These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37246310)

  • 1. Influence of metal artefact reduction on the diagnosis of contact between implant and mandibular canal in cone beam computed tomography: An ex-vivo study.
    de Freitas BN; da Motta RJG; Pauwels R; Oliveira-Santos C; Tirapelli C
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Jul; 34(7):741-750. PubMed ID: 37246310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do the tube current and metal artifact reduction influence the diagnosis of vertical root fracture in a tooth positioned in the vicinity of a zirconium implant? A CBCT study.
    Fontenele RC; Farias Gomes A; Nejaim Y; Freitas DQ
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Apr; 25(4):2229-2235. PubMed ID: 32827079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Artefacts at different distances from titanium and zirconia implants in cone-beam computed tomography: effect of tube current and metal artefact reduction.
    Mancini AXM; Santos MUC; Gaêta-Araujo H; Tirapelli C; Pauwels R; Oliveira-Santos C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Aug; 25(8):5087-5094. PubMed ID: 33544197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficacy of low-dose cone beam computed tomography and metal artifact reduction tool for assessment of peri-implant bone defects: an in vitro study.
    Nomier AS; Gaweesh YSE; Taalab MR; El Sadat SA
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Dec; 22(1):615. PubMed ID: 36528573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of the metal artefact reduction tool in the identification of fractured endodontic instruments in cone-beam computed tomography.
    Costa ED; Brasil DM; Queiroz PM; Verner FS; Junqueira RB; Freitas DQ
    Int Endod J; 2020 Apr; 53(4):506-512. PubMed ID: 31655019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do the number of basis images and metal artifact reduction affect the production of artifacts near and far from zirconium dental implants in CBCT?
    Nascimento EHL; Gaêta-Araujo H; Fontenele RC; Oliveira-Santos N; Oliveira-Santos C; Freitas DQ
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Sep; 25(9):5281-5291. PubMed ID: 33625608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of buccal marginal alveolar peri-implant and periodontal defects using a cone beam CT system with and without the application of metal artefact reduction mode.
    Kamburoglu K; Kolsuz E; Murat S; Eren H; Yüksel S; Paksoy CS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(8):20130176. PubMed ID: 23956236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The efficacy of metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithm in cone-beam computed tomography on the diagnostic accuracy of fenestration and dehiscence around dental implants.
    Sheikhi M; Behfarnia P; Mostajabi M; Nasri N
    J Periodontol; 2020 Feb; 91(2):209-214. PubMed ID: 31364765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnosis of vertical root fracture in teeth close and distant to implant: an in vitro study to assess the influence of artifacts produced in cone beam computed tomography.
    Freitas DQ; Vasconcelos TV; Noujeim M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Mar; 23(3):1263-1270. PubMed ID: 29984377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. CBCT image artefacts generated by implants located inside the field of view or in the exomass.
    Demirturk Kocasarac H; Koenig LJ; Ustaoglu G; Oliveira ML; Freitas DQ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2022 Feb; 51(2):20210092. PubMed ID: 34289314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Difference in the artefacts production and the performance of the metal artefact reduction (MAR) tool between the buccal and lingual cortical plates adjacent to zirconium dental implant.
    Nascimento EHL; Fontenele RC; Santaella GM; Freitas DQ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Dec; 48(8):20190058. PubMed ID: 31276425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of metal artefact reduction in cone-beam computed tomography images of different dental materials.
    Queiroz PM; Oliveira ML; Groppo FC; Haiter-Neto F; Freitas DQ
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Jan; 22(1):419-423. PubMed ID: 28536782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of exposure parameters of cone beam computed tomography on metal artifact reduction around the dental implants in various bone densities.
    Shokri A; Jamalpour MR; Khavid A; Mohseni Z; Sadeghi M
    BMC Med Imaging; 2019 Apr; 19(1):34. PubMed ID: 31035955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of calibration of a medical review monitor on the visibility of mandibular canal at dental implant sites: A cone beam CT study.
    Alkhader M; Hudieb M; Kheirallah K
    Indian J Dent Res; 2020; 31(6):883-887. PubMed ID: 33753658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk assessment of mandibular incisive canal perforation during dental implant surgery in the anterior edentulous mandible: a virtual implant placement study using cone beam computed tomography.
    Taşdemir I; Kalabalık F; Aytuğar E; Sağlam M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2023 Dec; 136(6):681-685. PubMed ID: 37612164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prototype metal artefact reduction algorithm in flat panel computed tomography - evaluation in patients undergoing transarterial hepatic radioembolisation.
    Hamie QM; Kobe AR; Mietzsch L; Manhart M; Puippe GD; Pfammatter T; Guggenberger R
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Jan; 28(1):265-273. PubMed ID: 28710583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accurate mandibular canal segmentation of dental CBCT using a two-stage 3D-UNet based segmentation framework.
    Lin X; Xin W; Huang J; Jing Y; Liu P; Han J; Ji J
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Aug; 23(1):551. PubMed ID: 37563606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of artefacts generated by titanium and zirconium implants in the study of trabecular bone architecture in cone-beam CT images.
    Vitulli I; Fontenele RC; Nascimento EHL; Freitas DQ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2022 Sep; 51(6):20220066. PubMed ID: 35466693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of artifacts generated by zirconium implants in cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Vasconcelos TV; Bechara BB; McMahan CA; Freitas DQ; Noujeim M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Feb; 123(2):265-272. PubMed ID: 28086998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Zirconia implants interfere with the evaluation of peri-implant bone defects in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images even with artifact reduction, a pilot study.
    Kuusisto N; Abushahba F; Syrjänen S; Huumonen S; Vallittu P; Närhi T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Nov; 52(8):20230252. PubMed ID: 37641961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.