderson JR
    Br J Radiol; 2008 Oct; 81(970):771-7. PubMed ID: 18662964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of tube voltage and iodine contrast medium on radiation dose of whole-body CT.
    Yoshida M; Nakaura T; Oda S; Kidoh M; Nagayama Y; Uetani H; Azuma M; Sakabe D; Hirai T; Funama Y
    Acta Radiol; 2022 Apr; 63(4):458-466. PubMed ID: 33709794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dose Optimization for Computed Tomography Localizer Radiographs for Low-Dose Lung Computed Tomography Examinations.
    Schmidt BT; Hupfer M; Saltybaeva N; Kolditz D; Kalender WA
    Invest Radiol; 2017 Feb; 52(2):81-86. PubMed ID: 27518213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploring the reliability of the exposure index with a range of kV and mAs values: An experimental study.
    van Schoonhoven MT; Hayre DCM; England DA
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2021 Dec; 52(4):559-566. PubMed ID: 34602372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose.
    Rill LN; Brateman L; Arreola M
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.