BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37245785)

  • 1. Distance between institutions of incarceration and procedural abortion facilities in Canada.
    Paynter M; Heggie C
    Contraception; 2023 Aug; 124():110079. PubMed ID: 37245785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does distance decrease healthcare options for pregnant, incarcerated people? Mapping the distance between abortion providers and prisons.
    Gips J; Psoter KJ; Sufrin C
    Contraception; 2020 Apr; 101(4):266-272. PubMed ID: 31982415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Intersection of Abortion and Criminalization: Abortion Access for People in Prisons.
    Paynter MJ; Norman WV
    Semin Reprod Med; 2022 Nov; 40(5-06):264-267. PubMed ID: 36535662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. "Breastfeeding in public" for incarcerated women: the baby-friendly steps.
    Paynter MJ; Snelgrove-Clarke E
    Int Breastfeed J; 2019; 14():16. PubMed ID: 31019543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Abortion Access for Incarcerated People: Incidence of Abortion and Policies at U.S. Prisons and Jails.
    Sufrin C; Jones RK; Beal L; Mosher WD; Bell S
    Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Sep; 138(3):330-337. PubMed ID: 34352850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Abortion and contraception for incarcerated people: A scoping review.
    Paynter M; Pinzón Hernández P; Heggie C; McKibbon S; Munro S
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(3):e0281481. PubMed ID: 36996087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identifying National Availability of Abortion Care and Distance From Major US Cities: Systematic Online Search.
    Cartwright AF; Karunaratne M; Barr-Walker J; Johns NE; Upadhyay UD
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 May; 20(5):e186. PubMed ID: 29759954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of new abortion restrictions on people in prison: Estimated number of incarcerated people without abortion access and distance to abortion providers.
    Bell SO; Dozier JL; Casubhoy I; Sufrin C
    Contraception; 2024 Jan; 129():110278. PubMed ID: 37673362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Abortion service provision in South Asia: A comparative study of four countries.
    Singh S; Sundaram A; Hossain A; Puri MC; Sathar Z; Shekhar C; Crowell M; Moore AM
    Contraception; 2020 Sep; 102(3):210-219. PubMed ID: 32479764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Incarceration Status Among Individuals Obtaining Abortion in the United States, 2020.
    Kirstein M; Fuentes L; Sufrin C
    Am J Public Health; 2023 Dec; 113(12):1352-1355. PubMed ID: 37939327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Abortion health services in Canada: Results of a 2012 national survey.
    Norman WV; Guilbert ER; Okpaleke C; Hayden AS; Steven Lichtenberg E; Paul M; White KO; Jones HE
    Can Fam Physician; 2016 Apr; 62(4):e209-e217. PubMed ID: 28192276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. "I mean, I didn't really have a choice of anything:" How incarceration influences abortion decision-making and precludes access in the United States.
    Sufrin CB; Devon-Williamston A; Beal L; Hayes CM; Kramer C
    Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2023 Sep; 55(3):165-177. PubMed ID: 37394626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Association Between Distance to an Abortion Facility and Abortion or Pregnancy Outcome Among a Prospective Cohort of People Seeking Abortion Online.
    Pleasants EA; Cartwright AF; Upadhyay UD
    JAMA Netw Open; 2022 May; 5(5):e2212065. PubMed ID: 35560050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mental health, chronic and infectious conditions among pregnant persons in US state prisons and local jails 2016-2017.
    Hendricks CA; Rajagopal KM; Sufrin CB; Kramer C; Jiménez MC
    Womens Health (Lond); 2024; 20():17455057241228748. PubMed ID: 38468474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. "I'll just deal with this on my own": a qualitative exploration of experiences with self-managed abortion in the United States.
    Raifman S; Ralph L; Biggs MA; Grossman D
    Reprod Health; 2021 May; 18(1):91. PubMed ID: 33947413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Barriers to medication abortion among Massachusetts public university students.
    Baker CN; Mathis J
    Contraception; 2022 May; 109():32-36. PubMed ID: 34971602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incarcerated women and abortion provision: a survey of correctional health providers.
    Sufrin CB; Creinin MD; Chang JC
    Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2009 Mar; 41(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 19291123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The perspective of Canadian health care professionals on abortion service during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    Ennis M; Wahl K; Jeong D; Knight K; Renner R; Munro S; Dunn S; Guilbert E; Norman WV
    Fam Pract; 2021 Aug; 38(Suppl 1):i30-i36. PubMed ID: 34448482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Female permanent contraception policies and occurrence at a sample of U.S. prisons and jails.
    Pan YL; Beal L; Espino K; Sufrin CB
    Contraception; 2021 Dec; 104(6):618-622. PubMed ID: 34400155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Federal, state, and institutional barriers to the expansion of medication and telemedicine abortion services in Ohio, Kentucky, and West Virginia during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    Mello K; Smith MH; Hill BJ; Chakraborty P; Rivlin K; Bessett D; Norris AH; McGowan ML
    Contraception; 2021 Jul; 104(1):111-116. PubMed ID: 33930382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.