These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37245193)

  • 21. ESTIMATION OF FEMALE RADIATION DOSES AND BREAST CANCER RISK FROM CHEST CT EXAMINATIONS.
    Lahham A; ALMasri H; Kameel S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Jun; 179(4):303-309. PubMed ID: 29237054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Relationship Between Tube Voltage and Physical Image Quality of Pulmonary Nodules on Chest Radiographs Obtained Using the Bone-Suppression Technique.
    Takagi S; Yaegashi T; Ishikawa M
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Jul; 26(7):e174-e179. PubMed ID: 30269955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Use of Model-based Iterative Reconstruction to Optimize Chest CT Examinations for Diagnosing Lung Metastases in Patients with Sarcoma: A Phantom Study.
    Kaasalainen T; Mäkelä T; Kelaranta A; Kortesniemi M
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Jan; 26(1):50-61. PubMed ID: 29724675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of automatic tube voltage selection on image quality and radiation dose in abdominal CT angiography of various body sizes: a phantom study.
    Schindera ST; Winklehner A; Alkadhi H; Goetti R; Fischer M; Gnannt R; Szucs-Farkas Z
    Clin Radiol; 2013 Feb; 68(2):e79-86. PubMed ID: 23219454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Increased radiation dose to overweight and obese patients from radiographic examinations.
    Yanch JC; Behrman RH; Hendricks MJ; McCall JH
    Radiology; 2009 Jul; 252(1):128-39. PubMed ID: 19403846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Patient doses and projection angle in cone beam CT.
    He W; Huda W; Magill D; Tavrides E; Yao H
    Med Phys; 2010 May; 37(5):2359-68. PubMed ID: 20527570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Vertical off-centering affects organ dose in chest CT: Evidence from Monte Carlo simulations in anthropomorphic phantoms.
    Saltybaeva N; Alkadhi H
    Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 44(11):5697-5704. PubMed ID: 28817195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Organ and effective doses in newborn patients during helical multislice computed tomography examination.
    Staton RJ; Lee C; Lee C; Williams MD; Hintenlang DE; Arreola MM; Williams JL; Bolch WE
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):5151-66. PubMed ID: 17019030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Circle of Willis at CT angiography: dose reduction and image quality--reducing tube voltage and increasing tube current settings.
    Waaijer A; Prokop M; Velthuis BK; Bakker CJ; de Kort GA; van Leeuwen MS
    Radiology; 2007 Mar; 242(3):832-9. PubMed ID: 17229873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of an X-Ray Dose Profile Derived from an Optically Stimulated Luminescent Dosimeter during Computed Tomographic Fluoroscopy.
    Hasegawa H; Sato M; Tanaka H
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132154. PubMed ID: 26151914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Investigation of the dose distribution for a cone beam CT system dedicated to breast imaging.
    Lanconelli N; Mettivier G; Lo Meo S; Russo P
    Phys Med; 2013 Jun; 29(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 22763280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 3: Conversion coefficients for reconstruction of organ doses achieved during chest X-ray examinations].
    Seidenbusch MC; Regulla D; Schneider K
    Rofo; 2008 Dec; 180(12):1061-81. PubMed ID: 19235700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Varying kVp as a means of reducing CT breast dose to pediatric patients.
    Mathieu KB; Turner AC; Khatonabadi M; McNitt-Gray MF; Cagnon CH; Cody DD
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jul; 58(13):4455-69. PubMed ID: 23756499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ORGAN DOSES ASSESSMENT FOR PATIENTS UNDERGOING CONVENTIONAL X-RAY EXAMINATIONS: PHANTOM EXPERIMENTS VS. CALCULATIONS.
    Golikov V; Barkovsky A; Wallstrom E; Cederblad Å
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Jan; 178(2):223-234. PubMed ID: 28981902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Adult abdomen-pelvis CT: Does equilibrium dose-pitch product better account for the kVp dependence of organ dose than conventional CTDI?
    Li X; Morgan AG; Liptak CL; Muryn JS; Dong FF; Primak AN; Segars WP
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6258-68. PubMed ID: 26520718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dose reduction and image quality improvement of chest radiography by using bone-suppression technique and low tube voltage: a phantom study.
    Takagi S; Yaegashi T; Ishikawa M
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):571-580. PubMed ID: 31385049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Patient size and radiation exposure in thoracic, pelvic, and abdominal CT examinations performed with automatic exposure control.
    Israel GM; Cicchiello L; Brink J; Huda W
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Dec; 195(6):1342-6. PubMed ID: 21098193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Factors influencing the absorbed dose in intraoral radiography.
    Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Herz K; Reinert S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):506-13. PubMed ID: 18033949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of patient specific dose metrics between chest radiography, tomosynthesis, and CT for adult patients of wide ranging body habitus.
    Zhang Y; Li X; Segars WP; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):023901. PubMed ID: 24506654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A Monte Carlo-based method to estimate radiation dose from spiral CT: from phantom testing to patient-specific models.
    Jarry G; DeMarco JJ; Beifuss U; Cagnon CH; McNitt-Gray MF
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Aug; 48(16):2645-63. PubMed ID: 12974580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.